An invitation into a convoluted thought process.

Page 2 of 3 [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

24 Apr 2009, 3:42 pm

Thank you for your replies. I enjoy seeing both sides of the coin. I will try to respond more tomorrow. I am feeling odd about posting today, as I have been upset by a fortune cookie. I have no idea why I am so ealily offended by the messages in fortune cookies, but it seems most times I am. I really should give them up, but they are so delightfully crunchy and good.



merrymadscientist
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 533
Location: UK

24 Apr 2009, 3:43 pm

Racism per se is not inherent, but prefering ones 'own' people, over others (whether this is race, religion, neurological type even) is a natural human trait which it is difficult (if not impossible) to get over. Humans evolved in small groups - it was evolutionary evantageous to protect one's own group at the expense of other groups. We can't get out of this mentality easily. We may live in a globalised society, where the people closest to us might be the other side of the world, but in the end we will still prefer people like us (in whatever sense is most important to us) and be inherently suspicious of those not like us.



Ancalagon
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2007
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,302

24 Apr 2009, 5:02 pm

ThisisjusthowItalk wrote:
We must shove diversity down our own throats, our children's throats, and each other's throats because it's not something we take to very naturally.

I disagree. It is part of human nature to rebel against things shoved down our throats.

I think people who want to reduce racism could make more progress if they simply explained what diversity really meant. Diversity is about appreciating the differences between different types of people, not between different races. Extroverts and introverts, male and female, young and old, blonde and brunette, American and European, theist and atheist, intellectual and artist -- they all have something you don't have, and you have something that they don't.

Instead, political interests have defined diversity to mean having a certain "correct" proportion of a certain attribute called "race". In so doing, they diminish diversity to a mere buzzword, and emphasize the importance of the mostly arbitrary categorization of race.

Claire -- I think you are using the word "racist" in a very different way than I would. I wouldn't say that all forms of generalization, stereotyping, or bias are racist. It is natural to have a bias towards those like you, near you, or related to you. This isn't even bad, as long as you don't take it to the point of hating outsiders. It's also natural to generalize about other people -- trying to consider each individual person from scratch in each and every situation is just way to much computation to be feasible with a human brain. It's not a bad thing, as long as it's reasonable, and the generalizations are flexible enough to change if there is evidence they aren't true.

I still recall vividly how shocked I was when I first saw Shaun of the Dead -- it had a black guy with a British accent. Intellectually, I knew that there are black people in Britain, and that British people have British accents, so logically there was no reason for surprise, but it still shocked me. I think of it as a rather funny failure of generalization, not as racist.


_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton


ThisisjusthowItalk
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 24 Mar 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 106

24 Apr 2009, 5:31 pm

Ancalagon wrote:
ThisisjusthowItalk wrote:
We must shove diversity down our own throats, our children's throats, and each other's throats because it's not something we take to very naturally.

I disagree. It is part of human nature to rebel against things shoved down our throats.
I didn't. When I was five years old and just starting Kindergarten, the teachers immediately started drilling tolerance into my young, impressionable head, and I have never rejected it in the least. I've actually taken to it very well, and I appreciate the wisdom in it.

Quote:
I think people who want to reduce racism could make more progress if they simply explained what diversity really meant. Diversity is about appreciating the differences between different types of people, not between different races. Extroverts and introverts, male and female, young and old, blonde and brunette, American and European, theist and atheist, intellectual and artist -- they all have something you don't have, and you have something that they don't.

Instead, political interests have defined diversity to mean having a certain "correct" proportion of a certain attribute called "race". In so doing, they diminish diversity to a mere buzzword, and emphasize the importance of the mostly arbitrary categorization of race.
Well, I actually think you've got a good, strong point right there. I do think that a more broad understanding of what constitutes diversity would be in our best interests.

Quote:
I still recall vividly how shocked I was when I first saw Shaun of the Dead -- it had a black guy with a British accent. Intellectually, I knew that there are black people in Britain, and that British people have British accents, so logically there was no reason for surprise, but it still shocked me. I think of it as a rather funny failure of generalization, not as racist.
Actually, one thing that I WILL say of myself is that my attitudes on "race" are a little bit weird. You see, where I grew up, the "black people" mostly held a lot of the same attitudes and manners of dress. However, there were people in my life who were black of skin without really fitting in that little niche that had the label, "black guy." In fact, now that I am attending college, I haven't seen a single "black guy" even though there are obviously plenty of people in my classes who are technically "black people."

I know that sounds like a bit of a mindtrip, but it's how my mind tends to operate. I don't call it "acting white" like some people do, though: I call it, "not copying or identifying with people who pride themselves in being bums and criminals." That's not "white." It's just...respectable. "Respectable people" don't have a skin color. They have an attitude. They have an outlook. For me, in any case, we're really all the same bunch.

Even so, people who fit a certain stereotype, whether they're white or black, tend to call up the same images of annoying or outright unpleasant hip-hop figures.



claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

24 Apr 2009, 9:16 pm

Fortune cookie episode has subsided, so here I go...

ruveyn wrote:
There is an innate preference for "one's own kind".

merrymadscientist wrote:
Racism per se is not inherent, but prefering ones 'own' people, over others (whether this is race, religion, neurological type even) is a natural human trait which it is difficult (if not impossible) to get over.
You have both made similar statements, so I will reply to them together. This may be a very big part of the problem I have with internally processing these things, since I have never had an 'own kind'. I have not ever been able to truly identify with a race. Sure, I get upset when people start spouting racial stereotypes about Indians, but I also get upset when people paint Germans with the same wide nazi brush. My father was a German immigrant, drove a Japanese import, and worked for a large America union...needless to say he caught his share of crap. He was a child during WWII, but some people just could not get that. Racist homopobe...yes. Evil nazi...no. I also get upset when people makes drunken Irish remarks. My Irish grandmother was no drunk, neither is my Irish husband.



Last edited by claire-333 on 24 Apr 2009, 9:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

24 Apr 2009, 9:17 pm

monty wrote:
A thought experiment:
I am not certain how to reply to this, because your thought experiment seems to be just as much about culture as race. Are mixed race children inherently racist? I might say yes. I recognize it in my own and also used to work in the school system and witnessed it there too. Afer a culture has merged into one? One race or one culture? If it is one race...maybe yes, but not recognized until exposed to another race. As for eye color...I have trouble understanding your point. This is not how people usually recognize race in others. Overall outward features are how people are identified, even if these features are from a small portion of their ethnicity, as in my case. But the trouble I have with this post may just be the way my brain works. I have trouble with hypotheticals. It is much easier for me to consider what is, rather than what might be.



claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

24 Apr 2009, 9:18 pm

mixtapebooty wrote:
I think that racial distinctions are innate in the human populous. With that said, racism will always exist, whether it be an environmental tool established on fear, or a cultural norm of a familial group, or whatever the cause of it is. I don't think it is incorrect to say that in general, racism is innate in human beings. There is a potential inside every single human being to form a racist idea, thought, or behavior. Action does not define all forms and manners in which people are racist. There are many different types of racism and attitudes that constitute support of racism in its different forms. There is no need to label everyone "a racist", or even one's self if it isn't really an outward focus. I find it valuable to self regulate any negative thoughts or opinions that I may form about a race or culture. I have a very racist family, but I find their attitudes and opinions unacceptable. That isn't to say that I've never felt a sense of my upbringing in my own experience with people of other races. I forgo labeling myself "a racist", altogether, even though I inherited a racist family. I choose not to break myself down that way.
I appreciate your confirmation, even though you take offense to the label of racist. I mean really...who wants such a negative title? This is why I made sure to point out I am willing to consider I might be wrong, since I realize I need to label everyone this way to be able to accept it in others.



claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

24 Apr 2009, 9:18 pm

MissConstrue wrote:
Claire, I apologize because I failed to mention that I also grew up around black people. My family knew one guy in particular that would bring his nieces over to play with us. So I was already exposed to colored people early on in my life. Maybe a reason why it didn't take me by surprise in school. As for remembering it back in childhood, I really don't....not that I can go that far back to when I was 3 and before then. It wasn't much of an issue until I was much older.

I'm still confused about this issue. I know that we all have prejudices we're willing not to accept and I think you brought up a good taboo subject but I guess with my problem, I have trouble being articulate. Whenever I come up with a controversial topic, I have to choose my words carefully which is still hard for me. One of the many reasons I steer clear of them unless I have it all thought out carefully and willing to back up my arguements because yes people will argue especially here in the PPR forum.

My only question I guess that's boggling me is what you mean by accepting.

Racism can be expressed in many ways. Some people don't express them overtly like others. I had to accept that from my granny even though she never expressed out loud and didn't hate all black people.

So I guess what I'm trying to get at is the question of acceptance. If my child did what your child did, you're right I wouldn't punish her or get all crazy since it's what she experienced and it might've been natural unless she heard it from someone else in school. I would however, educate her that it's wrong to treat people differently based on the color of their skin just as my mom did.

So therein, lies the irony of acceptance.
I think you did mention you were exposed to other races at a young age, but lots of people are and I question the impact as well one's ablility to recall these thought processes from such a young age. No need to apologize to me at all. I know this is a mixed up topic for me.

Acceptance? ...to receive without adverse reaction. Your acceptance of your white grandmother's racism is a different process than me accepting my white grandmother's racism. Thanks for getting all taboo with me. :D



claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

24 Apr 2009, 9:19 pm

ThisisjusthowItalk wrote:
No. People are not inherently racist. People are simply taught starting very early in their careers as people that a "human being" is a "certain kind of thing." In fact, it is our responsibility as parents to safeguard against this by trying to expose them to a variety of different kinds of people, so they won't grow up to feel confused whenever they are around black people, indians, Indians, Han Chinese, Kazakhs, Azeri, etc.. It is very cruel to teach our young, "a person looks like this," and then expect that child to take easily to being around people who do not fit that description. If a child was never taught that it is "normal" for some people to be black, then that child is going to always feel that there is something just not quite right about those black people. They were given a certain standard to go by, and it should be no surprise that they think people who don't quite match have something wrong with them. This is not some despicable aspect of human behavior, and it is not fair to judge people for it. The learning process is not a perfect or flawless thing. We should keep ourselves acutely aware of this fact, or we will screw ourselves up.

To succeed in avoiding racist behavior, we must teach ourselves a certain level of cognitive flexibility from early on. We must shove diversity down our own throats, our children's throats, and each other's throats because it's not something we take to very naturally. It is not a normal thing in our evolutionary history to be surrounded by people who look almost like completely different species. It is not natural, organic, or environmentally friendly to try to swallow the fact that two individuals who look no more alike than a wolf and a coyote are really members of exactly the same species and in every possible respect equal to one another. In fact, it's really not fair at all that we are born into a world that is so confusing and apparently inane. The only thing that makes it better is trying to get used to it as early as possible, so we don't feel like we're taking a cold shower every time we hear some strange, weird thing with dark, black skin that makes it look like it's turning into a grape open its mouth and start talking to us in perfect English.

No, racism is NOT inherent. In fact, it's not our fault that life insists on being strange, convoluted, and nonsensical all the time. That's why most of us think it's easier to go through life believing that some super-entity has it all under control and has some hidden purpose for all the madness. I don't hold this belief, but I honestly can't blame people who do. If it helps keep you feeling sane in this great, vast swamp, I won't begrudge you it.
Much like pandd's response...very thought provoking and giving me pause for further thought. My inital reaction is to disagree that racism is caused by not enough exposure to what other races look like. There are many very racist people who have had this exposure all their lives. I will read your post again later, to see if I get a different meaning from it without trying to process your thoughts along with all of the others.



claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

24 Apr 2009, 9:20 pm

Ancalagon wrote:
Claire -- I think you are using the word "racist" in a very different way than I would. I wouldn't say that all forms of generalization, stereotyping, or bias are racist.
Not all forms, just the ones which imply superiority or inferiority.
Ancalagon wrote:
It is natural to have a bias towards those like you, near you, or related to you. This isn't even bad, as long as you don't take it to the point of hating outsiders. It's also natural to generalize about other people -- trying to consider each individual person from scratch in each and every situation is just way to much computation to be feasible with a human brain. It's not a bad thing, as long as it's reasonable, and the generalizations are flexible enough to change if there is evidence they aren't true.
I agree, these things are very natural...this is the point I am making. Is it even really that bad if it is taken to the point of hating others, if one does not act on it?



claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

24 Apr 2009, 9:21 pm

ThisisjusthowItalk wrote:
Actually, one thing that I WILL say of myself is that my attitudes on "race" are a little bit weird.
I will opt for the term 'weird' also, in order to refrain from profanity. :lol:
ThisisjusthowItalk wrote:
You see, where I grew up, the "black people" mostly held a lot of the same attitudes and manners of dress. However, there were people in my life who were black of skin without really fitting in that little niche that had the label, "black guy." In fact, now that I am attending college, I haven't seen a single "black guy" even though there are obviously plenty of people in my classes who are technically "black people."
You know, I totally relate to blacks in the respect of not wanting to take part in behavior that fits a stereotype. Did you know there are some blacks who refuse to eat watermellon? Oprah once did a show on it years ago. I found it quite sad that a person cannot even feel comfortable enjoying a peice of fruit without considering if it will make them the butt of someone else's joke. It made me have serious questions about my own refusal to wear silver jewelry. Not to even mention my strong distaste for crap like beadwork and turquoise. :?



vibratetogether
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 589
Location: WA, USA

24 Apr 2009, 10:05 pm

I wouldn't sweat it Claire. Everyone has certain prejudices that they learn through experience (or lack of it). In my view, this is natural, and not wholly abominable. As long as you have an open mind, accept that you could be wrong in your prejudices, and generally have a love for all people, you're good to go.



claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

24 Apr 2009, 11:11 pm

vibratetogether wrote:
I wouldn't sweat it Claire.
Some of the time I do not, but this us usually acheived by avoiding people in general. It seems it most always is an issue to consider with human interaction.
vibratetogether wrote:
Everyone has certain prejudices that they learn through experience (or lack of it). In my view, this is natural, and not wholly abominable. As long as you have an open mind, accept that you could be wrong in your prejudices...you're good to go.
This is where I have been going all along.
vibratetogether wrote:
and generally have a love for all people,
I had to pull this bit out...I tend to be leery, but working on it.



pandd
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,430

25 Apr 2009, 11:08 am

claire333 wrote:
Pandd also made this same arguement. Since it has been mentioned twice, I guess I should address it. I also do not recall being aware of racial differences as a small child.

I recall being unaware that physical variation was of any 'racial' significance, and recall my early muddled and vague early misconceptions, when I first became aware that there was some association between particular physical traits and "race".

I do find many tasks that entail making sense of visual information rather challenging, including facial recognition, and I suspect I was developmentally constrained from developing the kind of racial awareness that tends to follow from the "visibility" of "race".

In retrospect I was atypical in this respect. My peers probably could make "racial inductions" based on physical characteristics for years before I could, and I was once derided by some class-mates for making the mistake of asking another child how they knew someone in a film we had been shown was Chinese. That was the year I turned eight.



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 98
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

25 Apr 2009, 11:21 am

pandd wrote:
claire333 wrote:
Pandd also made this same arguement. Since it has been mentioned twice, I guess I should address it. I also do not recall being aware of racial differences as a small child.

I recall being unaware that physical variation was of any 'racial' significance, and recall my early muddled and vague early misconceptions, when I first became aware that there was some association between particular physical traits and "race".

I do find many tasks that entail making sense of visual information rather challenging, including facial recognition, and I suspect I was developmentally constrained from developing the kind of racial awareness that tends to follow from the "visibility" of "race".

In retrospect I was atypical in this respect. My peers probably could make "racial inductions" based on physical characteristics for years before I could, and I was once derided by some class-mates for making the mistake of asking another child how they knew someone in a film we had been shown was Chinese. That was the year I turned eight.


I have known and respected all sorts of people from all sorts of ethnic and racial backgrounds all my life and never had any feeling about or cause to treat them other than as simply other people. Perhaps I am unusual.



claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

25 Apr 2009, 11:51 am

pandd wrote:
I recall being unaware that physical variation was of any 'racial' significance, and recall my early muddled and vague early misconceptions, when I first became aware that there was some association between particular physical traits and "race".

I do find many tasks that entail making sense of visual information rather challenging, including facial recognition, and I suspect I was developmentally constrained from developing the kind of racial awareness that tends to follow from the "visibility" of "race".

In retrospect I was atypical in this respect. My peers probably could make "racial inductions" based on physical characteristics for years before I could, and I was once derided by some class-mates for making the mistake of asking another child how they knew someone in a film we had been shown was Chinese. That was the year I turned eight.
I was thinking more about this yesterday. Like you, I simply do not recall being aware of these things, but I was so unaware of my own self it would make sense I was also unaware of others. I did not realize I did not look like others until it was pointed out to me. It was not until my early teens that I became aware of clothing, when someone made fun of me for mine. Before that age, I do not remember clothes.