Page 2 of 3 [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

twoshots
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,731
Location: Boötes void

05 Feb 2009, 8:26 pm

sartresue wrote:
Heid and go seek topic

Same old tiresome argument...the Israelis are always held to a different standard than other nations.

There is a real nasty situation going on in Sri Lanka. Where is all the protest here over that?

People pay attention for two reasons I assume:
1) America has close ties with Israel, and
2) The middle east is to Europe as Mesoamerica is to the United States.


_________________
* here for the nachos.


Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

06 Feb 2009, 12:39 am

ruveyn wrote:
LePetitPrince wrote:


The turks were invaders , they weren't the owners of that land. Proclaim it as an Ottoman state doesn't make it a Turkish land , Lebanon was an Ottoman state for for three centuries , yet Turkish language never became the common language , neither the Turkish race.


Go back further. There were Samarians, Syrians, Romans, and even further: There were Canaanites, Hivites, Hittites, Jebusites, Amorites, Gergashites not to say anything of the Philistines who invaded from over the sea. Go back even further and you have cro-magnons and neanderthals. So who are the true owners of the land?

The answer is the same. The owners are those that posses and can defend their claim against contrary force or claims.

Now who are the true owners of North America? Or South America. Who are the true owners of Mexico? Well it sure ain't the Aztecs anymore.

The notion of true ownership is bogus from left to right, up to down and front to back.

ruveyn


Perfectly true. When the Nazis invaded private Jewish homes, tossed the inhabitants out into the street and took their precious jewelry and paintings and other valuable for their own, it proved the point exactly. When the Israelis chased the Arabs out of their villages and took the land for their own with no compensation, it was exactly the same procedure. If that's the world you like to live in.



Haliphron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,980

06 Feb 2009, 2:27 am

Sand wrote:
Khan_Sama wrote:
I've come across pictures depicting similarities between early Nazi confinement of Jews into Ghettos to the Palestinian situation. History always repeats itself.

As for Arab and Israeli growth rates, yes, it's true. Arabs have a much higher fertility rate. Forget the Arabs in the occupied territories, the 15% Arab citizens of Israel might become the majority in a few generations. The Arab-Israeli fertility ratio is 4:1.


So there is a heavy element of reality in the wish of the Arabs to screw the Israelis out of existence.


Of course. Thats basically what people do when they have the chance.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

06 Feb 2009, 6:59 am

You don't have to be a majority to be in control. The Sunnis were not the majority in Iraq. Many gulf state the number of foreigner outnumber the number of citizens by a large margin.

Pilipino workers in these gulf sates have little rights. Until recently they were effectively indentured labourers, because they couldn't leave without their employer’s permission. They also get deported after a certain age regardless of family ties.

In the case of the West Bank, it is so carved up with settlers, that many Palestinians are is such dire straights it is either starve or support he occupation.

The Palestinian authority has good reason to be sceptical. These settlers don’t exist without the roads and infrastructure and the protection of the army. Instead of trying to forcefully remove these settler’s they should simply should give them an ultimatum: They either behave like law abiding citizens and move back to Israel or become renegade and which point the roads and the infrastructure and security should be cut off just like it is for the Palestinians.

The Isrealis are still building these roads, so really they have no moral authority in this area.



ascan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,194
Location: Taunton/Aberdeen

06 Feb 2009, 8:49 am

history_of_psychiatry wrote:
I can't believe I was raised to support such a terrorist country. I wish I could take back every quarter I've given to Israeli charity.

I didn't view the clip linked to at the start of the thread, but as this is an obvious bash-Israel exercise I thought I'd throw this in. Okay, Israel/ Palestine may be the current cause célèbre, but it's not hard to find examples of injustice carried out in our name, for our defence, in a similar way to Israel's government acts in the interest of its population.

Here's one that's relevant to the British and those from the US:

A contributor to the site below wrote:
In the 1960s and 70s, Britain secretly and illegally threw the Chagos islanders off their islands, to make way for a US military base. In 2000 the courts ruled the eviction illegal, but the Government simply passed new orders bypassing the courts, and has just won an appeal to the Law Lords confirming its right to do this. The islanders are now looking to take their fight to the European Court of Human Rights...


http://domain1164221.sites.fasthosts.com/index.htm



history_of_psychiatry
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,105
Location: X

06 Feb 2009, 8:17 pm

ascan wrote:
history_of_psychiatry wrote:
I can't believe I was raised to support such a terrorist country. I wish I could take back every quarter I've given to Israeli charity.

I didn't view the clip linked to at the start of the thread, but as this is an obvious bash-Israel exercise I thought I'd throw this in. Okay, Israel/ Palestine may be the current cause célèbre, but it's not hard to find examples of injustice carried out in our name, for our defence, in a similar way to Israel's government acts in the interest of its population.

Here's one that's relevant to the British and those from the US:

A contributor to the site below wrote:
In the 1960s and 70s, Britain secretly and illegally threw the Chagos islanders off their islands, to make way for a US military base. In 2000 the courts ruled the eviction illegal, but the Government simply passed new orders bypassing the courts, and has just won an appeal to the Law Lords confirming its right to do this. The islanders are now looking to take their fight to the European Court of Human Rights...


http://domain1164221.sites.fasthosts.com/index.htm


True. Even though I am a proud American I can honestly admit that my country has done things I am not proud of. However, that doesn't mean I have to support some terrorist country just because it's inhabitants practice the religion that was pushed on me in my youth.


_________________
X


ascan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2005
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,194
Location: Taunton/Aberdeen

07 Feb 2009, 5:15 am

history_of_psychiatry wrote:
However, that doesn't mean I have to support some terrorist country just because it's inhabitants practice the religion that was pushed on me in my youth.

Israel has similar values to the the US and its allies in Europe. Israel's main adversaries generally have a belief system that's been manipulated to place the destruction of your country and those values as a central goal. If you have to support one side, is it not reasonable to support Israel?



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

07 Feb 2009, 7:43 am

ascan wrote:
history_of_psychiatry wrote:
However, that doesn't mean I have to support some terrorist country just because it's inhabitants practice the religion that was pushed on me in my youth.

Israel has similar values to the the US and its allies in Europe. Israel's main adversaries generally have a belief system that's been manipulated to place the destruction of your country and those values as a central goal. If you have to support one side, is it not reasonable to support Israel?


Considering what the USA did in Haiti, Panama, Nicaragua, and keeping in mind its policies of torturing prisoners in Cuba and other CIA prisons and the methods it used to take Texas from Mexico and the bulk of its territory from the American Indians I would have to agree with you entirely.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

07 Feb 2009, 11:13 am

ascan wrote:
history_of_psychiatry wrote:
However, that doesn't mean I have to support some terrorist country just because it's inhabitants practice the religion that was pushed on me in my youth.

Israel has similar values to the the US and its allies in Europe. Israel's main adversaries generally have a belief system that's been manipulated to place the destruction of your country and those values as a central goal. If you have to support one side, is it not reasonable to support Israel?

Yes because a the US has a law against holocaust denial with a prison sentence :wink:

It is funny those who criticised Germany over the last extradition farce wouldn't dare criticise Israel if they had known they have the same law.

One of the biggest myths put forward by the Jewish lobby (they choose to refer to themselves as the Jewish lobby, more actuate would be Jewish Israeli Nationalist lobby, who happen to reside in the US and should probably hand return their Israeli passports under citizenship rules) is that the US shares the same values as Israel. That is not so true. There are other countries that share US values but don’t get nearly as much support. The amount of influence the Jewish lobby gets is grossly disproportional to real national and public interest. The fact of the matter is these people play on victimology just like Palestinian groups do, except they are better at it an have had the support for longer and they are no longer living with widespread persecution.

There was a huge amount of guilt post WWII understandably, but it resulted in some very poor decisions and the world is still paying the price.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

07 Feb 2009, 11:21 am

The old you country is no better repost.

That won't do, because we are not all ardent nationalists and will criticise our governments. That doesn't get other countries out of jail. Sorry it doesn't work like that.



Abu_Zarqawi
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 138
Location: Jabal an-Nabi Shu'ayb

07 Feb 2009, 12:55 pm

as ruveyn succinctly pointed out, the issue of ownership is a BS argument anyway, whats relevant is that israeli government is subjecting the palestinian people to a measure of human, social and economic suffering that is no way proportionate to what palestinian armed groups have done to the israelis in the form of suicide bombings and rocket attacks. its a matter of humanism, not ownership or theft.

and of course that in no way excuses the conduct of the IDF



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

07 Feb 2009, 2:38 pm

0_equals_true wrote:
Yes because a the US has a law against holocaust denial with a prison sentence :wink:



Flat out false. Such a law would be in direct contradiction to the first amendment.

There is no law in the U.S. against denying the holocaust happened.

ruveyn



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

07 Feb 2009, 2:42 pm

ruveyn wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
Yes because a the US has a law against holocaust denial with a prison sentence :wink:



Flat out false. Such a law would be in direct contradiction to the first amendment.

There is no law in the U.S. against denying the holocaust happened.

ruveyn


Err...obviously I have to explain this: Israel does therefore the US does not share Israeli values. Gedit?



history_of_psychiatry
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,105
Location: X

07 Feb 2009, 4:30 pm

ruveyn wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
Yes because a the US has a law against holocaust denial with a prison sentence :wink:



Flat out false. Such a law would be in direct contradiction to the first amendment.

There is no law in the U.S. against denying the holocaust happened.

ruveyn


No, but in many parts of Europe there are. I personally believe that it was indeed around 6 million Jews killed. But I don't see why someone should be held accountable by law for stating an opinion. If holocaust deniers want to spout their crap, let them make asses of themselves.


_________________
X


0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

07 Feb 2009, 5:17 pm

Israel has this law. Would you like me to refer you to the statutes?

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Anti-Semitism ... 1986-.html



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

07 Feb 2009, 8:00 pm

0_equals_true wrote:
Israel has this law. Would you like me to refer you to the statutes?

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Anti-Semitism ... 1986-.html


But the U.S. does not.

ruveyn