Feminism at its best by gorillas!
Well, what about them?
you said this:
but it isn't the lack of sex that directly leads to problems, it may be other things like the sense of entitlement bestowed by culture (or a person's own messed up psychology. who knows?).
Meekly accepting one's lot in life is one solution. But, it won't work for everyone.
Some people might be satisfied with w*king off to pornography. Redoubling one's efforts to find a sex buddy will lead either to success or to redoubled disappointment.
"Sense of entitlement bestowed by culture?" What is that supposed to mean? People are entitled to seek happiness on their own terms. One is in charge of one's own life. If one culture doesn't work, another might. North American culture isn't all that it is cracked up to be. Far from it.
Well, what about them?
you said this:
but it isn't the lack of sex that directly leads to problems, it may be other things like the sense of entitlement bestowed by culture (or a person's own messed up psychology. who knows?).
Meekly accepting one's lot in life is one solution. But, it won't work for everyone.
Some people might be satisfied with w*king off to pornography. Redoubling one's efforts to find a sex buddy will lead either to success or to redoubled disappointment.
"Sense of entitlement bestowed by culture?" What is that supposed to mean? People are entitled to seek happiness on their own terms. One is in charge of one's own life. If one culture doesn't work, another might. North American culture isn't all that it is cracked up to be. Far from it.
no, they are not entitled to seek happiness on their own terms. one person might get off on raping another, for example. that would solve all the problems - they would get sex, after all. but another person would be violated. that is why one person cannot be consider entitled to sex - the entitlement means that another person must give it to them.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105
Certainly people have an entitlement not to be raped. That would take precedence over another person's entitlement to coitus.
Certainly people have an entitlement not to be raped. That would take precedence over another person's entitlement to coitus.
it is the idea of entitlement to sex that led directly to the "rape culture" and women's lack of agency over their own bodies. it is changing, and but there is also a shifting climate in terms of sexual entitlement in general. you can see how it is problematic to make a blanket statement that anyone should be entitled to seek happiness on their own terms, because it just can't work as a universal statement when we are talking about sex with other people.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105
I love sex but only if she's enjoying it and gives me consent and vica versa I tend to be too gental though.
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
It would appear that gorillas, chimpanzees, lions, and some humans have a "rape culture."
Bonobos and dolphins seem to have more of a "free love" culture.
It might be fun if our species were more like bonobos than chimpanzees. We would have big orgies everywhere. Especially at buffet restaurants. We would get excited and have some rounds of coitus before picking up our plates and getting our food.
Another time for big orgies would be while waiting in line at the Black Friday sales, since we're all so excited about all the crap that we are hoping to buy.
Why not?
I guess one could say that it would be detrimental to the culture to accept the trade of sexual acts - that it degrades everyone to accept it. But I would say that it has already become a commodity and the way society is responding now is more harmful.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nr9GgHthGAk[/youtube][youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFbgJvT4PA[/youtube][youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk0MPoo5pK0[/youtube][youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpwZBIyA4cY[/youtube]This lady is spot on!
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
It's not a question of being worng or not, it's irrelevant to natural selection. This have been selected by evolution because the male who are doing it have better chance to transmit their DNA than the male who did not. It's exactly the samething with the female spider who eat their male, it's a behavior made by natural selection. Female spider who eat male are more succesfull in passing their DNA to next generation of spider than those who dont eat them. Notion like good and bad are not part of nature it's human perception. All living organisisms are subjected to this natural process cold as physical laws.
Not quite.
Male chimps grant "sex privileges" to their allies in order to maintain power.
Male chimpanzees rise to "alpha" status by forming alliances with other males, not by exerting brute strength. A single male chimp isn't strong enough to completely prevent other males from mating. He only "hordes" the females when they are at the height of fertility, but even then he is only ever partially successful.
**source: various works by Frans De Waal**
It's only when the genes are bad and paired together that you see these diseases and whatnot crop up that can lead to illness and sometimes, death.
If you have a population without these genes and they are interbreeding, how can it be bad unless something mutates and a condition arises that way.
So you see, it's the genes that are to blame, not the actual breeding practices. Most people do not like the idea of interbreeding, and are disgusted by it. This is the real reason why it's not good.
genetic diversity is good where the environment is changing or when a species is moving into a new habitat. Since most habitats do change over time, genetic diversity is positively associated with long-term survival of a species.
In very rare, stable environments, species may even start to self-fertilize or clone themselves when they hit upon a successful phenotype; at that point, gamete mixing becomes a liability rather than an advantage.
It's only when the genes are bad and paired together that you see these diseases and whatnot crop up that can lead to illness and sometimes, death.
If you have a population without these genes and they are interbreeding, how can it be bad unless something mutates and a condition arises that way.
So you see, it's the genes that are to blame, not the actual breeding practices. Most people do not like the idea of interbreeding, and are disgusted by it. This is the real reason why it's not good.
genetic diversity is good where the environment is changing or when a species is moving into a new habitat. Since most habitats do change over time, genetic diversity is positively associated with long-term survival of a species.
In very rare, stable environments, species may even start to self-fertilize or clone themselves when they hit upon a successful phenotype; at that point, gamete mixing becomes a liability rather than an advantage.
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
Asexuality as opposed to abstinence? Just a play on words.
i didn't mention asexuality either. i mentioned people who simply didn't have sex, not by any conscious choice like abstinence, or any sexual orientation like asexuality. they just didn't get any. and they were fine.
Entitled or not, that is still a sh***y situation to be in. Not because of the lack of sex but because of the loneliness, since it also implies that they could not find a romantic partner.
Asexuality as opposed to abstinence? Just a play on words.
i didn't mention asexuality either. i mentioned people who simply didn't have sex, not by any conscious choice like abstinence, or any sexual orientation like asexuality. they just didn't get any. and they were fine.
Entitled or not, that is still a sh***y situation to be in. Not because of the lack of sex but because of the loneliness, since it also implies that they could not find a romantic partner.
what makes you think that they want one? maybe they do, and maybe they don't. maybe they already have one. there are many couples that go years or decades without having sex, for various reasons. sometimes they are fine with that. it helps to think outside the model of what you want right now, and instead imagine the real spectrum of human existence at at age 70, for example.
_________________
on a break, so if you need assistance please contact another moderator from this list:
viewtopic.php?t=391105