A different subject I’d like to talk about
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
The challenge with getting this right, as the OP I think stated correctly, is that destroying lives of teens isn't a good idea unless something really bizarre is happening (senior and a freshmen, ie. school peers, is a lot different than a 19 and 12 year old for example where the social bridge is a lot harder to explain). Similarly we consider it creepy if 50-somethings are having relationships with 18 year olds but it's technically legal. This is where these laws do need nuance because destroying lives, especially while letting the people in question live to old age with ruined lives and little opportunity for real redemption of any kind, is not only heinous but it creates criminals (ie. similarly perverse to throwing someone in jail for marijuana possession when this isn't applied wisely).
I’m happy with the law as it currently stands which is good because I don’t think it’s going to change. (I also don’t think this is an “extreme feeling.”)
Any changes or “nuances” will put more children at risk. There needs to be firm boundaries and that bar needs to be set somewhere. I like it’s current location. 19 year olds should not be having sex with 14 year olds. It’s creepy.
Twilightprincess wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
The challenge with getting this right, as the OP I think stated correctly, is that destroying lives of teens isn't a good idea unless something really bizarre is happening (senior and a freshmen, ie. school peers, is a lot different than a 19 and 12 year old for example where the social bridge is a lot harder to explain). Similarly we consider it creepy if 50-somethings are having relationships with 18 year olds but it's technically legal. This is where these laws do need nuance because destroying lives, especially while letting the people in question live to old age with ruined lives and little opportunity for real redemption of any kind, is not only heinous but it creates criminals (ie. similarly perverse to throwing someone in jail for marijuana possession when this isn't applied wisely).
I’m happy with the law as it currently stands which is good because I don’t think it’s going to change. (I also don’t think this is an “extreme feeling.”)
Any changes or “nuances” will put more children at risk. There needs to be firm boundaries and that bar needs to be set somewhere. I like it’s current location. 19 year olds should not be having sex with 14 year olds. It’s creepy.
You seem to be focused on a 19 year old having sex with a 14 year old than being focused on the other story where a minor snuck into an adult club and lied about her age and had sex with a 18 year old. I wonder where is the law in this to protect adults from minors raping them by lying about their age and using fake IDs and sneaking into adult clubs. Why isn't there an investigation for this when it happens?
You are not consenting to sex when you are being lied to. This is manipulation the minor is using to coarse the adult to sleeping with them. This is something I would not have done as a minor only because I knew then the adult gets in trouble and not you and it doesn't matter if you trick the adult by pretending to be 18 when you are 15.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
Only a sociopathic teen would have sex with an adult if they knew the adult would get in trouble with the law no matter what so they lie about their age anyway and sneak into adult clubs and have sex with young adults. Why? Because they don't care. They are not victims here when they do this and I judge them harshly for it, they are not victims when they exploit the law for their own use and not care what dangers they put the adult in by lying about their age because they wanted to open their legs.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
League_Girl wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
The challenge with getting this right, as the OP I think stated correctly, is that destroying lives of teens isn't a good idea unless something really bizarre is happening (senior and a freshmen, ie. school peers, is a lot different than a 19 and 12 year old for example where the social bridge is a lot harder to explain). Similarly we consider it creepy if 50-somethings are having relationships with 18 year olds but it's technically legal. This is where these laws do need nuance because destroying lives, especially while letting the people in question live to old age with ruined lives and little opportunity for real redemption of any kind, is not only heinous but it creates criminals (ie. similarly perverse to throwing someone in jail for marijuana possession when this isn't applied wisely).
I’m happy with the law as it currently stands which is good because I don’t think it’s going to change. (I also don’t think this is an “extreme feeling.”)
Any changes or “nuances” will put more children at risk. There needs to be firm boundaries and that bar needs to be set somewhere. I like it’s current location. 19 year olds should not be having sex with 14 year olds. It’s creepy.
You seem to be focused on a 19 year old having sex with a 14 year old than being focused on the other story where a minor snuck into an adult club and lied about her age and had sex with a 18 year old. I wonder where is the law in this to protect adults from minors raping them by lying about their age and using fake IDs and sneaking into adult clubs. Why isn't there an investigation for this when it happens?
You are not consenting to sex when you are being lied to. This is manipulation the minor is using to coarse the adult to sleeping with them. This is something I would not have done as a minor only because I knew then the adult gets in trouble and not you and it doesn't matter if you trick the adult by pretending to be 18 when you are 15.
Adults are legally responsible to make sure that the person they are sleeping with is of age. That’s just how it is and will always be.
If they wanted to make a loophole about this, pedos would find ways to work the system to get out of trouble.
Kids make stupid decisions. It’s our responsibility as adults to look out for them. We need to make double and triple sure that the people we sleep with are adults.
League_Girl wrote:
Only a sociopathic teen would have sex with an adult if they knew the adult would get in trouble with the law no matter what so they lie about their age anyway and sneak into adult clubs and have sex with young adults. Why? Because they don't care. They are not victims here when they do this and I judge them harshly for it, they are not victims when they exploit the law for their own use and not care what dangers they put the adult in by lying about their age because they wanted to open their legs.
You can be as judgmental as you like, but you aren’t a psychologist and can’t diagnose people that you read about in a biased article with sociopathy.
You have no idea what the child’s motives were.
Quote:
Adults are legally responsible to make sure that the person they are sleeping with is of age. That’s just how it is and will always be.
This is so absurd, how is an adult going to know when they meet another young woman their age in an adult website or in a adult only club and how are they going to know their ID is fake?
Just because there are laws doesn't mean they are messed up by how they are written, it's called critical thinking. You challenge it when you see flaws than just going along with it.
There is a difference between a teen being stupid and a teen being fully aware of the law but chooses to do it anyway because they do not care about the adult. If I understood this as a teen, they are capable of understanding this as well after being known about this. You would have to not give a s**t about adults as a child if you knew this law as a minor. I was all about justice and fairness and would get upset if I heard about anyone being taken advantage of and manipulated. Maybe because it happened to me as a child and the adults didn't give a s**t when kids would harass me and manipulate me and egg me on.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
Twilightprincess wrote:
Adults are legally responsible to make sure that the person they are sleeping with is of age. That’s just how it is and will always be.
I’ve already written something in this thread to debunk that:CubsBullsBears wrote:
After thinking about it, there is another way that I can at least understand the laws that put people on the registry without intent; if schools teach students about those laws, and what it’s like to live as a sex offender. That way they know to be super careful, having proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the person they’re about to hook up with is of age.
But we all know that’s not the case. Reading Shakespeare books and determining the degree of an angle is somehow more important. That is why I’m so defensive of people who get tricked into committing statutory rape and why I don’t understand how the opposing POV makes any sense.
But we all know that’s not the case. Reading Shakespeare books and determining the degree of an angle is somehow more important. That is why I’m so defensive of people who get tricked into committing statutory rape and why I don’t understand how the opposing POV makes any sense.
_________________
Early 20s male with Asperger’s and what feels like a mood disorder
Twilightprincess wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
Only a sociopathic teen would have sex with an adult if they knew the adult would get in trouble with the law no matter what so they lie about their age anyway and sneak into adult clubs and have sex with young adults. Why? Because they don't care. They are not victims here when they do this and I judge them harshly for it, they are not victims when they exploit the law for their own use and not care what dangers they put the adult in by lying about their age because they wanted to open their legs.
You can be as judgmental as you like, but you aren’t a psychologist and can’t diagnose people that you read about in a biased article with sociopathy.
You have no idea what the child’s motives were.
If you are okay with a teen doing this, I am so disturbed. This should not be okay and by law they are allowed to do this.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
Twilightprincess wrote:
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
The challenge with getting this right, as the OP I think stated correctly, is that destroying lives of teens isn't a good idea unless something really bizarre is happening (senior and a freshmen, ie. school peers, is a lot different than a 19 and 12 year old for example where the social bridge is a lot harder to explain). Similarly we consider it creepy if 50-somethings are having relationships with 18 year olds but it's technically legal. This is where these laws do need nuance because destroying lives, especially while letting the people in question live to old age with ruined lives and little opportunity for real redemption of any kind, is not only heinous but it creates criminals (ie. similarly perverse to throwing someone in jail for marijuana possession when this isn't applied wisely).
I’m happy with the law as it currently stands which is good because I don’t think it’s going to change. (I also don’t think this is an “extreme feeling.”)
Any changes or “nuances” will put more children at risk. There needs to be firm boundaries and that bar needs to be set somewhere. I like it’s current location. 19 year olds should not be having sex with 14 year olds. It’s creepy.
They need to change the age of consent to 18 in the UK.
_________________
"A loaded gun won't set you free. So you say." - Ian Curtis
League_Girl wrote:
Quote:
Adults are legally responsible to make sure that the person they are sleeping with is of age. That’s just how it is and will always be.
This is so absurd, how is an adult going to know when they meet another young woman their age in an adult website or in a adult only club and how are they going to know their ID is fake?
Just because there are laws doesn't mean they are messed up by how they are written, it's called critical thinking. You challenge it when you see flaws than just going along with it.
I don’t see flaws with the system. I think it’s fine as it is. Sure, unfortunate scenarios could happen, but I believe that it’s more important to protect children.
It’s quite possible that this slanted article is leaving out relevant facts as well - a point that no one seems to care about even though it contains some red flags.
Adults do need to be vigilant about making sure that the person they are with is a legal adult.
League_Girl wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
Only a sociopathic teen would have sex with an adult if they knew the adult would get in trouble with the law no matter what so they lie about their age anyway and sneak into adult clubs and have sex with young adults. Why? Because they don't care. They are not victims here when they do this and I judge them harshly for it, they are not victims when they exploit the law for their own use and not care what dangers they put the adult in by lying about their age because they wanted to open their legs.
You can be as judgmental as you like, but you aren’t a psychologist and can’t diagnose people that you read about in a biased article with sociopathy.
You have no idea what the child’s motives were.
If you are okay with a teen doing this, I am so disturbed. This should not be okay and by law they are allowed to do this.
I never said that I was “okay” about this.
I said that teenagers sometimes make stupid decisions. This would be one of them. It’s important to note that teenagers are not adults, though. They are prone to making irrational, risky decisions because their frontal cortex isn’t yet fully formed.
Quote:
Adults do need to be vigilant about making sure that the person they are with is a legal adult.
That means don't trust women, assume every woman is out to get you and is evil and is going to exploit the law and is lying about their age and using fake ID. Only go after older women who are obviously not a teenager or under 25, doesn't matter if you are under 25 yourself. Trust no women. Don't go inside them. I am happy with this misogyny here with any man that practices this principal.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
League_Girl wrote:
Quote:
Adults do need to be vigilant about making sure that the person they are with is a legal adult.
That means don't trust women, assume every woman is out to get you and is evil and is going to exploit the law and is lying about their age and using fake ID. Only go after older women who are obviously not a teenager or under 25, doesn't matter if you are under 25 yourself. Trust no women. Don't go inside them. I am happy with this misogyny here with any man that practices this principal.
There was no misogyny because I used gender neutral terms. It applies to both sexes.
Last edited by TwilightPrincess on 17 Jul 2022, 12:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Anyone else was mentally unable to talk? |
15 Jan 2025, 4:13 pm |
I get upset when other people talk about my diagnoses
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
16 Nov 2024, 5:28 pm |
Was/is it taboo to talk about your dating life with others? |
08 Dec 2024, 6:50 pm |
Talk Show host Wendy Williams is in very bad shape |
27 Nov 2024, 5:14 pm |