claire333 wrote:
ToadOfSteel wrote:
Well I don't necessarily think that you are automatically good by default. Everyone is born good by default, but if you don't lead a good and honest life, it can become corrupted. Leading a "good and honest" life doesn't necessarily mean being tied to a particular religion. For example, I would think that Gandhi led such a life.
I do my best to lead a good and honest life. I appreciate the fact you did not point out, my good and honest life will not get me into your heaven due to my lack of faith in your savior. You currently have stereotype protection from me.
To answer that common misconception, I'm going to pull out my Bible (Matt. 25:34-40):
the Gospel of Matthew wrote:
Then the King will say to those at his right hand, 'Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me.'
Then the righteous will answer him, 'Lord, when was it that we saw you hungry and gave you food, or thirsty and gave you something to drink? And when was it that we saw you a stranger and welcomed you, or naked and gave you clothing? And when was it that we saw you sick or in prison and visited you?'
And the king will answer them, 'Truly I tell you, just as you did it to one of the least of these who are members of my family, you did it to me.'
The point I hear from that passage basically says nothing about
explicitly saying that you have to believe in Him in order to be admitted into the Kingdom. And indeed, the righteous don't even realize that by helping fellow humans that are in need like that, they are actually performing acts in the name of Jesus, and therefore
implicitly believe in Him (or at the very least His teachings).
I'm sure the fundies are going to muster everything they have against what I just said, since zealots always need to have an "Us and Them" mentality, since what I just said basically is only one interpretation of many, but I can hardly believe that otherwise righteous people like Gandhi would be damned to hell merely on a technicality. God loves humanity too much to just cast off people like that... otherwise, he would have let all of humanity die back during the Great Flood...
Yeah isn't there a name for this sort of thing. Western Humanism? I used to be like that, thought it was enough, but now I don't, I think you have to be full of faith.
I attended a Presbyterian church for a few years as a child, that was my only ongoing church experience and I didn't become a christian until I was about 40. I lean toward predestination so evangelism isn't my thing.
But on the general subject of the PPR forum, since the majority of members here are under 30 and have grown up in a largely secular world, I don't know that you would expect a high level of comment.
When I used to bother participating, I compared the rabid atheists to closet christians, in the sense that the most vehemently opposed are demonstrating a strong interest in matters of faith, so as banal and offensive as their level of comment may be, they're interested. I think I used to compare it to homophobia as well, in that the most vehement and loudest of opponents in that arena are very often found to be in denial of their true nature.