Canada is a nation of fags and fag-enablers!
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
You've said you're a tory before. Also, for clarification, I see no difference between most Evangelicals and the WBC.
Where have I said I was a "torie"? I identify as libertarian, which is fiscally conservative, but I'm definitely not a social conservative. I'm also downright anti-religion in my personal views, though I try to tone that down in my interactions with others, since I'm fully aware that it is a bigotry and that I shouldn't judge people based on their choice of faith. I certainly wouldn't go so far as to lump all the Evangelicals in with WBC, that is like calling all Muslims terrorists, both untrue and downright ignorant. I would say that your attitude is a perfect example of what I was talking about as far as Mr. Phelps goes, he's managed to prejudice you against the entire evangelical community.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
Dox47 wrote:
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
You've said you're a tory before. Also, for clarification, I see no difference between most Evangelicals and the WBC.
Where have I said I was a "torie"? I identify as libertarian, which is fiscally conservative, but I'm definitely not a social conservative. I'm also downright anti-religion in my personal views, though I try to tone that down in my interactions with others, since I'm fully aware that it is a bigotry and that I shouldn't judge people based on their choice of faith. I certainly wouldn't go so far as to lump all the Evangelicals in with WBC, that is like calling all Muslims terrorists, both untrue and downright ignorant. I would say that your attitude is a perfect example of what I was talking about as far as Mr. Phelps goes, he's managed to prejudice you against the entire evangelical community.
The reason I say this is because you attacked Obama, unless I'm thinking of somebody else. Usually in the US, if you attack Obama, you a person on the fascist right, or are on the extreme left. Also, my experiences in COS, capital of the evangelical movement, show that (most, I meant 3-4 good ones... out of hundreds) Evangelicals are every bit as vicious and Phelps and his ilk. They are hateful little cusses. It also ticked me off how so many of them hated Canada.
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
The reason I say this is because you attacked Obama, unless I'm thinking of somebody else. Usually in the US, if you attack Obama, you a person on the fascist right, or are on the extreme left. Also, my experiences in COS, capital of the evangelical movement, show that (most, I meant 3-4 good ones... out of hundreds) Evangelicals are every bit as vicious and Phelps and his ilk. They are hateful little cusses. It also ticked me off how so many of them hated Canada.
So anyone who is critical of Obama must either be a fascist or a barking moonbat? Right... And yet his supporters wonder why his detractors called him "the anointed one" and were concerned about the zealotry of his base... I am very critical of Obama. I also voted for him, that's what we fascists/moonbats like to call a "paradox". I think you may need to open your eyes to the world of gray out there, I'm starting to get the idea that you have a very black and white view of things and that is coloring your responses.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
Dox47 wrote:
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
The reason I say this is because you attacked Obama, unless I'm thinking of somebody else. Usually in the US, if you attack Obama, you a person on the fascist right, or are on the extreme left. Also, my experiences in COS, capital of the evangelical movement, show that (most, I meant 3-4 good ones... out of hundreds) Evangelicals are every bit as vicious and Phelps and his ilk. They are hateful little cusses. It also ticked me off how so many of them hated Canada.
So anyone who is critical of Obama must either be a fascist or a barking moonbat? Right... And yet his supporters wonder why his detractors called him "the anointed one" and were concerned about the zealotry of his base... I am very critical of Obama. I also voted for him, that's what we fascists/moonbats like to call a "paradox". I think you may need to open your eyes to the world of gray out there, I'm starting to get the idea that you have a very black and white view of things and that is coloring your responses.
I will admit that the black/white nature of COS has rubbed off on me. However, the only place I ever heard people calling Obama the anointed one is from wacky Republicans saying that we were saying that about him. Also, you didn't address the fact that so many eveangelicals are like Phelps and hate Canada. I you just trying to forget about that factor. The moment somebody insults Canada in front of me usually results in a massive argument.
Edit: I seen you post in the post espousing Tory positions. So another thing. Tell your Rep. friends to accept the election and shut up. Its only fair, because the Republicans said the same thing to us 4 years ago.
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
Usually in the US, if you attack Obama, you a person on the fascist right, or are on the extreme left. Also, my experiences in COS, capital of the evangelical movement, show that (most, I meant 3-4 good ones... out of hundreds) Evangelicals are every bit as vicious and Phelps and his ilk. They are hateful little cusses. It also ticked me off how so many of them hated Canada.
Such is my lot in life... I can't attack Obama without being compared to Mussolini, and I can't attack McCain without being compared to Stalin...
PS: there is such a thing as "liberal evangelicals"... people like Mother Teresa, who went around professing charity for the poor, etc etc... Conservative evangelical christians have the right idea in their hearts about spreading the Word of Jesus, but ultimately they're doing it wrong... and end up worrying about homosexuals more than the idea of "Love thy neighbor"...
ToadOfSteel wrote:
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
Usually in the US, if you attack Obama, you a person on the fascist right, or are on the extreme left. Also, my experiences in COS, capital of the evangelical movement, show that (most, I meant 3-4 good ones... out of hundreds) Evangelicals are every bit as vicious and Phelps and his ilk. They are hateful little cusses. It also ticked me off how so many of them hated Canada.
Such is my lot in life... I can't attack Obama without being compared to Mussolini, and I can't attack McCain without being compared to Stalin...
PS: there is such a thing as "liberal evangelicals"... people like Mother Teresa, who went around professing charity for the poor, etc etc... Conservative evangelical christians have the right idea in their hearts about spreading the Word of Jesus, but ultimately they're doing it wrong... and end up worrying about homosexuals more than the idea of "Love thy neighbor"...
Just because people say those "Liberal Evangelicals" exist doesn't mean they do. Like people saying Nessie exists. People say it does, but there are few sightings and no scientific evidence. Same with "Liberal Evangelicals," except there are no sightings at all. And I'm not talking about Evangelicals in the form of spreading faith. I'm talking about the Evangelical Movement, though more properly may be called Penteostals and Southern Baptists (who are hiding a sex scandal by the way.).
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
Basically, some inbred Republican hick from Topeka, Kansas says Canada is an evil country because they allow Gay Rights.
But not all Americans are crazy Republicans. Most of us are mild-mannered Moderates and Liberals. Many of which love Canada.
Actually, Phelps ran for public office as a Democrat in the late 80s. Before about 1980, the Democrats were the "conservative" party, especially in the South. In fact, Southern Democrats were more conservative than Republicans in the old days.
The 1980 presidential election was the first time that the Republican Party became synonymous with evangelicals.
But Phelps is not acting like a good Christian. Even Jerry Falwell said that anyone could repent and be saved, regardless of the type of sin committed.
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
I will admit that the black/white nature of COS has rubbed off on me. However, the only place I ever heard people calling Obama the anointed one is from wacky Republicans saying that we were saying that about him. Also, you didn't address the fact that so many eveangelicals are like Phelps and hate Canada. I you just trying to forget about that factor. The moment somebody insults Canada in front of me usually results in a massive argument.
Edit: I seen you post in the post espousing Tory positions. So another thing. Tell your Rep. friends to accept the election and shut up. Its only fair, because the Republicans said the same thing to us 4 years ago.
Edit: I seen you post in the post espousing Tory positions. So another thing. Tell your Rep. friends to accept the election and shut up. Its only fair, because the Republicans said the same thing to us 4 years ago.
The nature of being a libertarian, is that some of my positions are from the conservative playbook, some are from the liberal. For example, I doubt many "tories" would be in favor of the total drug legalization that I advocate, or would be very happy about my positions on gays, religion, obscenity, or abortion. Liberals, on the other hand are horrified by my insistence on toting around a gun, my economic positions, my dislike of intrusive government, and my offensive sense of humor. My friends, in general are not Republicans, since I live outside of Seattle and being a registered Republican out here is like being on the sex offender registry. Most of my friends are actually ultra left, and I often sharpen my arguments on them at late night coffee shop political debates. Any Republican friends that I have I made in gunsmith school, and they are scattered all over the country. I haven't really heard any bitching about "stolen" elections this time around, except for the whole "he's not a citizen" ridiculousness, and that really was coming from the fringe.
I don't typically hang out with evangelicals, but I truly doubt that even a significant number of them are like Phelps. When he came to Seattle once he barely made it out alive, and I've yet to meet ANYONE, Christian or otherwise who supports what he does. Just like I don't lump all environmentalists in with the people burning down university greenhouses and assaulting researchers, I don't smear an entire religion with it's most extreme member. I can't imagine that hatred of Canada is an evangelical teaching either, it's such a non-issue for most people in the US I just can't see it.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
Tim_Tex wrote:
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
Basically, some inbred Republican hick from Topeka, Kansas says Canada is an evil country because they allow Gay Rights.
But not all Americans are crazy Republicans. Most of us are mild-mannered Moderates and Liberals. Many of which love Canada.
Actually, Phelps ran for public office as a Democrat in the late 80s. Before about 1980, the Democrats were the "conservative" party, especially in the South. In fact, Southern Democrats were more conservative than Republicans in the old days.
The 1980 presidential election was the first time that the Republican Party became synonymous with evangelicals.
But Phelps is not acting like a good Christian. Even Jerry Falwell said that anyone could repent and be saved, regardless of the type of sin committed.
But before the 80's time period can be called history at this point. I think Phelps is a Republican today. Also, I haven't seen any Evangelicals denouncing these kind of actions, so they must approve of these actions, and ones like it.
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
But before the 80's time period can be called history at this point. I think Phelps is a Republican today. Also, I haven't seen any Evangelicals denouncing these kind of actions, so they must approve of these actions, and ones like it.
Jerry Falwell called him a "first rate nut" among other things, and many evangelical leaders have also denounced him. Only the most extreme actually buy into him, if you look at Christian websites they are pretty universal in denouncing him.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
Dox47 wrote:
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
But before the 80's time period can be called history at this point. I think Phelps is a Republican today. Also, I haven't seen any Evangelicals denouncing these kind of actions, so they must approve of these actions, and ones like it.
Jerry Falwell called him a "first rate nut" among other things, and many evangelical leaders have also denounced him. Only the most extreme actually buy into him, if you look at Christian websites they are pretty universal in denouncing him.
Prove it. Also, Falwell was a nut. But virtually no one in the Evangelical Community has ever denounced him for his views on 9/11. You're running out ways to dend yourself....
Edit: And prove to me that Evangelicals have denouced the hateful actions against gays. I positive you will not find any. Also, I will continue to attack the beliefs of Evangelicals until one of them apologizes for how I was treated in that hellhole called Colorado Springs.
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
Prove it. Also, Falwell was a nut. But virtually no one in the Evangelical Community has ever denounced him for his views on 9/11. You're running out ways to dend yourself....
Defend myself from what? I'm not an evangelical, I don't support Fred Phelps, I just happen to also not like overly broad generalizing either. Even though I'm not defending myself personally, here are just a few of the links that I found to prominent Christians denouncing Fred Phelps and WBC:
From the Chaplains office at a targeted university:
http://www.skeptictank.org/mghate1.htm
Oberlin University wrote:
The Christian community at Oberlin views it as a special affront. Rev. Steve Hammond has this to say: I find it particularly painful that Rev. Phelps calls himself a Christian.
From another Christian group:
http://godhatespornography.com/
GodHatesPornography wrote:
Dealing with Westboro Baptist Church and any such group:
1. Ignore them -- they thrive on attention; if possible, deprive them of any opportunity for attention (in some instances, newspapers refer to them only as a "group;" and most reputable news agencies no longer seek their views).
2. Shun them in all aspects of living -- have nothing to do with them personally, in the community or in business
3. Rebuke them -- this runs contrary to the first piece of advice, but as the group becomes increasingly incorrigible it may be necessary to confront them (as the Patriot Guard does)
+ Don't approach them with a nuanced argument. Their gospel is predicated upon simple proof-texts for which there is no limit.
+ Be direct: Their actions are despicable and sinful, just say it.
+ Understand their mindset. They are, in fact, sincere, only desperately led astray.
+ Speak their language. In other words, hit them where it hurts, namely...
1. Ignore them -- they thrive on attention; if possible, deprive them of any opportunity for attention (in some instances, newspapers refer to them only as a "group;" and most reputable news agencies no longer seek their views).
2. Shun them in all aspects of living -- have nothing to do with them personally, in the community or in business
3. Rebuke them -- this runs contrary to the first piece of advice, but as the group becomes increasingly incorrigible it may be necessary to confront them (as the Patriot Guard does)
+ Don't approach them with a nuanced argument. Their gospel is predicated upon simple proof-texts for which there is no limit.
+ Be direct: Their actions are despicable and sinful, just say it.
+ Understand their mindset. They are, in fact, sincere, only desperately led astray.
+ Speak their language. In other words, hit them where it hurts, namely...
From the horses mouth:
Southern Baptists wrote:
“The slogans that Fred Phelps and his group are promoting are unscriptural and very inappropriate,” says Dwayne Hastings, director of communications for the Southern Baptist Convention’s ethics and religious-liberty commission. “Southern Baptists stand on the word of God in believing that homosexuality is wrong and that, as the Bible says, it’s an abomination to God. But God does not hate the homosexual…. To those who are unaware of the orthodox Christian view of homosexuality, Fred Phelps presents a distorted and, in fact, perverted view of God’s word in his message of hate.”
- Condem Sin - and sinner, by Robert Stacy McCain. Insight on the News, Volume: 15. Issue: 30, August 16, 1999. Page 32
- Condem Sin - and sinner, by Robert Stacy McCain. Insight on the News, Volume: 15. Issue: 30, August 16, 1999. Page 32
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
Edit: And prove to me that Evangelicals have denouced the hateful actions against gays. I positive you will not find any. Also, I will continue to attack the beliefs of Evangelicals until one of them apologizes for how I was treated in that hellhole called Colorado Springs.
Most evangelicals don't consider Phelps to be a true Christian, and do their best to distance themselves from him.
From The Baptist Press:
http://bpnews.org/bpnews.asp?ID=21487
Baptist Press wrote:
Welch, the pastor of First Baptist Church in Daytona Beach, Fla., said Phelps and his followers “have gone far beyond reason in their efforts to use funerals of our fallen war heroes from Iraq to spotlight themselves.
“Southern Baptists have consistently condemned and officially distanced themselves from Phelps’ hate-filled activities," Welch said.
“It is incorrigible that any person for any reason would take such devastating advantage of broken hearted children, spouses, and parents, at a funeral of their loved one, to draw attention to themselves. Such an ignorant and uncaring disregard for people’s deep feelings will undoubtedly cut into raw nerves that will produce unpredictable negative results.”
“Southern Baptists have consistently condemned and officially distanced themselves from Phelps’ hate-filled activities," Welch said.
“It is incorrigible that any person for any reason would take such devastating advantage of broken hearted children, spouses, and parents, at a funeral of their loved one, to draw attention to themselves. Such an ignorant and uncaring disregard for people’s deep feelings will undoubtedly cut into raw nerves that will produce unpredictable negative results.”
And...
Baptist Press wrote:
Southern Baptist leaders have denounced Phelps’ "God hates fags" message multiple times.
In 2003 Phil Roberts, president of Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, told Baptist Press, "Southern Baptists ought to take it as a badge of honor that he would boycott [us]. The gay and lesbian community needs to realize the difference in attitude and ministry between Southern Baptists and people like Mr. Phelps."
Roberts called Phelps' views on homosexuals "heretical."
Also in 2003, Terry Fox, pastor of Immanuel Baptist Church in Wichita, Kan., preached a sermon in which he denounced Phelps' ministry.
"I have a conviction ... that the lifestyle of homosexuality is a lifestyle unacceptable to God," Fox said. "But I also have a conviction that somebody that is involved in homosexuality can turn away from that and come back to a saving knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ."
Phelps and his followers have picketed the SBC building in Nashville at least twice in recent years.
In 1999 messengers to the Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution that didn't mention Phelps by name but did say: "[W]e publicly denounce and deplore all violent attacks upon homosexuals, and that we express our abhorrence of the teaching that God hates any person on account of an immoral lifestyle." The resolution passed months after Phelps' church picketed the funeral of Matthew Shepard, the homosexual college student murdered in Wyoming.
--30--
-- With reporting by Michael Foust
To read more about the differences between Southern Baptists and Fred Phelps, visit http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=15606
In 2003 Phil Roberts, president of Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, told Baptist Press, "Southern Baptists ought to take it as a badge of honor that he would boycott [us]. The gay and lesbian community needs to realize the difference in attitude and ministry between Southern Baptists and people like Mr. Phelps."
Roberts called Phelps' views on homosexuals "heretical."
Also in 2003, Terry Fox, pastor of Immanuel Baptist Church in Wichita, Kan., preached a sermon in which he denounced Phelps' ministry.
"I have a conviction ... that the lifestyle of homosexuality is a lifestyle unacceptable to God," Fox said. "But I also have a conviction that somebody that is involved in homosexuality can turn away from that and come back to a saving knowledge of the Lord Jesus Christ."
Phelps and his followers have picketed the SBC building in Nashville at least twice in recent years.
In 1999 messengers to the Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution that didn't mention Phelps by name but did say: "[W]e publicly denounce and deplore all violent attacks upon homosexuals, and that we express our abhorrence of the teaching that God hates any person on account of an immoral lifestyle." The resolution passed months after Phelps' church picketed the funeral of Matthew Shepard, the homosexual college student murdered in Wyoming.
--30--
-- With reporting by Michael Foust
To read more about the differences between Southern Baptists and Fred Phelps, visit http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=15606
Ten minutes with Google and I've got plenty of things I supposedly wouldn't find, I could dig up a lot more, but I wouldn't want to rub it in. I remember you now, you're the one who had a bad experience in the past and are now holding a whole group of uninvolved people responsible. My advice to you is to get over it, you're going to have to live with these kinds of people one way or the other, and holding onto some past wrong that the majority of them had nothing to do with serves no purpose at all.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez
Hurricane_Delta wrote:
Just because people say those "Liberal Evangelicals" exist doesn't mean they do. Like people saying Nessie exists. People say it does, but there are few sightings and no scientific evidence. Same with "Liberal Evangelicals," except there are no sightings at all. And I'm not talking about Evangelicals in the form of spreading faith. I'm talking about the Evangelical Movement, though more properly may be called Penteostals and Southern Baptists (who are hiding a sex scandal by the way.).
The Evangelical Movement is Evangelicals in the form of spreading faith. There is a small sect within the movement that has the nutjob views you mention, and rather like the fascist, err, I mean "conservative", minority that's been running the US for the last 8 years, this small sect likes to proclaim that it represents the overall interests of the Evangelical movement, just like the fascist "conservatives" like to claim they represent the entire conservative base, or in extreme cases, the entire US. They accomplish this through fanaticism and power of volume; the fascist "conservatives" currently in power are creating a bigger government than even Bill Clinton's government, something real fiscal conservatives such as myself are strongly against, while the Jerry Falwell/Fred Phelps types are far louder because they're too busy shouting at people to actually go forth and love their neighbors as Jesus intended...
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Donald Trump Banned From Nation’s Secrets by Defying Ethics |
12 Nov 2024, 2:54 pm |
Trump still wants Canada and Greenland |
27 Jan 2025, 2:39 pm |
Autism Speaks Canada Closing Down! |
23 Jan 2025, 11:15 pm |
Looking For Affordable Housing Options (Canada) |
12 Jan 2025, 9:46 pm |