Page 12 of 31 [ 485 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 31  Next

leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

09 May 2011, 1:20 pm

WilliamWDelaney wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
The "change/s of outlook" I experienced was/were always related to the matter of hope, and at the very end of my drinking (as that end ultimately proved to be), the very best "outlook" I still had only amounted to something like "still hoping there might yet be some hope available somewhere" (in the face of having come to have no hope at all) ...

Whereas my reason for changing course was similar to yours, I have simply used a different approach to resolution.

I understand, and I say the same as you (and as already well-evidenced in this thread) ...

WilliamWDelaney wrote:
... I have been forced to realize that the comprehension I have of the subject is not something that I can easily communicate to others. I am actually largely a lot better off simply being friendly and agreeable with people over the topic. I find that I get along with people a lot better that way.


And for me, I learned about that from here:

"If he thinks he can do the job in some other way, or prefers some other spiritual approach, encourage him to follow his own conscience. We have no monopoly on God; we merely have an approach that worked with us. But point out that we alcoholics have much in common and that you would like, in any case, to be friendly. Let it go at that."
(page 95)

But for some reason, some of the others folks here just cannot seem to do the same, eh?! :wink:


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


aspi-rant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,448
Location: denmark

09 May 2011, 1:27 pm

Vexcalibur wrote:
1. The world has tons of evil.
2. God is all powerful
3. God is good.

All three of those propositions cannot be true. We know the first to be true. So (God is not omnipotent) or (God is not good). You pick.



Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?

Epicurus (c. 341 - c. 270 BC)



Bethie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster

09 May 2011, 1:29 pm

leejosepho wrote:
Show me even but even just one lie I have ever posted here on WP!

Every single time in this PPR forum where you invoke your sob story of addiction recovery as "evidence" of a god,
yet eventually admitted here openly you believed in god for a long time before and during your alcoholism.

Every single time you've said god controls your life yet does not intervene in it.

Every single time you say GOD saved you, yet strangely cite not the holy book of the religion you had DURING your alcoholism,
but the ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS handbook.

Every single time you say your PRE-EXISTING belief in a god was not necessary for you to finally "trust" in said god,
yet concede you were a theist long beforehand.

Every single time you say god somehow saved you, but not by intervening, and not through your faith, either, since you had to GIVE THAT UP to get better.

But if you wish/must, just keep right on trying to pretend you haven't been spewing non-sensical bullsh*ttery left and right and threatening me when I call a spade a "troll".


_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.


Last edited by Bethie on 09 May 2011, 1:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

aspi-rant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Sep 2008
Age: 62
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,448
Location: denmark

09 May 2011, 1:31 pm

Fnord wrote:
aspi-rant wrote:
... "god is omnipotent" is a completely false statement. what else in religions are false statements then? please make me a list.... a complete list.

We're going to be here a very, very long time while the list is being compiled.


yep. :lol:



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

09 May 2011, 1:58 pm

psychohist wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
Would you truly prefer not having free will?

Ironically, your story sounds to me a lot like your benefits came from giving up your free will to your god, when you talk about letting him take control of your life.

You are very close there, and I might only elaborate just a bit ...

It was of my own "free will" that I "abandoned my will" for His "new management to take over", so to speak, and in the sense of "having it repaired" just as we all do when we drop something off at the repair shop. But then a little farther on down to road, my "will" was then returned to me in "good working order" just like we again then visit the shop and retrieve our repaired stuff. Overall, then, my will always was and still is "mine" to do with as I please.

psychohist wrote:
Since you earlier in the thread talked about your experience as "evidence" for your god, I'll just point out that there's no real evidence for any god in it.

I understand.

psychohist wrote:
To this atheist, it looks like you gave up the idea that you just gave up your sense of control, and that permitted you to conform to an Alcoholics Anonymous formula for kicking alcohol addiction.

I could fine-tune that a bit, but that is close enough.

psychohist wrote:
That that formula credits a god doesn't prove one exists.

Understood.

psychohist wrote:
It does, however, provide evidence that a belief in God can be useful. Some beliefs may be useful even if they are false.

I always encourage people to act upon virtually anything at all they might happen to believe .... and to then let the results give indication of any actual value!


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

09 May 2011, 2:03 pm

Bethie wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
Bethie wrote:
... or genuinely don't consider whether religious belief precedes reasons to have it ...

To have what?

Religious belief.

So then, you are asking about whether I "consider whether religious belief precedes reasons to have religious belief"?


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

09 May 2011, 2:13 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
... for you to know that requires that you have a mental capacity ...

You don't have a philosophical analysis, and you don't seem to know what it means.

intellectual competence just isnt' your thing.

I most certainly do know what "philosophical analysis" means, but I neither need nor even want one ... and you can please cut the BS about me.

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Quote:
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa! Where did you ever get the idea of chronic alcoholism being "a psychological disease"?! ...

.... the fact that it is a psychological disease. If you're disputing self-evident facts with me ...

Ah, you make me laugh! I have lived alcoholism, and "psychological disease" it is not! However, I do clearly understand why you could not possible see it any other way.

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Healing a body-part is some pretty solid transformation.

Please forgive me for not being more clear by placing the word "spiritual" just ahead of "transformation".


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

09 May 2011, 2:15 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
1. The world has tons of evil.
2. God is all powerful
3. God is good.

All three of those propositions cannot be true ...

Not true! A sovereign God (a monarch) can either do or not do as He wishes.

But he can't be considered moral if ...

Says who?


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

09 May 2011, 2:17 pm

Bethie wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
Bethie wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
1. The world has tons of evil.
2. God is all powerful
3. God is good.

All three of those propositions cannot be true ...

Not true! A sovereign God (a monarch) can either do or not do as He wishes.

So he's BOTH good AND powerful enough to stop evil....and chooses not to.

Hence making him NOT good after all.

Would you truly prefer not having free will?


The implication being that we DO?

Well, even I could argue that even you are here doing whatever you do simply because you have no control over anything and therefore simply must!


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


kladky
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 27 Dec 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 56
Location: Midwest U.S.

09 May 2011, 2:30 pm

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
No I don't make this error. Unless you are now promoted dualistic polytheism, Satan's existence isn't relevant. It doesn't matter if there are THOUSANDS of spirits going about, or MILLIONS, if only one of them is all-powerful and all-knowing, then this one would still have the ability to in practice actualize anything. You haven't actually contested a premise as well, in an argument that claims to be deductive, so.... you missed the point.

Secondly, I've seen Job. No real justification given. Job was tortured on a bet, which.... makes no sense unless this loving God of yours is to be considered to play games with our lives for petty reasons. In fact, not even God gives a good reason for the sufferings Job underwent, instead just saying "I'm so MIGHTY so STFU"... which... doesn't really show us that God is just, loving, or any other quality normally attributed to God.

Whether you understand what happened to Job or not, the point is God allows Satan and others free will. If he stopped evil ones from doing what they will do, they would not have free will. And any evil they do can certainly be reversed by God in his own good time.

Awesomelyglorious wrote:

Right, but we ought to follow the guideline, so the point that it is only a guideline is silly. The best possibility is always the epistemic question, otherwise the mere possibility of an undead Elvis stalking the earth would be a credible approach.

Occam's Razor only says that the simplest explanation should be chosen if all other things are equal. It can be wrong. Sometimes the simple explanation is not the truth.

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
It disproves nearly every bit of Christian theology for the past 2000 years though. Once again, if God is guiding this group of people to know and understand him, why the hell is he letting them get this wrong for so long? That makes no sense, as he could *easily* prevent this. Why doesn't he if he truly wants his people to know him, and love him how he is, and not y'know, worship a false idol or something?

And.... that is meaningful? Why the crucifix? Why is it so important? Why did Christian theology adopt that as a symbol if all he needed to do was be Adam? Even further, why is that even necessary? Why did God actually need to do this. Don't give me a set of scriptures, give me a logical reason, preferably of a deductive sort.

I mean, let's just face it: I said "Christ's death on the cross makes no ethical sense. ", and no answer is really given, but the importance and centrality of this in the life of Jesus Christ is a very very early doctrine, and one where ethical sense is needed, particularly if this is a fulfillment of some substantive standard, which Paul and others represent it as being.


The crucifixion was not necessary. I also don't believe in venerating the cross. Tell you what: let me do some research when I have the time and get back to you. This is not a copout, it's just the way it is. You can take it as you wish.
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
FAIL!! !! !! !

There's no reason to shout.
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
My comment had NOTHING to do with the possible existence of false Christians, it had everything to do with our inability to make a distinction between the two categories, and to really show that there is divine action here, when scripture suggests the existence of divine actions.

In fact, I literally summed up what I said as "The transformation of the church by the Holy Spirit seems not to have occurred. ", false Christians are compatible, but what I say is going on, isn't, and the extensive nature of the problem isn't so easily resolved by "false Christians" as nobody seems to know who the real ones are.


Do you believe there are "real Christians?" I do. They are few and far between, but they exist. Here is how you can find them:
-They base their teachings on the Bible, not philosophy or dogma.
-They worship the true God and make His name known.
-They have genuine, unselfish love for one another, despite race, gender or nationality.
-They accept Jesus as God's means of salvation.
-They are no part of the world, being disinterested in politics.
-They preach God's Kingdom as the only hope for humankind.

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Except that it is not. The problem is that NT theology does talk about fires, torments, and so on and so forth in a manner that does not suggest the kind of result of Ezekiel. Even further, the assumption that all scriptures make the same claims is not proven, you're assuming it, even though scripture has clear contradictions, even to the point where many of the supposed "fulfillments of prophecy" in the NT aren't real. (Mary didn't have to be a virgin as a simple one. But also Matthew's use of Hosea 11:1 as prophecy is a poor reading of the scripture)

Jesus spoke of Gehenna, which was the name of the garbage pit outside of Jerusalem. This was where garbage went, not to burn forever, but to be destroyed. He also spoke of Hades, the Greek equivalent of Sheol, the common grave of man. Jesus himself is said to have gone there when he died and Job asked to die so that he could go there. Obviously not a place of torture. Hell, as we know it, is an invention of the Middle Ages, meant to keep the peasantry in line. Neither Jesus nor God ever threatened anyone with eternal torment.

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Warnings?? The passage literally proclaims all the horrible things God will do to these people. Just read:

If you are going to say that these are only warnings of what will happen, not claims of a God's will to harm these people, either you are insane, incapable of reading, or an outright liar, and you can take your pick as any of them show that you are enough of a disgusting creature to no longer be worth my time as ANY HUMAN BEING can see that God intended to horrifyingly hurt all of these people. This isn't even some special translation that I am using, but it's just the ESV, and other translations say the same thing, whether they are the KJV or JPS.


Actually there is a fourth option. I saw Deuteronomy 28 and assumed it was the first part of the chapter which says they will be cursed and doesn't attribute the cursing to God specifically. I was, in fact, being lazy that day, I suppose. :cry: I had some things on my mind and probably shouldn't have tried to respond to you until I was ready. I guess you never have days like that. BTW, of the three you mention only an outright liar would be a "disgusting creature" to me. I pity the insane and the illiterate. If you do not, I pity you as well.

You missed something very important. This chapter is an assertion of what will happen if the Israelites do one way or the other. Deuteronomy 28:1-14 says all the good things God will do for them if they obey him. The rest of the chapter is all the bad things he will do/will simply happen if they disobey him. Is that unreasonable? God gives us free will, but he still wants us to make the right choices.

Let me put it this way. If God does exist, and if he truly has a time appointed when he will end this world as we know it, and if he is in fact the Judeo-Christian God, then he has a right, nay an obligation to fill the world with people who love him, love each other, and will obey his righteous standards. At that time, he will have provided absolute proof of his existence, yet some will still want to do what they want to do.
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Did an all-powerful God need genocide to end certain practices? The mere suggestion as if genocide, an option that modern civilizations all reject and shun as outside the realms of what is reasonable or even acceptable, is the best option for a God with powers and wisdom beyond that which is available to any nation is just insane. Are you saying that God could not have revealed himself, confronted their minds to change this? Are you saying that God could not have only had some people killed and the rest inducted into Israeli society? I mean, you can present mere possibilities all day, but is this *reasonable* given everything I know about the world to think is sensible?

So you're ok with God killing some of them? Well, in fact, there were certains ones of the Canaanites who were allowed to exist within Israel. Keep in mind, the Canaanites had heard about what happened in Egypt, as Rahab told the Israelite spies. They apparently chose to ignore/disbelieve it.

Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Even further, does this answer the hardening of Pharaoh's heart? The text clearly states at one of the points that God hardened Pharaoh's heart so that he might torment the Egyptian people further to show his glory. Does this answer the flood in Genesis? God clearly committed what is by some metrics the largest genocide ever if he did this, and if genocide is something so savage and immoral that we Western nations cannot accept it, how can we say that God is below that standard of competence and morality? It makes no sense, because if we petty earthlings can do without, why not an all-powerful, all-knowing God?

Again, let me get back to you.
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
Also, I still had a g and h. You reaffirmed Adam, and Adam is really really not compatible as the father of mankind given the nature of evolutionary processes involving mankind. H then goes to show that in order for your faith to succeed, you have to either show that I am suppressing knowledge, or that your apologetics just blow my mojo out of the water, and either way is kind of insane. After all, nothing you've done is anything but an effort to blunt my arguments, and even then the effort to blunt isn't that strong.


You believe that Adam was not real. Therefore, my argument means nothing to you without my proving that evolution is false. You don't seem prepared to even entertain that thought.

I would never accuse you of suppressing knowledge. You seem very intelligent and well-read. Had you and I met on the street, I imagine we would have had a far more genial discussion. I'm growing tired of roundabout discussions which don't lead anywhere. We can go back and forth for years and not prove anything to each other. You have some valid arguments and concerns. I would like a non-rigid open-minded discussion which doesn't include shouting or calling me disgusting.



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

09 May 2011, 2:34 pm

Bethie wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
Show me even but even just one lie I have ever posted here on WP!

Every single time in this PPR forum where you invoke your sob story of ...

You just came real close to being told to go f**k yourself, but I already know the mods will not tolerate that. So, let us try that again ...

Bethie wrote:
Every single time in this PPR forum where you [mention your] addiction recovery as "evidence" of a god ...

I also make it clear I do not expect that to prove anything to anyone other than me.

Bethie wrote:
... yet eventually admitted here openly you believed in god for a long time before and during your alcoholism.

Yes, and then why do you seem to keep missing the part where I say that "believed in" was of absolutely no good use to me?!

Bethie wrote:
Every single time you've said god controls your life yet does not intervene in it.

Whew ...

Quote:
An intervention is an orchestrated attempt by one, or often many, people (usually family and friends) to get someone to seek professional help with an addiction or some kind of traumatic event or crisis, or other serious problem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interventi ... nseling%29

No one at all has ever done anything like that in my life! And in fact, my mother once even begged the court to not in any way intervene even while I was standing in front of a judge as an addict with a possession charge that easily could have sent me back to finish a felony sentence!

What part of "God does not intervene" do you not understand?!

Bethie wrote:
Every single time you say GOD saved you, yet strangely cite not the holy book of the religion you had DURING your alcoholism,
but the ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS handbook.

You bet ... and how the 'ell would that constitute some kind of lying?! During all of my religious days, I could never make any sense of Scripture ... and so now it sits underneath my other book.

Bethie wrote:
Every single time you say your PRE-EXISTING belief in a god was not necessary ...

I have not said that. Rather, I have said it was useless.

Bethie wrote:
But if you wish/must, just keep right on trying to pretend ...

Ah, now maybe I should tell what what to go do ...

... but no, Sallamandrina would be displeased.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


Last edited by leejosepho on 09 May 2011, 2:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

09 May 2011, 2:39 pm

My "put a sock in it" seems to have passed muster?



leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

09 May 2011, 2:48 pm

Philologos wrote:
My "put a sock in it" seems to have passed muster?

That, or maybe it just got missed altogether! :roll:

Personally, I am having a great time here and I know I can outlast absolutely anybody ...

A quarter-century of A.A./AA meetings will do that fer ya.

Nevertheless ... but oh, I must first tell you this:

I actually did go to bed around 1AM earlier this morning, but then Eli did not have to tell me what to do when the call came to come back here ...

... but yes, now I really must go take a shower and get some sleep in preparation for later on!

Peace to all.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


WilliamWDelaney
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

09 May 2011, 3:31 pm

kladky wrote:
Hell, as we know it, is an invention of the Middle Ages, meant to keep the peasantry in line. Neither Jesus nor God ever threatened anyone with eternal torment.
Oh, hohoho! Favorite subject! Many people have no idea how evil and corrupt the Church was during some points in its history.

The Donation of Constantine, a forged document supposedly giving the Church of Rome control over Western Roman Empire. For a long time, the Church of Rome used this as justification for giving themselves not only Earthly but also spiritual authority.

And there was Emperor Justinian I shutting down the schools of philosophy, buying out the Church essentially at swordpoint, and overall being a murdering monster.

Oh, and the Holy Roman Empire was neither "holy" nor "Roman" nor an "empire" at any point in its sad, screwed-up history.

Finally, under the pretense of "converting the Pagans," the Church of Rome virtually exterminated every competing religious sect in Western Europe, though the Druids were arguably one of the more ridiculous sects they did away with (unless, of course, the "mass graves" often attributed to the "human sacrifice" supposedly done by the Druids was really just mass murder by the "Christians" of various time periods. Or perhaps just secularly motivated genocidal behavior by cultures that exercised Druidry?)

But I am very glad that people like yourself are helping to redeem Christianity by dispelling the aspects of it that arose during this period of tyranny.

Tengriism! Study Tengriism! You would find it very exciting as an addition to your other studies!



Last edited by WilliamWDelaney on 09 May 2011, 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

09 May 2011, 3:32 pm

leejosepho wrote:
I most certainly do know what "philosophical analysis" means, but I neither need nor even want one ... and you can please cut the BS about me.

Everybody who speaks on something so abstract certainly needs one. The belief you neither need nor want signifies ignorance.

Quote:
Ah, you make me laugh! I have lived alcoholism, and "psychological disease" it is not! However, I do clearly understand why you could not possible see it any other way.

Ok?? .... You seem to think that a complete pig ignorance is justified by life experience. Somehow I don't see it this way.

Quote:
Please forgive me for not being more clear by placing the word "spiritual" just ahead of "transformation".

So, alcoholism, the body's chemical dependence upon a drug, is more spiritual than a part of the body malfunctioning to reproduce too rapidly? The difference isn't clear. (Note: You might then still say "I *LIVED* this" but........ a lot of people have experience but still don't know what the hell they are talking about. You seem to be very clearly in this category.



Philologos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Age: 81
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,987

09 May 2011, 4:04 pm

You - [read "I"] can't read every word, especiall with multiply layered quotes, but sdometimes a line catches your eye.

this from a post psychohist > leejosepho a step back:

"your story sounds to me a lot like your benefits came from giving up your free will to your god, when you talk about letting him take control of your life"

We see here first, the FAR too common misapprehension. Will is will. Wish. Desire. Decision. Choice."

Will is NOT action, control, It is probably partly that there is so much "freedom of choice" talk that people start thinking it means being in charge.

God designs a world such that leejosepho, Hlilologos, psychohist, usw. have free will. I may choose to drive - though my feet barely reach the pedals, I do not know the route, I only have a learner's permit, and the traffic pattern is sending me into overload. Or I may exercise my free will and choose to let God drive.

WILL IS NOT CONTROL. Handing over control is an act of free will.

Learn English or tell me another lAZnguage that might get through, folks.