Page 2 of 2 [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

The_Q
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 193
Location: The Continuum

16 Feb 2008, 8:21 am

I'm an atheist and am not superstitious. I believe that there is a rational explanation for everything, even if that explanation is yet to be discovered.


_________________
Q: "Humans are such commonplace little creatures."
--"Deja Q"


coolstertothecore
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 287
Location: England

16 Feb 2008, 10:25 am

I'm an atheist and no longer superstitious. I went through a period during my teens when I was occasionally superstitious, like wearing certain pieces of clothing for exams. But now I'm pretty much 100% logical. :-) If there's enough evidence for something then I believe it, if not, then I don't.

I remember doing about that Skinner experiment at uni where he gave pigeons food. Most of them repeated whatever it was they were doing just before the food came. If pigeons are superstitious, then I don't want to be. :D



SilverProteus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,915
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow

16 Feb 2008, 11:57 am

coolstertothecore wrote:
I remember doing about that Skinner experiment at uni where he gave pigeons food. Most of them repeated whatever it was they were doing just before the food came. If pigeons are superstitious, then I don't want to be. :D


LOL! I don't know why, but the thought of superstitious pigeons tickled a funny bone :P .

PLA wrote:
I know nothing. I work stuff out as I go. It's a lot like a puzzle. I don't like it when pieces don't fit. I put those pieces away, and every once in a while, I see if I can use them for something. If not: I put them away again.


That's an interesting way of putting it...

zee wrote:
I'm athiest and superstitious, which I guess makes me a hypocrite of sorts. But I wasn't an athiest all of my life, so maybe it's just the remainders of childhood, and furthermore I'm not a slave to superstitions. I'm not afraid of bad luck, I just like to increase good luck, IE if I have no choice but to walk under a ladder or eat 13 dumplings, then whatever.


That's more or less how I feel, you described it better than I did. Like, you don't believe in something rationally, but you still have that lingering thought at the back of your head. You're not a slave to your superstitions, because they don't dictate your actions, but they're there.



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

16 Feb 2008, 1:43 pm

Phagocyte wrote:
No, I do not. I am an agnostic as well, though I do not outright deny something that isn't scientifically proven. Granted, I won't accept it either, but I will analyze it and see if it's logically viable. That's really what agnosticism is about; it's about accepting that there is no proof, and thus, no reason to deny as well as accept (god, in this case). I really try not to "believe" in anything, really; I either see it as a valid notion, and invalid notion, or I am unsure.

I believe that is the best way to see things, all things, I see that doubt is better and makes a lot more sense than always denying and refuting things, and I think that being agnostic about everything is the most logical approach, which I try to be sometimes, although I think I could fail to not to believe in anything sometimes, but I am never 100% certain about anything.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Angelus-Mortis
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 8 Oct 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 438
Location: Canada, Toronto

16 Feb 2008, 2:30 pm

I don't believe in the supernatural. The supernatural, by definition defies all that is rational, and because the universe operates on rationally understood properties, the supernatural could not exist that way. If you were to consider something as being supernatural, but found evidence that it existed, then it would no longer be considered supernatural; there would be a rational explanation for it.

Most of the ideas of supernatural stem from ideas that are based on little more than imagination anyways, and have no real basis in reality.


_________________
231st Anniversary Dedication to Carl Friedrich Gauss:
http://angelustenebrae.livejournal.com/15848.html

Arbitraris id veneficium quod te ludificat. Arbitror id formam quod intellego.

Ignorationi est non medicina.


greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

16 Feb 2008, 6:31 pm

Angelus-Mortis wrote:
If you were to consider something as being supernatural, but found evidence that it existed, then it would no longer be considered supernatural

Yeah, pretty much it would be like that, and that is one of the reasons something is called supernatural or paranormal, because it doesn't have any scientific explanation yet, it has happened before.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Odin
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2006
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,475
Location: Moorhead, Minnesota, USA

16 Feb 2008, 7:18 pm

I am an atheist and I'm not consciously superstitious, though I do catch myself unconsciously following various common little culturally-ingrained superstitions like the 5-Second Rule.


_________________
My Blog: My Autistic Life


SilverProteus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,915
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow

16 Feb 2008, 7:41 pm

Odin wrote:
I am an atheist and I'm not consciously superstitious, though I do catch myself unconsciously following various common little culturally-ingrained superstitions like the 5-Second Rule.


Could it have more to do with OCD rather than superstition (even if cultural) per se?



Jaded
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Age: 44
Gender: Female
Posts: 553

17 Feb 2008, 1:40 pm

SilverProteus wrote:
Do you simply deny something if it isn't scientifically proven or if there isn't a scientific answer? Or do you believe in it but don't tell anybody?


I cannot think of any superstitions that I am prone to. I tend to believe there is a scientific explanation for everything.

I am, however, afraid of the idea of "ghosts", though believe there must be some kind of scientific explanation for anything of that nature as well.

So you see....



OnceHardcoreWasI
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 7

17 Feb 2008, 6:24 pm

I'm an atheist and not superstitious at all. I do believe in random chance and my reptilian brain's desire to find patterns where none really exist, though.



SilverProteus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,915
Location: Somewhere Over The Rainbow

17 Feb 2008, 8:55 pm

OnceHardcoreWasI wrote:
I'm an atheist and not superstitious at all. I do believe in random chance and my reptilian brain's desire to find patterns where none really exist, though.


Reptilian...irrational?

I look for patterns in everything, but I would'nt say I'm irrational. Most of the time.

(On a side note, interesting username.)