Drake wrote:
Spiderpig wrote:
The age of consent should be renamed. It should be made clear its purpose is not just to protect minors from sexual abusers, but to make sure they don't get sexual release in any way, shape or form, simply because older and wiser people don't want them to, and optionally reinforce this with religion or anything else that imbues their personal taste of unquestionable moral authority.
It shouldn't be a fixed age, either. It probably should never be lower than 20, maybe 25, maybe 30, but, in any case, you should be required to prove you're an independent and non-dysfunctional adult; better yet, that you've been one for ten years. It should cost money so you prove you can afford it, and, needless to say, receiving any kind of government handout whatsoever should disqualify you for life. Living at your parents' home, or any other family members', or getting any kind of financial support from them past the age of 18 should disqualify you for life, too.
Anyone caught having sex in violation of these rules, or with reasonable evidence to suspect they've done it, should be immediately castrated.
Good luck trying to enforce that.
Tell me that is some sort of satire post.
I hope so too, because honestly, I think most people lose their virginities some time in their mid-late teens. Not saying it's something I necessarily endorse, but it's not really unusual considering that mere thousands of years ago, maybe even a bit less, people were lucky to make it to their 40s. The age of consent here is 16, which I think makes sense. Teenagers have raging hormones, and they make mistakes, but they shouldn't be penalized for it, especially not the way that was described. Instead, they should be taught about safe sex, and making good choices.
_________________
Every day is exactly the same...