ToadOfSteel wrote:
Personally, I think that people shouldn't even be given names at birth, but rather get the right to choose one when they reach a certain age (age of majority, for instance)... that way people decide what's best for themselves, rather than the stupid "we know what's best for you" line parents love to use...
I disagree, we'd have our five year olds naming themselves after super heros or other things they see as fun as a child. And really it's not practical for a child to be nameless before they start school, unless you decide to just call them by their last names but then they'll learn that as their name. As far as I see it, most parents don't give their children outrageous names and if they do give you one, you'll most likely realize it and subscribe to a nickname of some sort.
slowmutant wrote:
I was named after a saint.
Me too!
_________________
Ignorance is surely not bliss, because if you are ignorant, you will ignore the bliss around you.