Why so many Christians in an AS forum?
ToadOfSteel wrote:
Technically, Occam's Razor, at this point in human understanding, would favor religion. For example: The Big Bang is generally accepted as being the start point of the Universe. But what caused it? Humans have nothing beyond theories and assumptions. The prevailing theory right now is M-theory, which has to do with branes and what not. (I'm not going to go into detail about M-theory because I'd probably get it wrong...)
Anyway, following M-theory, there are a few assumptions about the creation of the universe because nothing has been proven about it:
1) The universe in its entirety lies on a brane, a multidimensional construct.
2) Universes are created when branes collide with each other.
That's a bit convoluted for my tastes. It's far simpler to say "God did it"... and since that is a simpler answer, Occam's razor would technically say that the latter is the more probable explanation. I emphasize "more probable" because it isn't necessarily the truth. If M-theory is proven, I would readily accept that. I guess, in the end, the point I'm trying to make isn't that Occam's Razor would favor relgiion over science, but rather that Occam's Razor is complete BS...
Anyway, following M-theory, there are a few assumptions about the creation of the universe because nothing has been proven about it:
1) The universe in its entirety lies on a brane, a multidimensional construct.
2) Universes are created when branes collide with each other.
That's a bit convoluted for my tastes. It's far simpler to say "God did it"... and since that is a simpler answer, Occam's razor would technically say that the latter is the more probable explanation. I emphasize "more probable" because it isn't necessarily the truth. If M-theory is proven, I would readily accept that. I guess, in the end, the point I'm trying to make isn't that Occam's Razor would favor relgiion over science, but rather that Occam's Razor is complete BS...
Actually, that can be debated, however, I did say "seems" rather than "is", so I was not trying to make some philosophical statement so much as a sociological one.
In any case, most non-religious people don't really try to take on the cosmological argument for God, but rather ignore it to take the existence of the universe as a brute fact. So, ascribing them the string theory view seems problematic. Instead they see the world this way: can all of the facts of the world I find relevant be explained(or even explained better) without appealing to something outside of a naturalistic conception? If yes, then no God. They say yes due to a lack of miracles, and due to the existence of a level of imperfection that is beyond what they think a powerful being would tolerate.
Finally, most conceptions of God are either complex, such as the Christian God who is triune, incarnated, having miraculous spiritual servants, performing past unverified miracles, having a complex moral system that disagrees with the intuitions of some, and having particular historical geographic bias, or they are just Gods of the gaps, such as the Deist God who only exists to solve the historical proofs of God and who has nothing else to recommend him and thus seems ad hoc. Perhaps you have shown that my set of metrics is underdeveloped, but it probably does work for the thought processes of atheists given that vibratetogether and anna-banana seem to support the idea that Ockham's razor favors atheism. Sand invokes ad hocness though, so I could be better supported by including that metric as well.
vibratetogether wrote:
Perhaps I was being naive, but I kind of figured the AS crowd would tend towards atheism or agnosticism. I know a lot of us make some pretty silly choices, but at the heart of it, I felt like we had a better "feel" for the way things actually work. We're so wrapped up in our own heads that we aren't as impressionable through rote demonstration and reinforcement.
So, I'm not really interested in hearing why you may or may not be Christian (or any other religion for that matter). I'd like to hear what you think regarding whether AS is more likely to make a person religious or not, and why.
One thing I have noticed is that the Christians on here do not seem to be moderate. Perhaps to them religion and faith is like poker and video games for me (AS-driven super hobbies).
So, I'm not really interested in hearing why you may or may not be Christian (or any other religion for that matter). I'd like to hear what you think regarding whether AS is more likely to make a person religious or not, and why.
One thing I have noticed is that the Christians on here do not seem to be moderate. Perhaps to them religion and faith is like poker and video games for me (AS-driven super hobbies).
I'm a moderate Christian (Lutheran).
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
There's been an upsurge in Christians recently. Usually there are many many more non-theists than theists.
In any case, I would say that for aspies, the advantage of having a religion is the following:
1) Upholds the conventions taught and identity given
2) Provides a worldview full of certitude
3) Is open to be analyzed
I would say that the push away from religion for aspies is the following:
1) Religion is presented to them in a manner that seems an aberration to their worldview
2) A non-religious hypothesis seems plausible and to uphold Ockham's razor
3) Non-religion is popular amongst rationalist intellectuals, a group that aspies often take interest in.
I'd say that a major issue with the PPR forum is that extreme views will often take the center stage, as moderates will both avoid the area as few moderates care to debate a view and it is easier to notice an extremist as opposed to a moderate. For some aspies, I would imagine that religion is their super-hobby.
In any case, I would say that for aspies, the advantage of having a religion is the following:
1) Upholds the conventions taught and identity given
2) Provides a worldview full of certitude
3) Is open to be analyzed
I would say that the push away from religion for aspies is the following:
1) Religion is presented to them in a manner that seems an aberration to their worldview
2) A non-religious hypothesis seems plausible and to uphold Ockham's razor
3) Non-religion is popular amongst rationalist intellectuals, a group that aspies often take interest in.
I'd say that a major issue with the PPR forum is that extreme views will often take the center stage, as moderates will both avoid the area as few moderates care to debate a view and it is easier to notice an extremist as opposed to a moderate. For some aspies, I would imagine that religion is their super-hobby.
Actually, I think the reason why some aspies(and other people with lifelong hardships)turn to religion has to do with the fact that faith helps people cope with things that they dont have any control over. Because being in touch with reality makes you keenly aware of that the fact that knowlege isnt always power.
Good replies so far. I think my future responses require coffee, so I will return shortly.
Update : Coffee-fueled edit coming shortly.
Quote:
if this forum had a "rep system", i'd "rep" you for this one.
This, that was a superb analogy Sand.
Quote:
I think it's generally harder for people with a more scientific data-based existence to accept the possibility of something they can't prove.
Well, I'm not technically atheist, I consider myself agnostic. I accept the possibility of just about anything. But I know what you're getting at. I have a great respect for science, and I might be more likely to look into theological possibilities if religion could find a way to co-exist with science. As is, it seems that science and religion are at odds with one another. There is an attempt to bridge this gap in Intelligent Design, but that actually turns me off even more, because ID is not held to a scientific standard (not even close).
Quote:
I supposed it's more likely that people who have a rough life would accept some kind of deity for guidance and moral support.
I definitely agree with this, but it's interesting. This would actually suggest to me that people with AS are more likely to find religion. My life hasn't been a massive struggle, but it hasn't been easy living in an NT world, and I know I'm not alone in this. The AS group I went to briefly had 5 other regulars, and I would say that only one of them was happy, and 2 were miserable.
Quote:
I'm not the insults-and-yelling kind of Christian, it's never worked in my experience, so that may make me moderate.
Well, considering your reply was very thoughtful and accepting of other world views, I would say you're moderate. I definitely appreciate this sort of candor over the ACCEPT JESUS NOW crowd.
Quote:
There are some of the extreme kind, of course, but I'm going to work on them.
Quote:
Then again, I've noticed there are a lot of insults-and-yelling atheists here, so it evens out.
Absolutely. Unfortunately, adopting an atheist or agnostic worldview does not instantly turn you into a good person, just as adopting a theistic worldview does not instantly turn you into a good person.
Quote:
As long as they don't use force, like the Muslims do, we can tolerate it.
I'm somewhat offended by this. Although the American version of Christianity is generally non-violent (with the exception of some abortion activists), Christianity has a history of as much violence, if not more, than the Muslim faith. Just as there are moderate and extremist Christians, there are moderate and extremist Muslims. It is very unfair to paint their entire faith as forceful or violent, as it is not.
Quote:
I still kind of secretly suspect the Christians here to be non-genuine aspies...
You know, I actually had a sneaking suspicion of this as well at first glance.
Quote:
*hides behind the OP*
*constructs non-theist force field*
Quote:
plus, I think that religion is essentially Theory of Mind gone too far. ToM helps humans perceive others as sentient beings, but also to see their intentions (how they do it, I don't know- my own ToM is rather poor). so if a person looks around and sees someone's intention in everyhting, I think that such thinking is a by-product of the ToM.
I think you just went over my head a little, which doesn't seem to happen very often. I feel like I can see people's intentions, but considering I see most people's intentions as selfish or evil (my version of evil), it may just be a manifestation of my cynicism.
Quote:
Technically, Occam's Razor, at this point in human understanding, would favor religion.
I don't think I agree with this. To me, using Occam's Razor results in agnosticism. Saying "God did it" is quite simple, but it brings up a lot of other questions that complicate things quickly. My simple truth is this : theistic knowledge is intangible, humans cannot comprehend the intangible, and therefore humans cannot have theistic knowledge, it's merely experience and opinion.
Quote:
What you are leaving out is that some people cannot stand that some questions cannot be answered at a particular state of knowledge so they shove in anything to fill the emptiness. Its like some guy forgot his key so he must put something in the keyhole and shoves in a piece of chewing gum. It doesn't open the door but it settles his unhappiness at having an empty keyhole. And forever after the damned door remains closed because the keyhole is so gummed up.
You are the undisputed king of analogies.
Quote:
and where did God come from? what is he made of? why did he create the Universe?
the "God" explanation is not simpler, it only appears to be because of the limitations of the human brain in the imagination part.
the "God" explanation is not simpler, it only appears to be because of the limitations of the human brain in the imagination part.
Hey, I just said that!
Quote:
They say yes due to a lack of miracles, and due to the existence of a level of imperfection that is beyond what they think a powerful being would tolerate.
This X1000. I've tried to put myself into the mindset of a Christian, and the conclusion I came to was that if there is a Christian god, a Christian heaven and a Christian hell, then God is an as*hole. **** that guy.
Quote:
I'm a moderate Christian (Lutheran).
Father was Catholic, mother was Christian (also Lutheran I think). I was actually raised Unitarian and later Unitarian Universalist. I think I actually turned my parents away from religion (though going from Catholic/Christian to Unitarian Universalist shows they were on the path).
Quote:
lol this isn't Twitter! Wink
Real-time message boards ftw.
Quote:
I hope it's real ground coffee not that instant stuff.
I am spoiled, drip-coffee from coffee stand place.
Last edited by vibratetogether on 28 Mar 2009, 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
anna-banana wrote:
vibratetogether wrote:
Good replies so far. I think my future responses require coffee, so I will return shortly.
Update : Coffee-fueled edit coming shortly.
Update : Coffee-fueled edit coming shortly.
lol this isn't Twitter!
I hope it's real ground coffee not that instant stuff. Now there is a topic for PPR, we can argue the virtues of instant vs real coffee
I'm a believer - I believe in using ground coffee. Mmmm smell that coffee.
_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.
TallyMan wrote:
anna-banana wrote:
vibratetogether wrote:
Good replies so far. I think my future responses require coffee, so I will return shortly.
Update : Coffee-fueled edit coming shortly.
Update : Coffee-fueled edit coming shortly.
lol this isn't Twitter!
I hope it's real ground coffee not that instant stuff. Now there is a topic for PPR, we can argue the virtues of instant vs real coffee
I'm a believer - I believe in using ground coffee. Mmmm smell that coffee.
instant coffee is not coffee! I keep my beans in the fridge, preserves the smell
_________________
not a bug - a feature.
just stumbled upon this article that seems to proove my theory
Quote:
The brain scans showed that people use known, higher-function brain regions to sort out their thoughts on God and religion. For instance, parts of the brain linked with theory of mind (ToM) lit up when trying to understand a supposedly detached God's intentions - although individual minds varied wildly when pondering a more involved God.
A possible explanation: "Probably because we would tend to use theory of mind when we were puzzled, concerned, or threatened by another's behavior," Grafman told LiveScience.
People again relied on theory of mind, as well as brain regions that detect emotion through facial expression and language, when they read statements reflecting God's anger. Statements of God's love stimulated regions connected with positive emotions and suppression of sadness...
A possible explanation: "Probably because we would tend to use theory of mind when we were puzzled, concerned, or threatened by another's behavior," Grafman told LiveScience.
People again relied on theory of mind, as well as brain regions that detect emotion through facial expression and language, when they read statements reflecting God's anger. Statements of God's love stimulated regions connected with positive emotions and suppression of sadness...
feels good to be right :p
anyway, that's another proof for why people with ASDs are less prone to religious beliefs.
_________________
not a bug - a feature.
I am a very logical minded aspie and I was as religious upto the age of 24. The obvious doubt such as,' if there was a god how comes I cannot see him or if there is a god, why do bad things happen' did not and still isn't a solid argument. However, I did become an atheist by logic that many of you guys are unaware of or question that you never thought of.
vibratetogether wrote:
Perhaps I was being naive, but I kind of figured the AS crowd would tend towards atheism or agnosticism. I know a lot of us make some pretty silly choices, but at the heart of it, I felt like we had a better "feel" for the way things actually work. We're so wrapped up in our own heads that we aren't as impressionable through rote demonstration and reinforcement.
So, I'm not really interested in hearing why you may or may not be Christian (or any other religion for that matter). I'd like to hear what you think regarding whether AS is more likely to make a person religious or not, and why.
One thing I have noticed is that the Christians on here do not seem to be moderate. Perhaps to them religion and faith is like poker and video games for me (AS-driven super hobbies).
So, I'm not really interested in hearing why you may or may not be Christian (or any other religion for that matter). I'd like to hear what you think regarding whether AS is more likely to make a person religious or not, and why.
One thing I have noticed is that the Christians on here do not seem to be moderate. Perhaps to them religion and faith is like poker and video games for me (AS-driven super hobbies).
I don't think being aspie has got any relation to being or being not religious. We find our way through life as every human being does, looking for a sense or giving up about it being possible. Above all we are individuals. As far as I am concerned, I believe there is a sense, I admit I wouldn't be able to carry on in a meaning less life. I find it very human, and an aspie is still human, don't you think?
Dismissing religious beliefs as being "silly choices" or due to lack of "a better feel for the way things actually work" it's quite naive (at least). Those are not moderate thoughts. Maybe you can reelaborate saying that you do not share the religious point of view about life and reality.
I never forget we are dwarfs standing on the shoulder of giants ("One who develops future intellectual pursuits by understanding the research and works created by notable thinkers of the past"; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_o ... _of_giants).
Religion is quite a deep and complex issue everybody can make an opinion about. Aspies included.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
New to the forum and the reality of ASD |
02 Jan 2025, 7:01 pm |
forum post likely to increase polarization |
28 Dec 2024, 12:54 pm |
Finally managed to join the forum! |
21 Jan 2025, 11:30 pm |