Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,724
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
19 Feb 2015, 9:26 pm
sly279 wrote:
Raptor wrote:
sly279 wrote:
Raptor wrote:
No, I usually state that I'm in favor of a social safety net but not a hammock or words to that effect. It's only the ones lounging on the social safety net that get all butthurt out of a deep sense of guilt and shame......
please define the difference?
The actual needy deserve assistance and the slackers don't.
Psssp.....
The slackers are easy to identify by their whining whenever I use the word "hammock".
define slacker?
define needs assistance?
so if a guy who lost all his limbs and can't work whines when you say hammock hes a slacker. perhaps even though he can't work he still feels guilty for not working and when you talk about it it makes him feel bad that he can't. but guess he's a slacker. or perhaps all the "slackers" should just be disappeared by the government no?
some would say anyone who cant work should be killed, others might say well if they can't move from the neck down then they can get aid, but anyone else is a slacker. luckily the government has a more realistic way of deciding.
Wise words indeed.
19 Feb 2015, 9:31 pm
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,724
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
19 Feb 2015, 11:00 pm
Raptor wrote:
/\ you're both in for it when I get home tomorrow morning.
Foolish mortal, you've only warned us to prepare for you!
20 Feb 2015, 1:07 am
20 Feb 2015, 1:09 am
20 Feb 2015, 2:00 am
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,724
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
20 Feb 2015, 2:41 am
20 Feb 2015, 4:59 am
20 Feb 2015, 6:06 am
20 Feb 2015, 6:07 am
20 Feb 2015, 6:17 am
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,724
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
20 Feb 2015, 10:58 am
20 Feb 2015, 1:48 pm
Dox47 wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Well, if Raptor can have original thoughts similar to others, so can I. Or does that rule only apply to conservatives and libertarians?
You'd have to have an original thought for equality to apply, and so far you haven't. Raptor has evolved significantly over the years on a number of issues, from gay rights to drug policy and many others, while you continue to parrot the same party line you've been squawking since you showed up here, then have the gall to accuse others of being brainwashed or otherwise otherwise speaking in bad faith.
Also, I'd say a good 40% or so of your post count is literally quotes of other people and the words 'what X said', and you can't get much less original than that.
Kraichgauer wrote:
As for me allegedly having never thought outside the liberal political box - those are my beliefs and values. I think it's more a matter of you and Dox disapproving of those beliefs and values.
I disapprove of a lot of values and beliefs held by many of the people here, but I criticize you specifically for reasons having nothing to do with those, which are that you're dishonest, you're a hypocrite, you constantly slander people who you know nothing about, and you condescend to people who are smarter and better informed than you are. I have no problem with honest disagreement, as numerous other posters here can attest to, I have a rather serious problem with partisan idiocy and hypocrisy, your stock in trade.
OH MY GOD.. THAT is perhaps the best example of projection i've ever seen...
Your guns must be getting heavy friend..
That's a stumble.. and an unusual one for you.....
My gun may be smaller but my GUNS ARE BIGGER..
20 Feb 2015, 2:24 pm
20 Feb 2015, 3:24 pm
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor-
To answer both your posts:
Know your enemy.
And...
Not at all. I have no problem with people who use firearms for recreation, or even for those who see gun rights as politically important. But I certainly do have a problem with those people who believe gun rights are without limit, and who believe their gun rights are more important than the grief of those who have suffered loss because of gun violence (the way gun fetishists disregarded the grief of parents who had lost children at Sandy Hook). The same people are the kind who convince themselves of the most insane, baseless conspiracy theories revolving around being martyred for their gun rights (again, Sandy Hook, when gun fetishists claimed the shooting was only a false flag government operation to take their precious guns away, that no children had been killed, and that the grieving parents were only actors).
To answer both your posts:
Know your enemy.
And...
Not at all. I have no problem with people who use firearms for recreation, or even for those who see gun rights as politically important. But I certainly do have a problem with those people who believe gun rights are without limit, and who believe their gun rights are more important than the grief of those who have suffered loss because of gun violence (the way gun fetishists disregarded the grief of parents who had lost children at Sandy Hook). The same people are the kind who convince themselves of the most insane, baseless conspiracy theories revolving around being martyred for their gun rights (again, Sandy Hook, when gun fetishists claimed the shooting was only a false flag government operation to take their precious guns away, that no children had been killed, and that the grieving parents were only actors).
Yeah right, like antis didn't cease the moment to USE that incident (or any others like it) as leverage for their cause.
A few yahoos waving NRA banners or whatever doesn't represent all gun owners like you wish. That was a time for mourning, not political grandstanding. Don't throw stones when you live in a glass house.
I think I demonstrated in my previous posts that I don't demonize all, or even most, gun owners. Rather, I'm talking about the gun fetishists who have been nutso on the subject.
You've consistently demonstrated youself to be an anti in several threads over the years. Want me to go dig up some samples and post them here?
I have what can be described as a most unusual propensity toward photographic memory of text, millions of words of text.. literally speaking....
There is no record here of the 'K' lying AKA dishonesty; I challenge anyone to bring up text PER BLACK AND WHITE QUOTE that proves otherwise, per my last post up there about PROJECTION.
OPINIONS CAN AND DO VARY, like 'A holes', BOTH EXPRESSED AND UNDERSTOOD BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN LIES OR DISHONESTY, JUST problems with cognitive empathy aka theory of mind, most likely, per scientific evidence on 'THAT' 'HERE'.
BULLIES, WITH AVATARS WITH GUNS OR NOT.
PHYSICAL BULLIES.
INTELLECTUAL BULLIES.
DO NOT SCARE ME, OR MAKE ME SWEAT BULLETS...
haha!
AND that's all for now..
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,724
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
20 Feb 2015, 7:46 pm
aghogday wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Raptor-
To answer both your posts:
Know your enemy.
And...
Not at all. I have no problem with people who use firearms for recreation, or even for those who see gun rights as politically important. But I certainly do have a problem with those people who believe gun rights are without limit, and who believe their gun rights are more important than the grief of those who have suffered loss because of gun violence (the way gun fetishists disregarded the grief of parents who had lost children at Sandy Hook). The same people are the kind who convince themselves of the most insane, baseless conspiracy theories revolving around being martyred for their gun rights (again, Sandy Hook, when gun fetishists claimed the shooting was only a false flag government operation to take their precious guns away, that no children had been killed, and that the grieving parents were only actors).
To answer both your posts:
Know your enemy.
And...
Not at all. I have no problem with people who use firearms for recreation, or even for those who see gun rights as politically important. But I certainly do have a problem with those people who believe gun rights are without limit, and who believe their gun rights are more important than the grief of those who have suffered loss because of gun violence (the way gun fetishists disregarded the grief of parents who had lost children at Sandy Hook). The same people are the kind who convince themselves of the most insane, baseless conspiracy theories revolving around being martyred for their gun rights (again, Sandy Hook, when gun fetishists claimed the shooting was only a false flag government operation to take their precious guns away, that no children had been killed, and that the grieving parents were only actors).
Yeah right, like antis didn't cease the moment to USE that incident (or any others like it) as leverage for their cause.
A few yahoos waving NRA banners or whatever doesn't represent all gun owners like you wish. That was a time for mourning, not political grandstanding. Don't throw stones when you live in a glass house.
I think I demonstrated in my previous posts that I don't demonize all, or even most, gun owners. Rather, I'm talking about the gun fetishists who have been nutso on the subject.
You've consistently demonstrated youself to be an anti in several threads over the years. Want me to go dig up some samples and post them here?
I have what can be described as a most unusual propensity toward photographic memory of text, millions of words of text.. literally speaking....
There is no record here of the 'K' lying AKA dishonesty; I challenge anyone to bring up text PER BLACK AND WHITE QUOTE that proves otherwise, per my last post up there about PROJECTION.
OPINIONS CAN AND DO VARY, like 'A holes', BOTH EXPRESSED AND UNDERSTOOD BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN LIES OR DISHONESTY, JUST problems with cognitive empathy aka theory of mind, most likely, per scientific evidence on 'THAT' 'HERE'.
BULLIES, WITH AVATARS WITH GUNS OR NOT.
PHYSICAL BULLIES.
INTELLECTUAL BULLIES.
DO NOT SCARE ME, OR MAKE ME SWEAT BULLETS...
haha!
AND that's all for now..
Thank you and your photographic memory.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Trump proposes U.S. control of Gaza |
Yesterday, 5:07 am |
| Black Church gains control of Proud Boys trademark |
05 Feb 2025, 5:51 pm |
| Reply with your nerdest thing ever. |
28 Jan 2025, 12:07 pm |
|
I'm pretty sure one thing is not related to my diagnosis
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
31 Jan 2025, 8:58 pm |
