[quote="UncleBeer" From reports, Craig "peered" from a distance of 3 feet from the door. Not exactly 'invasion of privacy'. And for the user of the stall not to give out a hearty "Take a hike, Nancy!" under these circumstances points to entrapment.
But ya'll seem to be more familiar with the 'secret handshake' than I. [/quote]
Three feet from the door, that's not even the distance between the sink and a bathroom stall. If he had put his eye in the crack, pardon the pun, that would have seemed very offensive and a dead giveaway to anybody present in the washroom. And yes, if someone watches me in a stall for two minutes (again, try and count two minutes and pretend you're staring at a a guy in the confines of a stall, that's a LONG time to be watching someone in a public bathroom), and that would be invasive of my privacy, absolutely. And remember, this is about anonymity, so he doesn't want others to know he's cruising, so it's not like he can yell out "Hey dude, I want to suck your dick in the john". And yes, of course, you're right, anybody not interested would tell him to take a hike, or worse, and that's just my point: Craig is one of the people that helped pass these laws to put police in places like this in order to maintain his family values. So, it's actually the police's job not to discourage the people who are trying to cruise in public bathrooms, in order to catch them. They are acting as bait. Once again, I completely disagree with these methods, and yes, to me too, this points to entrapment, but when it's people like ultra conservative, homophobic Larry Craig who gets busted, well, maybe this is one instance where I'm happy he took the bait.
And there's no "secret handshake": when someone flirts with you for two minutes, and motions for you in a bathroom stall with his fingers and feet, it's pretty clear what he wants, and it's not a piece of toilet paper.