vibratetogether wrote:
Super-awesome question.
I would say he does not believe in God, but he also does not not believe in God. I know that's a double negative, but here's one of my AS quirks, I find meaning in most double negatives.
He does not purport knowledge of God, but he also does not purport knowledge of no God.
Well, the nihilist has abolished God and all concepts related to God, so even referring to one's own nihilism means that God does not exist(for most variants of self-proclaimed nihilist). I mean, there are many forms of nihilism:
existential nihilism- meaning does not exist, therefore God does not exist
mereological nihilism- objects with parts do not exist, and the perception of them is just a brain issue where we do not see the parts.
epistemological nihilism- is an extreme form of skepticism in which all knowledge is denied
moral nihilism- no moral values exist, ergo no God exists
metaphysical nihilism- no objects exist in either another possible world, or even existence does not exist
(other forms, but often similar to mereological nihilism, in that they just remove one property of the world as they see it as silly, I think one is perforational nihilism, where holes do not really exist)
Now a mereological nihilism is compatible with God. In fact, I think Christian philosopher Peter van Inwagen holds to mereological nihilism, as it only has to do with composite objects, such as chairs and such do not really exist. (I think human beings are assumed to have emergent properties)
Epistemological nihilism and extreme metaphysical nihilism might be agnostic simply because knowledge is assumed not to exist.
Milder variants of metaphysical nihilism will probably be nihilist, as God controls all possible worlds, so nothing existing would not be a possibility.
Existential and moral nihilism are considered incompatible with nihilism, and those 2 are often what we label people as being nihilist with.
Very few people claim to be epistemological nihilists as they could not have then said they were. Metaphysical nihilists exist but claim they don't exist and so wouldn't call themselves nihilists. So the agnostic forms of nihilism would never admit to being there.
Now, I would bet that ZEGH is not referring to being a mereological nihilism, although he might be fine admitting that there isn't some "chairness" that makes what he is sitting on to be a chair. I think he refers to a moral or existential nihilism where necessary properties for God's existence do not exist.