Page 12 of 22 [ 350 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 22  Next


What is the primary reason for disapproval of homosexuality?
Religion 36%  36%  [ 40 ]
Fear that homosexuals will be attracted to YOU 3%  3%  [ 3 ]
Fear of disintegrating gender roles 10%  10%  [ 11 ]
Male fear of gay anal rape 5%  5%  [ 5 ]
Homosexual intercourse cannot produce children 4%  4%  [ 4 ]
It just icks people out 18%  18%  [ 20 ]
It defies social norms 10%  10%  [ 11 ]
Other (please explain below) 15%  15%  [ 16 ]
Total votes : 110

snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

31 Dec 2011, 5:03 pm

If gay marriage is made legal, will the streets be filled with queers running around naked, shoving their junk in the faces of children?



puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

31 Dec 2011, 5:05 pm

snapcap wrote:
If gay marriage is made legal, will the streets be filled with queers running around naked, shoving their junk in the faces of children?


One can only hope.






EDIT: I'm joking.


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

31 Dec 2011, 5:22 pm

puddingmouse wrote:
snapcap wrote:
If gay marriage is made legal, will the streets be filled with queers running around naked, shoving their junk in the faces of children?


One can only hope.






EDIT: I'm joking.


It wasn't a serious question, but I've heard of people that bring that up. I just think, "why does that stop them from doing it now?"



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

31 Dec 2011, 5:49 pm

WilliamWDelaney wrote:
[Moderator redacted]


I think gay people lust after each other because that is the way their lust works.

I am happy with my heterosexual lusts. What gays do to or with each other is not my concern. As long as their habits are not forced upon me, I have no problem. Basically I don't think about it much. It is not my problem.

When I deal with strangers I do not consider their private sexual behavior because it has nothing to do with the interactions that I am concerned with. Basically, I really don't care. That is why gay marriage does not bother me. I am not going to marry a gay person and no gay person is going to marry me.

What am I to gay folk and what are they to me? Nothing and nothing.

ruveyn



WilliamWDelaney
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

31 Dec 2011, 5:52 pm

snapcap wrote:
puddingmouse wrote:
snapcap wrote:
If gay marriage is made legal, will the streets be filled with queers running around naked, shoving their junk in the faces of children?


One can only hope.






EDIT: I'm joking.


It wasn't a serious question, but I've heard of people that bring that up. I just think, "why does that stop them from doing it now?"
I know it, man. And let me reiterate an old point, marriage has a stabilizing effect on the queers. If anything, having the option and implicit obligation to get married and settle down causes them to behave more normally.



WilliamWDelaney
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

31 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm

ruveyn wrote:
WilliamWDelaney wrote:
[Moderator redacted]


I think gay people lust after each other because that is the way their lust works.
So how do you deal with weirdo cases like me? I "lust" after female bodies, and the purely carnal side of my sexuality is mostly heterosexual. That ends entirely as soon as we strike up a conversation: with women, I immediately start talking to them like I would talk to a buddy. Sure, I can open up to them and be honest with them, but I feel too comfortable with them for there to be any passion. With men, we end up talking about our innermost feelings, discussing our deepest, darkest secrets, etc., and I'm caught up in an intimate relationship before I'm really given any say in it. It's not strictly speaking a voluntary sort of thing. There is a lot to being a gay guy besides just lust.

Quote:
It is not my problem.
The main problem, like I said, is with clueless straight people who have grown up with no concept whatsoever of gay people, except for some perverted fringe weirdos that everyone makes fun of. My boyfriend grew up in the 50s (he's a grandfather too, by the way, a bi guy), and I know very well just how messed-up things were in the 1950s.

Ruveyn, it's not your fault, but you simply grew up in an environment in which you were not given a very good context for understanding gay people. I didn't mean to try to psychoanalyze you PERSONALLY, but I know for a fact that it makes a HUGE difference if young people are given a basic concept, early on in their lives, of what a gay person is. As annoying and sometimes degrading as caricatures like the ones on Modern Family and such are, it's providing necessary exposure. They are serving as somewhat better role-models for gay people than the phonies off of "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy," and they are illuminating for straight people the fact that gay guys go through most of the same crap in their love lives as straight people.

And even if I have you individually wrong, I know that people from your generation have a great big empty space in their heads, a great big question-mark, concerning gay people. The context for them is just not there, except as a few vague caricatures and a somewhat scary sense that you might disappear one dark night if someone thought you were one.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

31 Dec 2011, 6:54 pm

ruveyn wrote:
pandabear wrote:

As long as you are getting an outstanding blow job, wouldn't you prefer a toothless old man who was good with his tongue, versus a squeemish 18-year-old Victoria's Secret model who bites?


The thought of a male getting near my genitals in anything other than a medical examination shivers my timbers. The mere thought screams Abomination! at the top of its lungs.

ruveyn


Aw, cum on, Ruveyn. It can't be that bad.

Image

[Moderator redacted text]



LiendaBalla
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,736

31 Dec 2011, 7:09 pm

When I think about the core of it, it always goes to something like number three right there. I certainly don't see it as gender nuetral, but more pro-gender vrs. gender. After all, 'guys don't act like girls in bed! It's disgusting!" :roll: "All women live to serve their male spouse!" Ect.



blauSamstag
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,026

31 Dec 2011, 7:22 pm

ruveyn wrote:
pandabear wrote:

As long as you are getting an outstanding blow job, wouldn't you prefer a toothless old man who was good with his tongue, versus a squeemish 18-year-old Victoria's Secret model who bites?


The thought of a male getting near my genitals in anything other than a medical examination shivers my timbers. The mere thought screams Abomination! at the top of its lungs.

ruveyn


Why? Are you afraid that you might like it or something?

All the gay men i know are looking for (or in committed relationships with) willing, enthusiastic, adult partners. Not a single one of them has ever flirted with me.

There are cultures that are so vehemently anti-gay that a man will grab your junk just to make sure you don't like it.

I would find that to be an unpleasant intrusion of personal space, but the way you express your objection makes it sound like there is more to it for you.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

31 Dec 2011, 9:08 pm

blauSamstag wrote:

Why? Are you afraid that you might like it or something?

.


I have no desire to experience terminal disgust. Some people like abominations. I do not.

Having sex with a man is equivalent (for me) to sitting down and eating a plateful of hot steaming sh*t.

ruveyn



WilliamWDelaney
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

31 Dec 2011, 9:09 pm

Actually, I think that in the case of people like Ruveyn, they are genuinely coming from deeply institutionalized homophobia. With people from a certain generation, it's so deeply ingrained on their psyche that it's kind of unfair to judge them for it too harshly. I actually have a great-uncle, now gone round the bend sadly, who once told me, in his own words, "I am a racist. I can't help that I am a racist, but it is just the culture that I was born into. I disagree with racism, but it's not something you just decide to have." I think the same is going to be true for a long time for things like homophobia.



Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 69,549
Location: Over there

31 Dec 2011, 9:17 pm

Yes. To a certain degree my father was much the same - for both things.
He was born in 1916 and died in 2010 without ever knowing about my sexuality. This troubled me greatly on one level, but on another I knew it would trouble him even more.


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


blauSamstag
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,026

31 Dec 2011, 10:24 pm

WilliamWDelaney wrote:
Actually, I think that in the case of people like Ruveyn, they are genuinely coming from deeply institutionalized homophobia. With people from a certain generation, it's so deeply ingrained on their psyche that it's kind of unfair to judge them for it too harshly. I actually have a great-uncle, now gone round the bend sadly, who once told me, in his own words, "I am a racist. I can't help that I am a racist, but it is just the culture that I was born into. I disagree with racism, but it's not something you just decide to have." I think the same is going to be true for a long time for things like homophobia.


It is, however, upsetting when people of that generation are dead set against institutionally training children to be less racist, or less homophobic.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

31 Dec 2011, 11:02 pm

ruveyn wrote:
blauSamstag wrote:

Why? Are you afraid that you might like it or something?

.


I have no desire to experience terminal disgust. Some people like abominations. I do not.

Having sex with a man is equivalent (for me) to sitting down and eating a plateful of hot steaming sh*t.

ruveyn


Suppose you were locked away in a prison, with nothing but male companionship? Or, in a nuclear submarine, underwater with nothing but men, for months at a time?



blauSamstag
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,026

31 Dec 2011, 11:14 pm

pandabear wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
blauSamstag wrote:

Why? Are you afraid that you might like it or something?

.


I have no desire to experience terminal disgust. Some people like abominations. I do not.

Having sex with a man is equivalent (for me) to sitting down and eating a plateful of hot steaming sh*t.

ruveyn


Suppose you were locked away in a prison, with nothing but male companionship? Or, in a nuclear submarine, underwater with nothing but men, for months at a time?


When in rome?



Telekon
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 411

01 Jan 2012, 6:52 am

pandabear wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
blauSamstag wrote:

Why? Are you afraid that you might like it or something?

.


I have no desire to experience terminal disgust. Some people like abominations. I do not.

Having sex with a man is equivalent (for me) to sitting down and eating a plateful of hot steaming sh*t.

ruveyn


Suppose you were locked away in a prison, with nothing but male companionship? Or, in a nuclear submarine, underwater with nothing but men, for months at a time?


He'd probably jerk off, if he became aroused at all (he's 75). Same-sex attraction can't be comditioned. Do you believe that gays can be turned straight?