Page 103 of 108 [ 1723 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106 ... 108  Next

League_Girl
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,280
Location: Pacific Northwest

03 Feb 2019, 4:30 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:



Man, this was hilarious. Sadly this is the attitude I see online from SJWs. If I had a therapist like that, I would fire her before the session even ended and not pay her. She was also gaslighting in it. I know it was all acting. I watched another video by them and it had the same actors in it again except the therapist was playing the teacher and the patient was the immigrant student trying to learn American English and the teacher was trying to teach pronouns to all her students and they were all getting confused.


_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.

Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.


Skilpadde
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2008
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 27,019

03 Feb 2019, 5:50 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
Hilarious! :lol:


_________________
BOLTZ 17/3 2012 - 12/11 2020
Beautiful, sweet, gentle, playful, loyal
simply the best and one of a kind
love you and miss you, dear boy

Stop the wolf kills! https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeact ... 3091429765


Drake
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,577

03 Feb 2019, 6:33 am

Well, it could be worse, I thought she was going to tell him to actually kill himself.

She pulled off that insufferable self-righteous superiority so well.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

03 Feb 2019, 10:41 am

XenoMind wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
Oh, I didn't exactly say it was "impossible."

That's what you wrote, literally:

Quote:
Quote:
All these things can be analyzed, and are analyzed. :wink:

Not through the lens of "hard" science.


I "literally" didn't use the word "impossible."


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

04 Feb 2019, 11:23 am

XenoMind wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Really? That is YOUR interpretation, not mine.
It's your definition. You wrote, literally: ""Hard" science involves experiments which are relatively easy to set up". Experiments in quantum physics are very, very far from "easy to setup". That's it.
Fnord wrote:
don't you know any of these?
I see that you know many scientific words, that's for sure. I doubt that you really understand those words.
All of those devices and experiments are quantum-based -- these examples are also easier to set up and consistently replicate than the average sociologic experiment.

I performed the double-slit experiment and several photo-electric experiments in my third year of high school. I built my first vacuum-tube transmitter at the age of ten, and my first bipolar-transistor amplifier at the age of eight. I worked with fixed-wavelength and tunable lasers at university, where I also wrote research papers on negative dynamic resistance, Schottky diodes, and various noise sources in cryogenically-cooled amplifiers. All of this contributed to me earning a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering degree.

What is your "claim to fame"?



karathraceandherspecialdestiny
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Jan 2017
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,857

04 Feb 2019, 10:21 pm

Fnord wrote:
XenoMind wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Really? That is YOUR interpretation, not mine.
It's your definition. You wrote, literally: ""Hard" science involves experiments which are relatively easy to set up". Experiments in quantum physics are very, very far from "easy to setup". That's it.
Fnord wrote:
don't you know any of these?
I see that you know many scientific words, that's for sure. I doubt that you really understand those words.
All of those devices and experiments are quantum-based -- these examples are also easier to set up and consistently replicate than the average sociologic experiment.

I performed the double-slit experiment and several photo-electric experiments in my third year of high school. I built my first vacuum-tube transmitter at the age of ten, and my first bipolar-transistor amplifier at the age of eight. I worked with fixed-wavelength and tunable lasers at university, where I also wrote research papers on negative dynamic resistance, Schottky diodes, and various noise sources in cryogenically-cooled amplifiers. All of this contributed to me earning a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering degree.

What is your "claim to fame"?


Image



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

05 Feb 2019, 9:23 am

Image

Image

That's right ...



SaveFerris
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,762
Location: UK

05 Feb 2019, 9:32 am

Fnord wrote:
Image

Image

That's right ...


Image


_________________
R Tape loading error, 0:1

Hypocrisy is the greatest luxury. Raise the double standard


XenoMind
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 684
Location: Absurdistan

05 Feb 2019, 5:39 pm

XFilesGeek wrote:
XenoMind wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
Oh, I didn't exactly say it was "impossible."

That's what you wrote, literally:

Quote:
Quote:
All these things can be analyzed, and are analyzed. :wink:

Not through the lens of "hard" science.


I "literally" didn't use the word "impossible."


Well, great. So you're ready to admit that all those subjects can be successfully studied through the lens of "hard" science?



XenoMind
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 684
Location: Absurdistan

05 Feb 2019, 5:47 pm

Fnord wrote:
I performed the double-slit experiment and several photo-electric experiments in my third year of high school. I built my first vacuum-tube transmitter at the age of ten, and my first bipolar-transistor amplifier at the age of eight. I worked with fixed-wavelength and tunable lasers at university, where I also wrote research papers on negative dynamic resistance, Schottky diodes, and various noise sources in cryogenically-cooled amplifiers. All of this contributed to me earning a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering degree.

And did you build all the required equipment on your own? You don't have to asnwer, that was a rhetoric question. You just took several factory produced parts, each worth hundreds man-years if you had to produce it from scratch, and combined them together.
On the other hand, you only need a group of random people to conduct an experiment in psychology.

Fnord wrote:
What is your "claim to fame"?

My claim to fame: I know quite a few things about rational thinking and logic, and you have no idea about those ;)



XenoMind
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 684
Location: Absurdistan

05 Feb 2019, 5:49 pm

karathraceandherspecialdestiny wrote:


By the way, did you enjoy your little circle-j*rking session?



karathraceandherspecialdestiny
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Jan 2017
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,857

05 Feb 2019, 5:55 pm

XenoMind wrote:
karathraceandherspecialdestiny wrote:


By the way, did you enjoy your little circle-j*rking session?


You shouldn't project your masturbatory activities onto others like that, it's unsightly. I don't have anything to jerk in a circle or otherwise, so I'll have to say no to your gross inappropriate question.



XenoMind
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 684
Location: Absurdistan

05 Feb 2019, 6:00 pm

karathraceandherspecialdestiny wrote:
You shouldn't project your masturbatory activities onto others like that, it's unsightly. I don't have anything to jerk in a circle or otherwise, so I'll have to say no to your gross inappropriate question.

But I don't. I just see what you two are doing here.
By the way, let me help you learn some new things. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/circle-jerk



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 6 May 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,939
Location:      

05 Feb 2019, 7:44 pm

XenoMind wrote:
Fnord wrote:
I performed the double-slit experiment and several photo-electric experiments in my third year of high school. I built my first vacuum-tube transmitter at the age of ten, and my first bipolar-transistor amplifier at the age of eight. I worked with fixed-wavelength and tunable lasers at university, where I also wrote research papers on negative dynamic resistance, Schottky diodes, and various noise sources in cryogenically-cooled amplifiers. All of this contributed to me earning a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering degree.
... You just took several factory produced parts, each worth hundreds man-years if you had to produce it from scratch, and combined them together.
That's how it's usually done, yes. Try it sometime.
XenoMind wrote:
On the other hand, you only need a group of random people to conduct an experiment in psychology.
A group of random people that took billions of years of evolution to produce. The sad thing about small, random samples is that your margin of error is practically indistinguishable from random noise.
XenoMind wrote:
My claim to fame: I know quite a few things about rational thinking and logic...
Oh? Please demonstrate.



karathraceandherspecialdestiny
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 22 Jan 2017
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,857

05 Feb 2019, 10:17 pm

XenoMind wrote:
karathraceandherspecialdestiny wrote:
You shouldn't project your masturbatory activities onto others like that, it's unsightly. I don't have anything to jerk in a circle or otherwise, so I'll have to say no to your gross inappropriate question.

But I don't. I just see what you two are doing here.
By the way, let me help you learn some new things. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/circle-jerk


I know what it means, I just think it's a gross and inappropriate thing to say to someone. I guess you were embarrassed for abandoning an argument you lost and were striking out at me for noticing, but that doesn't make what you said appropriate or not disgusting. You shouldn't lash out emotionally when you lose an argument, it's bad form. I struggle with this sometimes myself so I understand but I still don't condone what you said to me.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

06 Feb 2019, 4:33 am

XenoMind wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
XenoMind wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
Oh, I didn't exactly say it was "impossible."

That's what you wrote, literally:

Quote:
Quote:
All these things can be analyzed, and are analyzed. :wink:

Not through the lens of "hard" science.


I "literally" didn't use the word "impossible."


Well, great. So you're ready to admit that all those subjects can be successfully studied through the lens of "hard" science?


Nope.

Fnord already explained to you that science runs the spectrum of "soft" to "hard" and that most social/cultural issues fall strictly on the "soft" end. If that explanation didn't take, I highly doubt a second explanation will ether.

Furthermore, as a person who has suffered gender issues all their life, I look forward to the day "hard science" can "prove" what hairstyles, clothing, mannerisms, and interests are "objectively" "male" and "female" so that I can finally embrace an identity. /sarcasm


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)