An invitation into a convoluted thought process.
Thank you for your replies. I enjoy seeing both sides of the coin. I will try to respond more tomorrow. I am feeling odd about posting today, as I have been upset by a fortune cookie. I have no idea why I am so ealily offended by the messages in fortune cookies, but it seems most times I am. I really should give them up, but they are so delightfully crunchy and good.
Racism per se is not inherent, but prefering ones 'own' people, over others (whether this is race, religion, neurological type even) is a natural human trait which it is difficult (if not impossible) to get over. Humans evolved in small groups - it was evolutionary evantageous to protect one's own group at the expense of other groups. We can't get out of this mentality easily. We may live in a globalised society, where the people closest to us might be the other side of the world, but in the end we will still prefer people like us (in whatever sense is most important to us) and be inherently suspicious of those not like us.
I disagree. It is part of human nature to rebel against things shoved down our throats.
I think people who want to reduce racism could make more progress if they simply explained what diversity really meant. Diversity is about appreciating the differences between different types of people, not between different races. Extroverts and introverts, male and female, young and old, blonde and brunette, American and European, theist and atheist, intellectual and artist -- they all have something you don't have, and you have something that they don't.
Instead, political interests have defined diversity to mean having a certain "correct" proportion of a certain attribute called "race". In so doing, they diminish diversity to a mere buzzword, and emphasize the importance of the mostly arbitrary categorization of race.
Claire -- I think you are using the word "racist" in a very different way than I would. I wouldn't say that all forms of generalization, stereotyping, or bias are racist. It is natural to have a bias towards those like you, near you, or related to you. This isn't even bad, as long as you don't take it to the point of hating outsiders. It's also natural to generalize about other people -- trying to consider each individual person from scratch in each and every situation is just way to much computation to be feasible with a human brain. It's not a bad thing, as long as it's reasonable, and the generalizations are flexible enough to change if there is evidence they aren't true.
I still recall vividly how shocked I was when I first saw Shaun of the Dead -- it had a black guy with a British accent. Intellectually, I knew that there are black people in Britain, and that British people have British accents, so logically there was no reason for surprise, but it still shocked me. I think of it as a rather funny failure of generalization, not as racist.
_________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." --G. K. Chesterton
I disagree. It is part of human nature to rebel against things shoved down our throats.
Instead, political interests have defined diversity to mean having a certain "correct" proportion of a certain attribute called "race". In so doing, they diminish diversity to a mere buzzword, and emphasize the importance of the mostly arbitrary categorization of race.
I know that sounds like a bit of a mindtrip, but it's how my mind tends to operate. I don't call it "acting white" like some people do, though: I call it, "not copying or identifying with people who pride themselves in being bums and criminals." That's not "white." It's just...respectable. "Respectable people" don't have a skin color. They have an attitude. They have an outlook. For me, in any case, we're really all the same bunch.
Even so, people who fit a certain stereotype, whether they're white or black, tend to call up the same images of annoying or outright unpleasant hip-hop figures.
Fortune cookie episode has subsided, so here I go...
Last edited by claire-333 on 24 Apr 2009, 9:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I'm still confused about this issue. I know that we all have prejudices we're willing not to accept and I think you brought up a good taboo subject but I guess with my problem, I have trouble being articulate. Whenever I come up with a controversial topic, I have to choose my words carefully which is still hard for me. One of the many reasons I steer clear of them unless I have it all thought out carefully and willing to back up my arguements because yes people will argue especially here in the PPR forum.
My only question I guess that's boggling me is what you mean by accepting.
Racism can be expressed in many ways. Some people don't express them overtly like others. I had to accept that from my granny even though she never expressed out loud and didn't hate all black people.
So I guess what I'm trying to get at is the question of acceptance. If my child did what your child did, you're right I wouldn't punish her or get all crazy since it's what she experienced and it might've been natural unless she heard it from someone else in school. I would however, educate her that it's wrong to treat people differently based on the color of their skin just as my mom did.
So therein, lies the irony of acceptance.
Acceptance? ...to receive without adverse reaction. Your acceptance of your white grandmother's racism is a different process than me accepting my white grandmother's racism. Thanks for getting all taboo with me.
To succeed in avoiding racist behavior, we must teach ourselves a certain level of cognitive flexibility from early on. We must shove diversity down our own throats, our children's throats, and each other's throats because it's not something we take to very naturally. It is not a normal thing in our evolutionary history to be surrounded by people who look almost like completely different species. It is not natural, organic, or environmentally friendly to try to swallow the fact that two individuals who look no more alike than a wolf and a coyote are really members of exactly the same species and in every possible respect equal to one another. In fact, it's really not fair at all that we are born into a world that is so confusing and apparently inane. The only thing that makes it better is trying to get used to it as early as possible, so we don't feel like we're taking a cold shower every time we hear some strange, weird thing with dark, black skin that makes it look like it's turning into a grape open its mouth and start talking to us in perfect English.
No, racism is NOT inherent. In fact, it's not our fault that life insists on being strange, convoluted, and nonsensical all the time. That's why most of us think it's easier to go through life believing that some super-entity has it all under control and has some hidden purpose for all the madness. I don't hold this belief, but I honestly can't blame people who do. If it helps keep you feeling sane in this great, vast swamp, I won't begrudge you it.
I wouldn't sweat it Claire. Everyone has certain prejudices that they learn through experience (or lack of it). In my view, this is natural, and not wholly abominable. As long as you have an open mind, accept that you could be wrong in your prejudices, and generally have a love for all people, you're good to go.
I recall being unaware that physical variation was of any 'racial' significance, and recall my early muddled and vague early misconceptions, when I first became aware that there was some association between particular physical traits and "race".
I do find many tasks that entail making sense of visual information rather challenging, including facial recognition, and I suspect I was developmentally constrained from developing the kind of racial awareness that tends to follow from the "visibility" of "race".
In retrospect I was atypical in this respect. My peers probably could make "racial inductions" based on physical characteristics for years before I could, and I was once derided by some class-mates for making the mistake of asking another child how they knew someone in a film we had been shown was Chinese. That was the year I turned eight.
I recall being unaware that physical variation was of any 'racial' significance, and recall my early muddled and vague early misconceptions, when I first became aware that there was some association between particular physical traits and "race".
I do find many tasks that entail making sense of visual information rather challenging, including facial recognition, and I suspect I was developmentally constrained from developing the kind of racial awareness that tends to follow from the "visibility" of "race".
In retrospect I was atypical in this respect. My peers probably could make "racial inductions" based on physical characteristics for years before I could, and I was once derided by some class-mates for making the mistake of asking another child how they knew someone in a film we had been shown was Chinese. That was the year I turned eight.
I have known and respected all sorts of people from all sorts of ethnic and racial backgrounds all my life and never had any feeling about or cause to treat them other than as simply other people. Perhaps I am unusual.
I do find many tasks that entail making sense of visual information rather challenging, including facial recognition, and I suspect I was developmentally constrained from developing the kind of racial awareness that tends to follow from the "visibility" of "race".
In retrospect I was atypical in this respect. My peers probably could make "racial inductions" based on physical characteristics for years before I could, and I was once derided by some class-mates for making the mistake of asking another child how they knew someone in a film we had been shown was Chinese. That was the year I turned eight.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Discriminatory hiring process? |
10 Jan 2025, 7:29 pm |
Work is Mad I Automated a Process. |
06 Dec 2024, 1:48 pm |
I thought she was my friend |
17 Dec 2024, 8:40 am |
I thought she was interested, but she rejected me |
02 Dec 2024, 5:39 pm |