Is genocide justified when it comes to psychopaths?

Page 12 of 13 [ 199 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next


Should psychopaths be eliminated?
No, they are people too 83%  83%  [ 24 ]
Yes, they are dangerous and worthless 17%  17%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 29

eigerpere
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

29 Feb 2012, 4:35 am

Subotai wrote:
Is genocide justified against people who victimize animals either directly or through accessory?
How about those who willingly accept the benefits of living in a society that victimizes people of less influential nations?


You'd better start a different thread. This is off topic.



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

29 Feb 2012, 4:35 am

Systematic extermination of sentient life is never justified. The whole concept is an abomination and highly Orwellian to me. It would be a high strung society where people have to maintain the illusion of upbeat mental health to avoid sociopath or psychopath status and the socioeconomic or even lethal consequences that go with either. It is possible political factions could manipulate this system in their favor by declaring opposition to their doctrine inhumane and thus only sociopaths or psychopaths would oppose them. The writing is on the wall


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


NarcissusSavage
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 675

29 Feb 2012, 4:39 am

NarcissusSavage wrote:
eigerpere wrote:
You're the one doing the attacking, sh*t for brains.
lol?

o_O

eigerpere wrote:
You're an as*hole.


Ah..

>.>
<.<
>.<

Wait what?

Genocide. It's morally reprehensible. Deal with it.

If you are in favor of genocide, you are morally bankrupt. Deal with it.


_________________
I am Ignostic.
Go ahead and define god, with universal acceptance of said definition.
I'll wait.


eigerpere
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

29 Feb 2012, 4:44 am

NarcissusSavage wrote:
NarcissusSavage wrote:
eigerpere wrote:
You're the one doing the attacking, sh*t for brains.
lol?

o_O

eigerpere wrote:
You're an as*hole.


Ah..

>.>
<.<
>.<

Wait what?

Genocide. It's morally reprehensible. Deal with it.

If you are in favor of genocide, you are morally bankrupt. Deal with it.


Just grow up. You're truly pathetic. Enjoy!



eigerpere
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

29 Feb 2012, 4:50 am

I'm definitely for genocide of the psycho. Have met one psychopath too many.



eigerpere
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

29 Feb 2012, 4:52 am

Manipulating as*holes are fair game too and should be eliminated.



Subotai
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,036
Location: 日本

29 Feb 2012, 4:53 am

eigerpere wrote:
Subotai wrote:
Is genocide justified against people who victimize animals either directly or through accessory?
How about those who willingly accept the benefits of living in a society that victimizes people of less influential nations?


You'd better start a different thread. This is off topic.


Not at all.
If you can't see the relevance then you probably shouldn't reply.



eigerpere
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

29 Feb 2012, 4:54 am

Subotai wrote:
eigerpere wrote:
Subotai wrote:
Is genocide justified against people who victimize animals either directly or through accessory?
How about those who willingly accept the benefits of living in a society that victimizes people of less influential nations?


You'd better start a different thread. This is off topic.


Not at all.
If you can't see the relevance then you probably shouldn't reply.


I see the relevance but it doesn't matter to me.



Subotai
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,036
Location: 日本

29 Feb 2012, 4:56 am

eigerpere wrote:
Subotai wrote:
eigerpere wrote:
Subotai wrote:
Is genocide justified against people who victimize animals either directly or through accessory?
How about those who willingly accept the benefits of living in a society that victimizes people of less influential nations?


You'd better start a different thread. This is off topic.


Not at all.
If you can't see the relevance then you probably shouldn't reply.


I see the relevance but it doesn't matter to me.


So then how is it off topic? If anything it expands the topic.
And if it doesn't matter to you then you probably shouldn't reply either.



eigerpere
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

29 Feb 2012, 5:03 am

I just think you're as*holes, just so you know.



eigerpere
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

29 Feb 2012, 5:04 am

And as*holes should be eliminated.



Subotai
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2010
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,036
Location: 日本

29 Feb 2012, 5:07 am

eigerpere wrote:
I just think you're as*holes, just so you know.


Sorry, I might have been a little harsh with you.
I have no intention of getting involved in any personal arguments, I was just posting my thoughts on the matter.



eigerpere
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 371

29 Feb 2012, 5:11 am

Subotai wrote:
eigerpere wrote:
I just think you're as*holes, just so you know.


Sorry, I might have been a little harsh with you.
I have no intention of getting involved in any personal arguments, I was just posting my thoughts on the matter.


No you're not being harsh with me. :roll:



donnie_darko
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,981

29 Feb 2012, 5:16 am

Maybe someone should lock this thread.



NarcissusSavage
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 675

29 Feb 2012, 5:20 am

donnie_darko wrote:
Maybe someone should lock this thread.

I second this motion.


_________________
I am Ignostic.
Go ahead and define god, with universal acceptance of said definition.
I'll wait.


MCalavera
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,442

29 Feb 2012, 5:20 am

Might be the best case ...