Page 11 of 93 [ 1477 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 93  Next

Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 1:13 pm

Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Conversely, 1) I tell you about how sex shouldn't be taken casually, while you 2) really, really, REALLY don't care!


i just reread that....... that's BS and quite stupid to say. im not the one trivializing sexual preferences yet putting the weight of eternal damnation on it like it's so simple...

To review, no eternal damnation comes from a gland-induced sensation leading to a desire (like me physically being attracted to women). The damnation comes in not catching that and praying to God to help you with it, but rather saying "f.you God" then turning around and whining "God is mean". :roll:


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 1:16 pm

Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
and i think it's stupid you sad you treat this like anything else unimportant to you........ (ESPECIALLY when you put words into God's mouth! gotta be a sin in there somewhere)

In regard to the phase I bolded, to what are you referring?


can you keep nothing straight?

im referring to your claims of meshing evolution with the will of god.... when clearly dont dont even believe in the CORE concepts of evolution

with your literal interpretation of things... it's illogical and blasphemous (to god and evolution) to do so

:lol:
Sedaka wrote:
people who take less literal intepretations of the bible have no qualms putting the two together

but it's deceving and thoughtless (cause you dont seem to care about trivial points) on your behalf to make such gossamar statements


You're seeing "devils, devils everywhere", and I don't know what you're ranting about.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

08 Aug 2007, 1:28 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Conversely, 1) I tell you about how sex shouldn't be taken casually, while you 2) really, really, REALLY don't care!


i just reread that....... that's BS and quite stupid to say. im not the one trivializing sexual preferences yet putting the weight of eternal damnation on it like it's so simple...

To review, no eternal damnation comes from a gland-induced sensation leading to a desire (like me physically being attracted to women). The damnation comes in not catching that and praying to God to help you with it, but rather saying "f.you God" then turning around and whining "God is mean". :roll:


im so tired of your smartass eye rolling.....

im not stupid i know were not talking about the urges..... we're talking about what your religion expects homosexual people to do about these urges in order to repent... to live a lifestyle approved by god

my point is it's not that simple to expect them to do that...... it's forced. (refer to my example where i asked you if you EVER prayed to god to be attracted to men just to avoid your sexual lust/attraction to women... cause that's effectively what you're asking homosexuals to do)

and you ignored my previous points on this... so im not going back through it all.

suffice it to say... you have no logical way to navigate those waters THAT you have clearly demonstrated

the fact this is like the 3rd or 4th time you bring up the "urge does not equal sin" point shows that you are far behind the times or are ignoring these other "trivial" points


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

08 Aug 2007, 1:30 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Why are you so obsessed with the sex part of it?

'Cause that's what it's about. Otherwise, they're just friends.

BS. What about asexual couples who don't have sex? I wouldn't suggest that your relationships are solely based on sex, therefore why are you so convinced that a gay relationship is all about sex? If I had a girlfriend who, for whatever reason, didn't want to have sex, I wouldn't then consider her to be only a friend. There are more differences between a friendship and a romantic relationship than just sex.


Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
What about a gay couple who only have oral sex or neither?

Women are better at sucking a penis than men are. Please don't ask me to go into the depths, as it were, of their silky mouths, and their natural subtle eroticism which so inflames us. Men suck more like they're playing professional sports, or working out, than like they're actually making sweet, sweet love to their partners.

And you would know this how exactly?



Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

08 Aug 2007, 1:35 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
and i think it's stupid you sad you treat this like anything else unimportant to you........ (ESPECIALLY when you put words into God's mouth! gotta be a sin in there somewhere)

In regard to the phase I bolded, to what are you referring?


can you keep nothing straight?

im referring to your claims of meshing evolution with the will of god.... when clearly dont dont even believe in the CORE concepts of evolution

with your literal interpretation of things... it's illogical and blasphemous (to god and evolution) to do so

:lol:
Sedaka wrote:
people who take less literal intepretations of the bible have no qualms putting the two together

but it's deceving and thoughtless (cause you dont seem to care about trivial points) on your behalf to make such gossamar statements


You're seeing "devils, devils everywhere", and I don't know what you're ranting about.


you're like a squirrel who cannot remember where he put his nuts.......

must be nice not having to worry about such trivial stuff.


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

08 Aug 2007, 1:40 pm

Sopho wrote:
What about a gay couple who only have oral sex or neither?


technically oral sex is sodomy.........

so ragtime shouldnt have any carnal knoweldge of this either...

or he should at the very least be screaming, "oh god im sorry" in the midst of it

and afterward

edit: oral/anal sex and pretty much anything that is not "vanilla" is considered sodomy and thus homosexuality shouldnt even be necesaary to consider it a sin... so i dont see how caring whether men or women are better at performing either has any relevance...


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Last edited by Sedaka on 08 Aug 2007, 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 1:43 pm

Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
and i think it's stupid you sad you treat this like anything else unimportant to you........ (ESPECIALLY when you put words into God's mouth! gotta be a sin in there somewhere)

In regard to the phase I bolded, to what are you referring?


can you keep nothing straight?

im referring to your claims of meshing evolution with the will of god.... when clearly dont dont even believe in the CORE concepts of evolution

with your literal interpretation of things... it's illogical and blasphemous (to god and evolution) to do so


I know you love evolution (sort of a make-shift deity to you?), but I don't think someone can blaspheme it.

You're getting emotional because I'm trivilizing the thing you most hold dear, and that's understandable.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

08 Aug 2007, 1:52 pm

Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
and i think it's stupid you sad you treat this like anything else unimportant to you........ (ESPECIALLY when you put words into God's mouth! gotta be a sin in there somewhere)

In regard to the phase I bolded, to what are you referring?


can you keep nothing straight?

im referring to your claims of meshing evolution with the will of god.... when clearly dont dont even believe in the CORE concepts of evolution

with your literal interpretation of things... it's illogical and blasphemous (to god and evolution) to do so


I know you love evolution (sort of a make-shift deity to you?), but I don't think someone can blaspheme it.

You're getting emotional because I'm trivilizing the thing you most hold dear, and that's understandable.


i use using the term figuratively... as i am up to speed on definitions

you couldnt even comprehend my beliefs if i tried to explain... evolution does not encompass my beliefs nor does it compass yours


i get emotional cause you're being obtuse and uncooperative...


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

08 Aug 2007, 1:53 pm

Ragtime-you just gotta understand that, well especially Soph and I, could care less of "god"
I mean I respect you are a christian, I used to be one too...But your really just yaking about god and this and that why you think its wrong
give someone else a chance to reply :lol:
seriously



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 1:54 pm

Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
i am disappointed that you still havent really tried to improve your rebuttals and still implement ignoring things and giving glib responses that do not contribute...

I'm not a student in your classroom. I had a teacher friend who talked to me the way you are, and she apologized for it because she was shifting into "teacher mode" unaware.
Sedaka wrote:
you know, it's not even necessarily a bad thing to admit you dont have the answer for something....

that at least would show you are giving soem sort of true consideration for things

I already admitted I don't understand evo theory in detail.


ill apologize when you admit what blatant ignorant ass that you're being...

Image
Sedaka wrote:
you dont have a logical reason for why homosexuality is a sin and why it's not something that just goes away when you want...

If you can manage to willfully keep away from other people's naked genetalia, then homosexuality has gone away from you as far as the Bible is concerned. That willfulness involves trying to curb your lust as well. We're above beasts, and we should act like it.
Sedaka wrote:
your little example and "comparison" of the nature of the sins (which you now back out of) had no logic whatsoever...

I don't back out of it. You just don't receive points you don't want to receive.
Sedaka wrote:
you cant fathom homosexuality as you have claimed

That's a wild enough claim to be untrustworthy -- especially since I know my own thoughts better than you know my thoughts. :o


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

08 Aug 2007, 1:56 pm

lemmie ask you something-are people like me-Soph and Chuck Panozzo bad people for being gay/bi/whatever?
be honest...



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 2:00 pm

Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Conversely, 1) I tell you about how sex shouldn't be taken casually, while you 2) really, really, REALLY don't care!


i just reread that....... that's BS and quite stupid to say. im not the one trivializing sexual preferences yet putting the weight of eternal damnation on it like it's so simple...

To review, no eternal damnation comes from a gland-induced sensation leading to a desire (like me physically being attracted to women). The damnation comes in not catching that and praying to God to help you with it, but rather saying "f.you God" then turning around and whining "God is mean". :roll:


im so tired of your smartass eye rolling.....

im not stupid i know were not talking about the urges..... we're talking about what your religion expects homosexual people to do about these urges in order to repent...
Uh, ya: Pray about them. Is that so much? And if they have gay sex a couple more times after they've become a Christian, God still forgives them for that, and so should any church worth its salt. That's pretty tolerant!


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

08 Aug 2007, 2:03 pm

yes but wat if the people dont want to not have sex with those they are attracted to-why should they be forced to change?



Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 2:07 pm

Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Why are you so obsessed with the sex part of it?

'Cause that's what it's about. Otherwise, they're just friends.

BS. What about asexual couples who don't have sex?

I'd consider them friends. I love my friends very deeply; there's just no sex.
Sopho wrote:
I wouldn't suggest that your relationships are solely based on sex

Sex would be quite central to any relationship of mine, even though that sex would be in the future.
Sopho wrote:
therefore why are you so convinced that a gay relationship is all about sex? If I had a girlfriend who, for whatever reason, didn't want to have sex, I wouldn't then consider her to be only a friend.

Then, in what capacity would she be your girlfriend? I think you're over-intellectualizing friendships/relationships. They don't have THAT MANY damn dimensions.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Ragtime
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Nov 2006
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,927
Location: Dallas, Texas

08 Aug 2007, 2:14 pm

Sopho wrote:

Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
What about a gay couple who only have oral sex or neither?

Women are better at sucking a penis than men are. Please don't ask me to go into the depths, as it were, of their silky mouths, and their natural subtle eroticism which so inflames us. Men suck more like they're playing professional sports, or working out, than like they're actually making sweet, sweet love to their partners.

And you would know this how exactly?


I've been sucked. :D But only by my wife.


_________________
Christianity is different than Judaism only in people's minds -- not in the Bible.


Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

08 Aug 2007, 2:15 pm

so you know s**t :roll: