greenblue wrote:
or maybe the people who don't make the distinction, don't know what they are saying?
Well, I mean in terms of socialism working and communism not because there is no evidence of either working. I know that there are distinct differences in the terms.
Quote:
That's because USSR communism was a new branch of Socialism, to an extreme, not the equivalent. Many socialists condemn Lenin's communism.
I know that. Most of the left has left that socialism, however, there is not socialism to replace that.
Quote:
This data makes a number of assumptions about 'freedom' and the role of the government that are not accepted by much of the world's population.
It is by the heritage institute. It does not matter how on earth you define freedom for this discussion so much as how they define it. Their definition would be relatively capitalistic.
Quote:
Why Japan is kinda low there? as their economy is very capitalist.
Because their economy really isn't. Japan is known for its tariffs, its subsidies, and its corporate bailouts. In fact, the Japanese model is often pointed to by economists who dislike markets as a refutation of neo-liberalism's claims, so yeah, it isn't.