ouinon wrote:
Unless it is simply an advertising angle it suggests that significant numbers of black people find that the "normal" browsers do not sufficiently represent black people's presence, issues, or interests.
It is why there are magazines and TV channels for gay people, lesbians, etc; because they do not see themselves represented very often, or very accurately, in the mainstream media.
It suggests that there may be a conscious or unconscious racist bias to the main browsers, that most whites aren't aware of. It certainly hadn't occurred to me before, but now I think about it I realise that there might be.
I don't know much about how browsers work but if frequency of search affects the visibility/prioritisation of pages then if more white people have internet access than black people it could create a racial bias in their services.
.
So why is there not a "Gaygle" browser?
Actually.. thats a good idea. I'm copyrighting that.
Meh, this is just more positive discrimination BS. Where's the White-specific browser? Divisions made over colour are racist, simple as that.
_________________
"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart,
that you can't take part" [Mario Savo, 1964]