Historical Misconceptions That We Hate
envirozentinel
Forum Moderator
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=74759_1577645873.jpg)
Joined: 16 Sep 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 17,031
Location: Keshron, Super-Zakhyria
Yes Bill, they had a raw deal too. My BF lent me his book Bury my Heart At Wounded Knee a long time back but it's such heavy reading that I've never been able to finish the whole book. Although he's South African like me, we both have an affinity with the Native Americans and their culture.
And TW1ZTY reminded me of how the Cherokees were deprived of their land in Georgia too. The evils of forced removals happened in South Africa too, so we can identify with that. It's never right when someone enforces their will on another group of people just because they have the power.
_________________
Why is a trailer behind a car but ahead of a movie?
my blog:
https://sentinel63.wordpress.com/
So I guess that proves my other point about the fact that they commited war crimes against us. When they starved our Confederate POWs to death it was done on purpose. They had the food to feed all of them they just chose not to. Union POWs in the South were starved to death because the food supplies in the south were cut off by the Union Army in an attempt to starve us into surrendering along with the fact that our crops were destroyed.
Some of our men were hanged for that, but nobody in the Union was ever hanged for starving us to death or letting us freeze to death out in the cold winter of the northern states which southerners were not used to being in.
They were war criminals who got away with what they did because they won the war. They can talk s**t about us and use any excuse they want to justify what they did but facts are facts.
As I said, no one defends what happened to Confederate POW's in Union camps.
I find that hard to believe with some people who try to say that the North didn't have food either which is not true like you just said.
It's not the fact thst anybody defends it that bothers me, it's the fact that nobody in the US really acknowledges that it happened when discussing the war but we all learn about what happened to Union soldiers in the Confederate POW camps (as if it was wrong for the Confederates but OK for the Union).
Just like nobody admits that us imprisoning Japanese Americans citizens in internment camps was wrong, and nobody even gives a s**t about what American soldiers did in Abu Ghraib.
But the thing is, I do see and hear outrage about Japanese American interment camps and the abuses at abu Ghraib. With the Civil War, admittedly there isn't nearly as much, as that happened well over a hundred years ago. Here in my part of the country, the Pacific Northwest, we're mostly grieving for what had been done to the ancestors of our Native American neighbors.
People grieve for what happened to the Native Americans here in the south too (AND they still hold anger for what happened to themselves during the Civil War which I feel they have every right to). In fact many people in Georgia claim to have Cherokee ancestry because a lot of white settlers took their women as wives when they first came to this country. The Cherokee Rose also happens to be our state flower.
Even dirty racist slave-owning southerners feel bad about how the Native People of this country were treated by the US government.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
![User avatar](./images/avatars/gallery/Assorted/spiderman20.gif)
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,693
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
So I guess that proves my other point about the fact that they commited war crimes against us. When they starved our Confederate POWs to death it was done on purpose. They had the food to feed all of them they just chose not to. Union POWs in the South were starved to death because the food supplies in the south were cut off by the Union Army in an attempt to starve us into surrendering along with the fact that our crops were destroyed.
Some of our men were hanged for that, but nobody in the Union was ever hanged for starving us to death or letting us freeze to death out in the cold winter of the northern states which southerners were not used to being in.
They were war criminals who got away with what they did because they won the war. They can talk s**t about us and use any excuse they want to justify what they did but facts are facts.
As I said, no one defends what happened to Confederate POW's in Union camps.
I find that hard to believe with some people who try to say that the North didn't have food either which is not true like you just said.
It's not the fact thst anybody defends it that bothers me, it's the fact that nobody in the US really acknowledges that it happened when discussing the war but we all learn about what happened to Union soldiers in the Confederate POW camps (as if it was wrong for the Confederates but OK for the Union).
Just like nobody admits that us imprisoning Japanese Americans citizens in internment camps was wrong, and nobody even gives a s**t about what American soldiers did in Abu Ghraib.
But the thing is, I do see and hear outrage about Japanese American interment camps and the abuses at abu Ghraib. With the Civil War, admittedly there isn't nearly as much, as that happened well over a hundred years ago. Here in my part of the country, the Pacific Northwest, we're mostly grieving for what had been done to the ancestors of our Native American neighbors.
People grieve for what happened to the Native Americans here in the south too (AND they still hold anger for what happened to themselves during the Civil War which I feel they have every right to). In fact many people in Georgia claim to have Cherokee ancestry because a lot of white settlers took their women as wives when they first came to this country. The Cherokee Rose also happens to be our state flower.
Even dirty racist slave-owning southerners feel bad about how the Native People of this country were treated by the US government.
I think I should say that not all northerners think badly of white southerners.
In fact, I count many white southerners among my favorite people, such as Presidents Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, and Bill Clinton, authors William Faulkner, and Robert E. Howard, and Anti-Confederate guerrilla leader Newton Knight, just to mention a few.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
So I guess that proves my other point about the fact that they commited war crimes against us. When they starved our Confederate POWs to death it was done on purpose. They had the food to feed all of them they just chose not to. Union POWs in the South were starved to death because the food supplies in the south were cut off by the Union Army in an attempt to starve us into surrendering along with the fact that our crops were destroyed.
Some of our men were hanged for that, but nobody in the Union was ever hanged for starving us to death or letting us freeze to death out in the cold winter of the northern states which southerners were not used to being in.
They were war criminals who got away with what they did because they won the war. They can talk s**t about us and use any excuse they want to justify what they did but facts are facts.
As I said, no one defends what happened to Confederate POW's in Union camps.
I find that hard to believe with some people who try to say that the North didn't have food either which is not true like you just said.
It's not the fact thst anybody defends it that bothers me, it's the fact that nobody in the US really acknowledges that it happened when discussing the war but we all learn about what happened to Union soldiers in the Confederate POW camps (as if it was wrong for the Confederates but OK for the Union).
Just like nobody admits that us imprisoning Japanese Americans citizens in internment camps was wrong, and nobody even gives a s**t about what American soldiers did in Abu Ghraib.
But the thing is, I do see and hear outrage about Japanese American interment camps and the abuses at abu Ghraib. With the Civil War, admittedly there isn't nearly as much, as that happened well over a hundred years ago. Here in my part of the country, the Pacific Northwest, we're mostly grieving for what had been done to the ancestors of our Native American neighbors.
People grieve for what happened to the Native Americans here in the south too (AND they still hold anger for what happened to themselves during the Civil War which I feel they have every right to). In fact many people in Georgia claim to have Cherokee ancestry because a lot of white settlers took their women as wives when they first came to this country. The Cherokee Rose also happens to be our state flower.
Even dirty racist slave-owning southerners feel bad about how the Native People of this country were treated by the US government.
I think I should say that not all northerners think badly of white southerners.
In fact, I count many white southerners among my favorite people, such as Presidents Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, and Bill Clinton, authors William Faulkner, and Robert E. Howard, and Anti-Confederate guerrilla leader Newton Knight, just to mention a few.
And I don't think badly of all northerners, just the ones who put me down for being from the south like my middle school teacher from New Jersey or my sister's friend who called me a hillbilly because of my accent.
Or Seth MacFarlane. God I hate him!
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
I've been good friends with people from the northern states, but they never put me down because of who I am. Nobody deserves to be looked down on just because of where they are from. If they put me down then I put them down.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
![User avatar](./images/avatars/gallery/Assorted/spiderman20.gif)
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,693
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
So I guess that proves my other point about the fact that they commited war crimes against us. When they starved our Confederate POWs to death it was done on purpose. They had the food to feed all of them they just chose not to. Union POWs in the South were starved to death because the food supplies in the south were cut off by the Union Army in an attempt to starve us into surrendering along with the fact that our crops were destroyed.
Some of our men were hanged for that, but nobody in the Union was ever hanged for starving us to death or letting us freeze to death out in the cold winter of the northern states which southerners were not used to being in.
They were war criminals who got away with what they did because they won the war. They can talk s**t about us and use any excuse they want to justify what they did but facts are facts.
As I said, no one defends what happened to Confederate POW's in Union camps.
I find that hard to believe with some people who try to say that the North didn't have food either which is not true like you just said.
It's not the fact thst anybody defends it that bothers me, it's the fact that nobody in the US really acknowledges that it happened when discussing the war but we all learn about what happened to Union soldiers in the Confederate POW camps (as if it was wrong for the Confederates but OK for the Union).
Just like nobody admits that us imprisoning Japanese Americans citizens in internment camps was wrong, and nobody even gives a s**t about what American soldiers did in Abu Ghraib.
But the thing is, I do see and hear outrage about Japanese American interment camps and the abuses at abu Ghraib. With the Civil War, admittedly there isn't nearly as much, as that happened well over a hundred years ago. Here in my part of the country, the Pacific Northwest, we're mostly grieving for what had been done to the ancestors of our Native American neighbors.
People grieve for what happened to the Native Americans here in the south too (AND they still hold anger for what happened to themselves during the Civil War which I feel they have every right to). In fact many people in Georgia claim to have Cherokee ancestry because a lot of white settlers took their women as wives when they first came to this country. The Cherokee Rose also happens to be our state flower.
Even dirty racist slave-owning southerners feel bad about how the Native People of this country were treated by the US government.
I think I should say that not all northerners think badly of white southerners.
In fact, I count many white southerners among my favorite people, such as Presidents Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy Carter, and Bill Clinton, authors William Faulkner, and Robert E. Howard, and Anti-Confederate guerrilla leader Newton Knight, just to mention a few.
And I don't think badly of all northerners, just the ones who put me down fot being from the south like my middle school teacher from New Jeresy or my sister's friend who called me a hillbilly because of my accent.
I've been good friends with people from the northern states, but they never put me down because of who I am. Nobody deservedms to be looked down on just because of where they are from.
Agree, absolutely.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
To: TW1ZTY
Its not that you're right, or wrong, its that you're going off half cocked in both this, and in the other thread.
Both northerners you encounter, and your southern neighbors, spout simplistic truisms that are messing with your head.
If you're gonna have any opinion you need to be more educated in the contexts.
Its hard to respond without going into a dissertation.
Don't wanna do that, but I will touch on a couple points.
One:You imply that ONLY the Northern US, ever mistreated the American Indians, and that South didn't. You know full well that that is totally ludicrous and laughable. You know full well that that southern hometown of yours was built on soil stolen from the indigenous people, just like every other town in the USA. Andrew Jackson was a southern slave owning planter, and when he was POTUS he defied the yankees in the supreme court when he ordered the eviction of the Cherokees. Not that the south was worse either. Just saying that you know full well that there would have been no north OR south if White America had not steamrolled across the continent pushing the Indians aside in both regions.
Two:About civil war POWs: both sides would be charged with war crimes today. Thirty thousand Union men, and 26 thousand rebels died as POWs. About ten percent of the total 600 thousand plus who died in the war. Similar large number POWs died held on both sides. The south held about an eighth of a million prisoners, the north held about a quarter of million. So more died in southern camps relative to the population of the camps. But the north had more resources, so it had less "excuse". Part of the problem was that the northerners at the time assumed that the suffering of their guys in southern camps was on purpose so they felt justified in mistreating southern pows.
But more important is this: neither side was very good at taking care of the men its own armies. Men who were not POWs and were marching with their own armies would die like flies of diseases. In every war before the twentieth century around the world more soldiers died BETWEEN battles of diseases than actually died in Battle. And our Civil War was no exception.
140 thousand yankees died in battle, but 220 thousand died of infectious diseases. The south didn't have as good records but the ratio was probably about the same. About three guys died of disease for every two who died in battle.
The first world war was the first American war in which the ratio was about even (about 50-60 thousand guys died of disease and the same number died in battle).
In the second world war 290 thousand Americans died in combat, and about 110 thousand died of diseases. Korea had a similar ratio. In Vietnam only two thousand died of things like malaria, 44 thousand died from enemy action (fire fights, booby traps etc), but another ten thousand died in "vehicle accidents". So by the time of Vietnam things had progressed to the point that almost no one was killed by microbes. Everyone lived long enough to...get killed in combat by other humans! Except that now men were dying from trucks flipping over when the enemy wasn't around. But I digress.
My point is that its not one side or the other being evil. It was just the situation of the times.
^I know right?
Reality is NOT like the movie Mad Max: Fury Road!
Just because where in a war, and everything becomes lawless and desolate does NOT mean we have the right to turn ourselves into careless, bloodthirsty ruffians.
I mean, if there was no law, there'd be no society, and no society means we would've been still cavepeople.
Reality is NOT like the movie Mad Max: Fury Road!
Just because where in a war, and everything becomes lawless and desolate does NOT mean we have the right to turn ourselves into careless, bloodthirsty ruffians.
I mean, if there was no law, there'd be no society, and no society means we would've been still cavepeople.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
That's exactly what I'm saying! Thank you!
![wtg :wtg:](./images/smilies/wtg.gif)
Just like nobody admits that us imprisoning Japanese Americans citizens in internment camps was wrong, and nobody even gives a s**t about what American soldiers did in Abu Ghraib.
The last chapter of Milgram's "Obedience to Authority" discusses the scientific findings in relation to the Vietnam war. It points out that by the criteria that were applied in war crimes trials after WWII, the US armed forces did commit war crimes that warranted the death penalty, and these were not mere aberrations, but part of business as usual.
Just like nobody admits that us imprisoning Japanese Americans citizens in internment camps was wrong, and nobody even gives a s**t about what American soldiers did in Abu Ghraib.
The last chapter of Milgram's "Obedience to Authority" discusses the scientific findings in relation to the Vietnam war. It points out that by the criteria that were applied in war crimes trials after WWII, the US armed forces did commit war crimes that warranted the death penalty, and these were not mere aberrations, but part of business as usual.
They've done things that I felt deserved the death penalty over in the Middle East too. And this is recent stuff!
![Shocked 8O](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Kraichgauer
Veteran
![User avatar](./images/avatars/gallery/Assorted/spiderman20.gif)
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,693
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
![clown :clown:](./images/smilies/icon_clown.gif)
I absolutely agree. Of course the religious right would tell you differently.
I had a teacher in high school who told us she did not believe that dinosaurs ever existed because they weren't mentioned in the bible.
![study :study:](./images/smilies/icon_study.gif)
^Um, okay, look. What was mentioned in the very first stories in the Genesis were mainly for people who don't know how to count to ten. In other words, people were so simple-minded back then to the point where they're literal-minded and not very bright. Explaining scientific methods to those people were an equivalent of trying to teach algebra to a preschooler.
What really sickens me though, I keep hearing people STILL taking things literally today, that they're trying to push others into becoming Christians, otherwise they'll all burn in Hell, and saying that there is no evolution! Seriously, what the heck?!
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Aut teen stepdaughter, possible historical sexual abuse |
04 Dec 2024, 8:44 pm |
Is it OK to always hate some parts of yourself? |
29 Dec 2024, 2:36 pm |
Why so many hate toward women historically into I.T? |
30 Jan 2025, 7:03 am |
Does anyone else hate the NATO phonetic alphabet? |
05 Feb 2025, 3:07 pm |