Evolution is fact. True, maybe we aren't sure exactly how, when, where, and why every living organism came to be, but we are not mistaken about the process by which life adapts.
Creationists and/or Intelligent Design Theorists are misguided. They make a habbit of reducing evolution to a straw man while hypocritically failing to apply their own skepticism to their beliefs. Changing the name to "Intelligent Design" is merely tactic to disguise the fact that many believe in a literal interpretation of Genesis. Occasionally creationists will make good points, but they have not and will not debunk evolution. Most fail to realize that even if they did succeed in doing this, they still wouldn't be providing a better alternative.
Should the universe have had a creator? I don't know, and I think the issue is far from resolved. Either way, a creator is an untestable hypothesis, so it is unscientific. ID theorists suggest that "creation speaks for itself" and that we know the mind of God simply by our appreciation, love, and awe of the universe. I suppose the more cynical atheists call this the "argument from creative interpretation".
I admit I am intrigued by the fact that evolution seems to be a system in and of itself, perhaps indicative of order, even if it is meant to function in chaos. Another creationist came up with a theory that all information--even and especially that of DNA, requires a sender. As intriguing as this sounds, I am still wary considering the source. In the end, I simply do not know if god is an unnecessary explaination that's been tacked onto everything else. It's really quite frustrating.
The book "Finding Darwin's God", which I have not read in it's entirety, is all about finding a middle ground between evolution and faith. I'd recomend it to anyone concerned with the issue.
_________________
"And lo, the beast looked upon the face of beauty. And beauty stayed his hand. And from that day on, he was as one dead."