Does the government own your vagina?
AceOfSpades wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Likewise I wouldn't take someone else's life cuz my own life has become ruined through my own choices.
There's no "someone" involved. If you make abortion illegal, however, there will be numerous "someone"'s involved.
The bacertia you kill with disinfectant cleaner is "life", yet I have no moral interest in perserving it.
Bethie
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02044/020441c7f12f95bb4e369bc68d48e9eb80dc12bf" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster
AceOfSpades wrote:
I wouldn't take someone else's teeth just cuz my own teeth have become ruined through my own choices. Likewise I wouldn't take someone else's life cuz my own life has become ruined through my own choices.
For the love of god.
The vast majority of abortions consist of a woman taking a pill and bleeding into a panty liner for a couple days.
It's easy, as a male, for you to view abortion in terms of "taking life", because you will never so long as you live be host for the better part of a year to a rapidly-growing organism that exerts a massive strain on every system of your body until you're forced to push the huge thing out, most often ripping your most delicate parts and quite possibly risking complications that can turn fatal in an instant.
When you're in a situation where it's even possible for you to be an incubator, we can talk about what you would and would not do if going through the above threatened your ability to provide for your already-existing children, or you knew because of your financial situation your baby would suffer health problems because you could not afford pre-natal care, or if the religious bigots in your town would treat you as a social pariah and shun you, or your parents would throw you out.
Until then, I'm betting you'd pop a pill and ride the cramps for a few days.
_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.
Bethie
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02044/020441c7f12f95bb4e369bc68d48e9eb80dc12bf" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster
AceOfSpades wrote:
Whether or not you see a fetus as a life depends on your stance.
Nope. The fetus is biologically alive and genetically human.
Neither negates a woman's pre-existing autonomy,
nor does such a laughably-subjective concept as "personhood".
_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.
Bethie wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
I wouldn't take someone else's teeth just cuz my own teeth have become ruined through my own choices. Likewise I wouldn't take someone else's life cuz my own life has become ruined through my own choices.
For the love of god.
The vast majority of abortions consist of a woman taking a pill and bleeding into a panty liner for a couple days.
It's easy, as a male, for you to view abortion in terms of "taking life", because you will never so long as you live be host for the better part of a year to a rapidly-growing organism that exerts a massive strain on every system of your body until you're forced to push the huge thing out, most often ripping your most delicate parts and quite possibly risking complications that can turn fatal in an instant.
When you're in a situation where it's even possible for you to be an incubator, we can talk about what you would and would not do if going through the above threatened your ability to provide for your already-existing children, or you knew because of your financial situation your baby would suffer health problems because you could not afford pre-natal care, or if the religious bigots in your town would treat you as a social pariah and shun you, or your parents would throw you out.
Until then, I'm betting you'd pop a pill and ride the cramps for a few days.
Bethie wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Whether or not you see a fetus as a life depends on your stance.
Nope. The fetus is biologically alive and genetically human.
Neither negates a woman's pre-existing autonomy,
nor does such a laughably-subjective concept as "personhood".
AceOfSpades wrote:
And I consider it worthy of being considered a person since it is developing into a full grown baby. To me life starts when sperm becomes fertilized in the ovum. Sperm amounts to nothing until it fertilizes, then it will amount to being a full grown baby.
So why doesn't a hair follicle amount to being a full grown baby? A zygote has little that a hair follicle doesn't.
Master_Pedant wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
And I consider it worthy of being considered a person since it is developing into a full grown baby. To me life starts when sperm becomes fertilized in the ovum. Sperm amounts to nothing until it fertilizes, then it will amount to being a full grown baby.
So why doesn't a hair follicle amount to being a full grown baby? A zygote has little that a hair follicle doesn't.
Except potential to grow into a fetus........................
sorry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0397c/0397c7fb86ea96d31908e70302a52093cb6cd1b7" alt="Sad :("
Master_Pedant wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
And I consider it worthy of being considered a person since it is developing into a full grown baby. To me life starts when sperm becomes fertilized in the ovum. Sperm amounts to nothing until it fertilizes, then it will amount to being a full grown baby.
So why doesn't a hair follicle amount to being a full grown baby? A zygote has little that a hair follicle doesn't.
BurntOutMom wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
And I consider it worthy of being considered a person since it is developing into a full grown baby. To me life starts when sperm becomes fertilized in the ovum. Sperm amounts to nothing until it fertilizes, then it will amount to being a full grown baby.
So why doesn't a hair follicle amount to being a full grown baby? A zygote has little that a hair follicle doesn't.
Except potential to grow into a fetus........................
sorry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0397c/0397c7fb86ea96d31908e70302a52093cb6cd1b7" alt="Sad :("
_________________
.
AceOfSpades wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
And I consider it worthy of being considered a person since it is developing into a full grown baby. To me life starts when sperm becomes fertilized in the ovum. Sperm amounts to nothing until it fertilizes, then it will amount to being a full grown baby.
So why doesn't a hair follicle amount to being a full grown baby? A zygote has little that a hair follicle doesn't.
not most of them.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
Bethie wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Whether or not you see a fetus as a life depends on your stance.
Nope. The fetus is biologically alive and genetically human.
Neither negates a woman's pre-existing autonomy,
nor does such a laughably-subjective concept as "personhood".
To elaborate, sperm are biologically alive and genetically human as well.
_________________
.
Vexcalibur wrote:
BurntOutMom wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
And I consider it worthy of being considered a person since it is developing into a full grown baby. To me life starts when sperm becomes fertilized in the ovum. Sperm amounts to nothing until it fertilizes, then it will amount to being a full grown baby.
So why doesn't a hair follicle amount to being a full grown baby? A zygote has little that a hair follicle doesn't.
Except potential to grow into a fetus........................
sorry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0397c/0397c7fb86ea96d31908e70302a52093cb6cd1b7" alt="Sad :("
True. Should skin cells thus eventually be considered 'human beings' because they have the potential to yield stem cells that could be turned into a cloned human being?
_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do
JakobVirgil wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
And I consider it worthy of being considered a person since it is developing into a full grown baby. To me life starts when sperm becomes fertilized in the ovum. Sperm amounts to nothing until it fertilizes, then it will amount to being a full grown baby.
So why doesn't a hair follicle amount to being a full grown baby? A zygote has little that a hair follicle doesn't.
not most of them.
@ Vexcalibur: And I'm against cloning. But I consider a clone a human being as well once it fertilizes, so I dunno where you're going with it.
Last edited by AceOfSpades on 12 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
AceOfSpades wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
And I consider it worthy of being considered a person since it is developing into a full grown baby. To me life starts when sperm becomes fertilized in the ovum. Sperm amounts to nothing until it fertilizes, then it will amount to being a full grown baby.
So why doesn't a hair follicle amount to being a full grown baby? A zygote has little that a hair follicle doesn't.
Often times, zygotes don't develop into full grown babies. Why don't physicians and medical specialists go out of there way to save every zygote from being reabsorbed into the mother's body?
No zygote is sacred.
AceOfSpades wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
And I consider it worthy of being considered a person since it is developing into a full grown baby. To me life starts when sperm becomes fertilized in the ovum. Sperm amounts to nothing until it fertilizes, then it will amount to being a full grown baby.
So why doesn't a hair follicle amount to being a full grown baby? A zygote has little that a hair follicle doesn't.
not most of them.
No....a fertilized egg can be flushed away very easily so long as it doesn't attach to the wall of the uterus. Fertilized eggs are discarded all the time by women.
_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823
?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson
Vigilans wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
BurntOutMom wrote:
Master_Pedant wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
And I consider it worthy of being considered a person since it is developing into a full grown baby. To me life starts when sperm becomes fertilized in the ovum. Sperm amounts to nothing until it fertilizes, then it will amount to being a full grown baby.
So why doesn't a hair follicle amount to being a full grown baby? A zygote has little that a hair follicle doesn't.
Except potential to grow into a fetus........................
sorry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0397c/0397c7fb86ea96d31908e70302a52093cb6cd1b7" alt="Sad :("
True. Should skin cells thus eventually be considered 'human beings' because they have the potential to yield stem cells that could be turned into a cloned human being?
+1
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Going down to the wire with possible government shutdown |
21 Dec 2024, 12:09 pm |
US government allegedly employ Psionics |
18 Jan 2025, 10:50 pm |
French government is toppled in no-confidence vote |
04 Dec 2024, 4:57 pm |