Page 12 of 14 [ 218 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next


What determines sexuality?
Who you're attracted to 65%  65%  [ 22 ]
Who you have sex with 3%  3%  [ 1 ]
Both 24%  24%  [ 8 ]
None/other 9%  9%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 34

Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

13 Aug 2007, 3:47 pm

AlexC179 wrote:
Sopho wrote:
You can have a preference but still not be 100% one way. I'd say anyone who is gay or straight is most likely 99% one way or whatever. But I don't know. And pansexuals are completely different to bisexuals.


I know they are different, well pansexuals and bisexuals that is. Pansexuals are basically bi though, just they are capable of falling in love with someone regardless of sex. If they can do that, then they are basically bi. 99% is a pretty high percentage and very decisive, but I would say it is a different % for everyone and not just a static %. Most people prefer one sex or another preference wise, even if they are bi or pansexual.


im unfamiliar with pansexual....

does that include animals and inanimate objects?


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl


Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

13 Aug 2007, 3:57 pm

AlexC179 wrote:
Sopho wrote:
You can have a preference but still not be 100% one way. I'd say anyone who is gay or straight is most likely 99% one way or whatever. But I don't know. And pansexuals are completely different to bisexuals.


I know they are different, well pansexuals and bisexuals that is. Pansexuals are basically bi though, just they are capable of falling in love with someone regardless of sex. If they can do that, then they are basically bi. 99% is a pretty high percentage and very decisive, but I would say it is a different % for everyone and not just a static %. Most people prefer one sex or another preference wise, even if they are bi or pansexual.

No. Pansexuals aren't basically bisexual. They are capable of liking someone regardless of sex/gender, yes. But that also includes transgendered people, transexuals etc. Whereas bi=2, just men and women.



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

13 Aug 2007, 3:59 pm

Sedaka wrote:
AlexC179 wrote:
Sopho wrote:
You can have a preference but still not be 100% one way. I'd say anyone who is gay or straight is most likely 99% one way or whatever. But I don't know. And pansexuals are completely different to bisexuals.


I know they are different, well pansexuals and bisexuals that is. Pansexuals are basically bi though, just they are capable of falling in love with someone regardless of sex. If they can do that, then they are basically bi. 99% is a pretty high percentage and very decisive, but I would say it is a different % for everyone and not just a static %. Most people prefer one sex or another preference wise, even if they are bi or pansexual.


im unfamiliar with pansexual....

does that include animals and inanimate objects?

No, just humans. It's also known as omnisexual (although I think there might be a couple of differences between the two, not much though). It basically means you're able to be attracted to a person of any gender/sex. Basically the sex or gender of them doesn't really matter, they could be in a relationship with someone androgynous, a transexual, transgendered people, intersex etc etc.



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

13 Aug 2007, 4:04 pm

Sopho wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
AlexC179 wrote:
Sopho wrote:
You can have a preference but still not be 100% one way. I'd say anyone who is gay or straight is most likely 99% one way or whatever. But I don't know. And pansexuals are completely different to bisexuals.


I know they are different, well pansexuals and bisexuals that is. Pansexuals are basically bi though, just they are capable of falling in love with someone regardless of sex. If they can do that, then they are basically bi. 99% is a pretty high percentage and very decisive, but I would say it is a different % for everyone and not just a static %. Most people prefer one sex or another preference wise, even if they are bi or pansexual.


im unfamiliar with pansexual....

does that include animals and inanimate objects?

No, just humans. It's also known as omnisexual (although I think there might be a couple of differences between the two, not much though). It basically means you're able to be attracted to a person of any gender/sex. Basically the sex or gender of them doesn't really matter, they could be in a relationship with someone androgynous, a transexual, transgendered people, intersex etc etc.

I actually thought that was pansexual before, humans, animals and objects, mostly everything that got in your way, lol.
But I was wrong.


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

13 Aug 2007, 4:40 pm

Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
I am going to wait for others to fight there corner first

Maybe this kinda thing is why you didn't get into Oxford... :lol:
There's no 'can't be bothered' about anything with you. You keep on replying. If you put half the effort you spend accusing me of attention seeking, into coming up with some decent points, maybe we'd be getting somewhere.
You've lost again and again since you joined WP.

I applied for maths dearie, so i dont think they would give a toss about my spag, let along on an internet forum. You didnt get into Oxford either, so dont try that one with me. As for responding to your posts, i was bored. Possibly drunk as well. If I posted any more good points you would just go on, "oh your bigoted", "thats sh**" and so on. When you open your mind a little I may come back and post something. Until then, enjoy your orgy.

lol Difference is: I'm not the one sitting here whining about how the only reason I didn't get into Oxford was because my daddy isn't rich. :cry:
And I know you applied for Maths; they still look at overall intelligence though. And spelling is important. If you don't know the difference between 'there,' 'their' and 'they're,' then you're not going to get into Oxford. :P
I didn't claim that you were bigoted, so why would you think I'd do that if you came up with any more points. You don't have any good ones. That's all it is. If you did, then you'd have posted them; you spent enough time posting as it was. I saw nothing I couldn't easily respond to.
And I don't think I'm the one that needs to open my mind a little. You're the one saying people choose to be gay and transgendered, and how I keep playing loads of games with my life, when you actually know very little about me.

I wasnt whining about it. As for overall intelligence, i think i could have trounced the dimwit students that the college had already taken on. They didnt know about my spelling, so nice try.
Oh, you implied that I was bigoted, even if you didnt directly call me it. And as I said on Intensity, talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

13 Aug 2007, 4:46 pm

Hadron wrote:
talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.

LMAO I'm closed minded?!
Hahahahahahahahaha Shut up Hadron, this is too much. :lol:



Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

13 Aug 2007, 5:05 pm

Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.

LMAO I'm closed minded?!
Hahahahahahahahaha Shut up Hadron, this is too much. :lol:

On homosexuality you definately are, there is a whole thread full of evidence.



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

13 Aug 2007, 5:06 pm

Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.

LMAO I'm closed minded?!
Hahahahahahahahaha Shut up Hadron, this is too much. :lol:

On homosexuality you definately are, there is a whole thread full of evidence.

I'm not actually. You're the one who's straight yet claims that people choose to be gay. lol How the f**k would you know?



Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

13 Aug 2007, 5:11 pm

Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.

LMAO I'm closed minded?!
Hahahahahahahahaha Shut up Hadron, this is too much. :lol:

On homosexuality you definately are, there is a whole thread full of evidence.

I'm not actually. You're the one who's straight yet claims that people choose to be gay. lol How the f**k would you know?

Ways and means, but as you like to point out, we know almost nothing about each other... :p



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

13 Aug 2007, 5:12 pm

Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.

LMAO I'm closed minded?!
Hahahahahahahahaha Shut up Hadron, this is too much. :lol:

On homosexuality you definately are, there is a whole thread full of evidence.

I'm not actually. You're the one who's straight yet claims that people choose to be gay. lol How the f**k would you know?

Ways and means, but as you like to point out, we know almost nothing about each other... :p

Thing is though, the only two points I just made about you are what you've admitted yourself - you're straight, and you think gay people choose to be gay. Whereas you come out with alsorts of BS about me. :wink:



greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

13 Aug 2007, 5:18 pm

Hadron wrote:
I wasnt whining about it. As for overall intelligence, i think i could have trounced the dimwit students that the college had already taken on. They didnt know about my spelling, so nice try.
Oh, you implied that I was bigoted, even if you didnt directly call me it. And as I said on Intensity, talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.

Closed mind? LOL
Isn't this the other way around?
Look here, and open your eyes, and tell me who are really the ones that are closed minded here.
She has good and valuable points, you don't


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

13 Aug 2007, 5:25 pm

greenblue wrote:
Hadron wrote:
I wasnt whining about it. As for overall intelligence, i think i could have trounced the dimwit students that the college had already taken on. They didnt know about my spelling, so nice try.
Oh, you implied that I was bigoted, even if you didnt directly call me it. And as I said on Intensity, talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.

Closed mind? LOL
Isn't this the other way around?
Look here, and open your eyes, and tell me who are really the ones that are closed minded here.
She has good and valuable points, you don't

Is this two on one then. Maybe you should goin Sopho and Sedaka's orgy... :P



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

13 Aug 2007, 5:29 pm

Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Hadron wrote:
I wasnt whining about it. As for overall intelligence, i think i could have trounced the dimwit students that the college had already taken on. They didnt know about my spelling, so nice try.
Oh, you implied that I was bigoted, even if you didnt directly call me it. And as I said on Intensity, talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.

Closed mind? LOL
Isn't this the other way around?
Look here, and open your eyes, and tell me who are really the ones that are closed minded here.
She has good and valuable points, you don't

Is this two on one then. Maybe you should goin Sopho and Sedaka's orgy... :P

It's been 2 on 1 in the opposite direction before. What do you want, some of us to pretend to be as*holes so we can make it easier for you to argue against just one person instead of all of us? :lol:



Hadron
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Aug 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 957
Location: IntensitySquared or Zomg

13 Aug 2007, 5:32 pm

Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Hadron wrote:
I wasnt whining about it. As for overall intelligence, i think i could have trounced the dimwit students that the college had already taken on. They didnt know about my spelling, so nice try.
Oh, you implied that I was bigoted, even if you didnt directly call me it. And as I said on Intensity, talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.

Closed mind? LOL
Isn't this the other way around?
Look here, and open your eyes, and tell me who are really the ones that are closed minded here.
She has good and valuable points, you don't

Is this two on one then. Maybe you should goin Sopho and Sedaka's orgy... :P

It's been 2 on 1 in the opposite direction before. What do you want, some of us to pretend to be as*holes so we can make it easier for you to argue against just one person instead of all of us? :lol:

No, what I would like you to do is stop acting as if being gay is something that is/ should be immune from criticism. Then we could debate. But until you get to that point, this conversation is just going to be a slanging match. Your choice.



Sopho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 10,859

13 Aug 2007, 5:35 pm

Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Hadron wrote:
I wasnt whining about it. As for overall intelligence, i think i could have trounced the dimwit students that the college had already taken on. They didnt know about my spelling, so nice try.
Oh, you implied that I was bigoted, even if you didnt directly call me it. And as I said on Intensity, talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.

Closed mind? LOL
Isn't this the other way around?
Look here, and open your eyes, and tell me who are really the ones that are closed minded here.
She has good and valuable points, you don't

Is this two on one then. Maybe you should goin Sopho and Sedaka's orgy... :P

It's been 2 on 1 in the opposite direction before. What do you want, some of us to pretend to be as*holes so we can make it easier for you to argue against just one person instead of all of us? :lol:

No, what I would like you to do is stop acting as if being gay is something that is/ should be immune from criticism. Then we could debate. But until you get to that point, this conversation is just going to be a slanging match. Your choice.

What's to criticise about being gay? Shall we criticise people for having blue eyes, or black hair, or for being short sighted or left handed? You can criticise having gay sex if you want, but not BEING gay. And if you'd had any decent points in criticising us, fine. But you don't. All you have is "all the bi people will turn gay then there'll be no more babies to pay for my pension! whine, whine, whine..."



Sedaka
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind

13 Aug 2007, 5:37 pm

Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
greenblue wrote:
Hadron wrote:
I wasnt whining about it. As for overall intelligence, i think i could have trounced the dimwit students that the college had already taken on. They didnt know about my spelling, so nice try.
Oh, you implied that I was bigoted, even if you didnt directly call me it. And as I said on Intensity, talking to you about this topic is like dealing with a brick wall, you are totally closed minded on it.

Closed mind? LOL
Isn't this the other way around?
Look here, and open your eyes, and tell me who are really the ones that are closed minded here.
She has good and valuable points, you don't

Is this two on one then. Maybe you should goin Sopho and Sedaka's orgy... :P

It's been 2 on 1 in the opposite direction before. What do you want, some of us to pretend to be as*holes so we can make it easier for you to argue against just one person instead of all of us? :lol:

No, what I would like you to do is stop acting as if being gay is something that is/ should be immune from criticism. Then we could debate. But until you get to that point, this conversation is just going to be a slanging match. Your choice.


how do you gather the argument is to be immune to criticism?

they just want to be equal.

least ragtime is arguing something for why he thinks it's wrong..........

you dont have a reason beyond your pension :roll:


_________________
Neuroscience PhD student

got free science papers?

www.pubmed.gov
www.sciencedirect.com
http://highwire.stanford.edu/lists/freeart.dtl