Page 13 of 16 [ 256 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

mds_02
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,077
Location: Los Angeles

03 Feb 2013, 3:23 pm

hyper, I know that this is more than you asked for. But I figured that, since I brought it up, I may as well give all the reasons why I believe it was her complaints about me, and her influence on other people, that got me fired. And the reasons why I believe I was not actually behaving inappropriately.

There was one particular woman at the job who would describe me in various negative ways, including at least one use of the word creep that I heard, because of my tendency to keep to myself. I overheard her talking about me on one occasion, and heard more than once from others that she was doing so.

I know that it was because I kept to myself because, the one time I overheard her, she was saying how creepy it was that I sat by myself at lunch (this was not very long after I'd started there, once I'd been there a while I started getting closer to a few coworkers). And because I literally never interacted with her in any way beyond maybe saying "hi" or "good morning" as we were all arriving at the start of the day (which I stopped doing immediately as soon as I had the slightest inkling that she disliked me).

The reason I believe she had an influence on other coworkers is because I noticed certain people going out of their way to avoid me, most of them people she worked closely with.

The reason I believe I was not actually doing anything inappropriate is because the people who I worked closely with never had any problem with me. Eventually we even started hanging out outside of work. And my direct supervisor liked me enough that, whenever he was away, he chose me to cover for him.

The reason I believe she got me fired is because, when the people from HR sat me down to tell me, the thing that kept coming up was "personality clashes with coworkers."

Unfortunately, I have no case for wrongful dismissal. Pretty much all employment here is considered to be "at will."

The Supreme Court of California wrote:
[A]n employer may terminate its employees at will, for any or no reason ... the employer may act peremptorily, arbitrarily, or inconsistently, without providing specific protections such as prior warning, fair procedures, objective evaluation, or preferential reassignment ... The mere existence of an employment relationship affords no expectation, protectable by law, that employment will continue, or will end only on certain conditions, unless the parties have actually adopted such terms.



DialAForAwesome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,189
Location: That place with the thing

03 Feb 2013, 3:27 pm

Tequila wrote:
DialAForAwesome wrote:
You're gonna hate what I have to say then, because I do this exact thing.


I never said the comment that you quote. seaturtleisland said that.


Whoops. :oops:

What I said still stands though. It's depressing. :cry:


_________________
I don't trust anyone because I'm cynical.
I'm cynical because I don't trust anyone.


LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

03 Feb 2013, 5:40 pm

Venger wrote:
lol, You don't even know what ASPD is. It stands for "antisocial personality disorder" or "sociopath" for short.

It's not the same thing as AS or ASD.

My mistake. I was assuming it was shorthand for Autism SPectrum Disorders.


MDS, your case sounds less like 'creep shaming' than like 'Aspie bullying.' "Creep" is just the word that one bully used in your case, but that doesn't mean that the word itself is bad any more than any other negative descriptor is bad.



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

03 Feb 2013, 5:51 pm

LKL wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
LKL wrote:
I'm not saying that the term 'creepy' is predictive of rapists, any more than the term 'toxic' is predictive of mutagenic chemicals. I'm saying that, correctly used, the term applies to behaviors that are indicative of someone who does not see a woman as a whole human being with human rights.

Sorry, but I only entered this thread on page 9 in response to a request for data on antisocial tendencies and sex crimes. IMO, creepy as defined as "Behaviours that are indicative of someone who does not see a woman as a whole human being with human rights" is a fluffy normative category, and thus beyond the scope of scientific inquiry.

Oh, and you don't have a monopoly on "correct" use of words.

Ok, you think it's 'fluffy,' and that's fine - but you don't get to monopolize words any more than I do, and I know exactly what I mean, and what most women mean, when they say that a man is 'creepy.'
We've been trying to get you to understand it, but maybe it's just beyond the comprehension of most men.

Nice ad hominem.

Oh, and you don't have privileged access to the minds of other women, either.

Nor have you provided evidence that the "creepy" label has any meaningful correlation to actual harassing, violating or otherwise offensive behaviour.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

03 Feb 2013, 5:58 pm

GGPViper wrote:
LKL wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
LKL wrote:
I'm not saying that the term 'creepy' is predictive of rapists, any more than the term 'toxic' is predictive of mutagenic chemicals. I'm saying that, correctly used, the term applies to behaviors that are indicative of someone who does not see a woman as a whole human being with human rights.

Sorry, but I only entered this thread on page 9 in response to a request for data on antisocial tendencies and sex crimes. IMO, creepy as defined as "Behaviours that are indicative of someone who does not see a woman as a whole human being with human rights" is a fluffy normative category, and thus beyond the scope of scientific inquiry.

Oh, and you don't have a monopoly on "correct" use of words.

Ok, you think it's 'fluffy,' and that's fine - but you don't get to monopolize words any more than I do, and I know exactly what I mean, and what most women mean, when they say that a man is 'creepy.'
We've been trying to get you to understand it, but maybe it's just beyond the comprehension of most men.

Nice ad hominem.

Oh, and you don't have privileged access to the minds of other women, either.

Nor have you provided evidence that the "creepy" label has any meaningful correlation to actual harassing, violating or otherwise offensive behaviour.

1)Given that nothing I said was reflective of your character, I do not see how that could have been an ad-hominem.
2)Of course not, but in areas where women, in general, take one side and men, in general, take the other side, it's a good hint that the women understand women better and the men understand men better.
3)I have provided plenty of evidence - which I get a strong feeling that no one here bothered to read.



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

03 Feb 2013, 6:55 pm

LKL wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
LKL wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
LKL wrote:
I'm not saying that the term 'creepy' is predictive of rapists, any more than the term 'toxic' is predictive of mutagenic chemicals. I'm saying that, correctly used, the term applies to behaviors that are indicative of someone who does not see a woman as a whole human being with human rights.

Sorry, but I only entered this thread on page 9 in response to a request for data on antisocial tendencies and sex crimes. IMO, creepy as defined as "Behaviours that are indicative of someone who does not see a woman as a whole human being with human rights" is a fluffy normative category, and thus beyond the scope of scientific inquiry.

Oh, and you don't have a monopoly on "correct" use of words.

Ok, you think it's 'fluffy,' and that's fine - but you don't get to monopolize words any more than I do, and I know exactly what I mean, and what most women mean, when they say that a man is 'creepy.'
We've been trying to get you to understand it, but maybe it's just beyond the comprehension of most men.

Nice ad hominem.

Oh, and you don't have privileged access to the minds of other women, either.

Nor have you provided evidence that the "creepy" label has any meaningful correlation to actual harassing, violating or otherwise offensive behaviour.

1)Given that nothing I said was reflective of your character, I do not see how that could have been an ad-hominem.
2)Of course not, but in areas where women, in general, take one side and men, in general, take the other side, it's a good hint that the women understand women better and the men understand men better.
3)I have provided plenty of evidence - which I get a strong feeling that no one here bothered to read.


1) "We've been trying to get you to understand it, but maybe it's just beyond the comprehension of most men." Thinly veiled accusation that the person you are debating lacks the intellectual capacity to comprehend the subject. Subtle, though, which is why I called it "Nice".

2) No. It is a good hint of partisanship.

3) Where?



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

03 Feb 2013, 8:49 pm

mds_02 wrote:

Begging your pardon, but that's just not true. I've dealt with the consequences myself. Which have included getting fired from the best job I've ever had, among other problems.



Sorry, but people get canned for not "fitting in" at work all the time. It doesn't just happen to "creepy" men.

Quote:
Women on this board get upset when men act as though they have a better understanding of what women have to put up with. I'm not upset, but please don't act as though you know better than I do the kind of stuff men who've been labelled that way have to endure.


I was making factual observations as to what does NOT happen to men who are considered "creepy." Unless you can provide evidence where "creepy" men are charged higher taxes, or put in concentration camps, my statements stand. I fail to see that the consequences of being considered "creepy" are any greater than those stemming from people thinking you're gay, you're the wrong religion, you're smelly, or your personality just plain sucks.

And I've been socially ostracized for being "weird." It's not a male-specific problem.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


answeraspergers
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 811
Location: uk

04 Feb 2013, 1:06 am

Maybe being called that is part of the reason for not fitting in?

Do you know what a fact is? As a female are you best placed to comment?

The consequences are much the same as being called a whore for women. Loss of status, respect, fondness etc designed to lower the chances of you breeding and shame them.



mds_02
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,077
Location: Los Angeles

04 Feb 2013, 6:48 am

LKL wrote:
MDS, your case sounds less like 'creep shaming' than like 'Aspie bullying.' "Creep" is just the word that one bully used in your case, but that doesn't mean that the word itself is bad any more than any other negative descriptor is bad.


Either way, my basic points still stand; that sometimes the word is used for spurious reasons, and that saying that sort of stuff about someone can have real consequences for that person. So maybe people should examine their motives, and whether or not the person has really done anything wrong, before bad mouthing someone.



mds_02
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Sep 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,077
Location: Los Angeles

04 Feb 2013, 6:54 am

XFilesGeek wrote:
I was making factual observations as to what does NOT happen to men who are considered "creepy." Unless you can provide evidence where "creepy" men are charged higher taxes, or put in concentration camps, my statements stand. I fail to see that the consequences of being considered "creepy" are any greater than those stemming from people thinking you're gay, you're the wrong religion, you're smelly, or your personality just plain sucks.


You very specifically said that there were no consequences for someone labelled as creepy. I was pointing out that there are. No, they do not have to deal with those specific things, but those are hardly the only negative consequences a person might face. And just because other groups may face the same problems does not mean that this group does not face them as well.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

04 Feb 2013, 6:56 am

mds_02 wrote:
Either way, my basic points still stand; that sometimes the word is used for spurious reasons, and that saying that sort of stuff about someone can have real consequences for that person. So maybe people should examine their motives, and whether or not the person has really done anything wrong, before bad mouthing someone.


This. It could lend weight in other people's eyes to an already-existing prejudice.

Like I say, there is certainly behaviour from men (or women) that deserve the label, and there probably cases where a woman - or man - should say something, but doesn't. That doesn't mean that it's OK to throw around words like that willy-nilly as a way of spreading rumours about someone you just don't like the look of.



JNathanK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,177

04 Feb 2013, 5:23 pm

Image

I just wouldn't worry about it. if you know you're not a creep, that's all that matters. Don't let fear of other peoples perceptions make you act weird.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

04 Feb 2013, 6:29 pm

mds_02 wrote:
XFilesGeek wrote:
I was making factual observations as to what does NOT happen to men who are considered "creepy." Unless you can provide evidence where "creepy" men are charged higher taxes, or put in concentration camps, my statements stand. I fail to see that the consequences of being considered "creepy" are any greater than those stemming from people thinking you're gay, you're the wrong religion, you're smelly, or your personality just plain sucks.


You very specifically said that there were no consequences for someone labelled as creepy. I was pointing out that there are. No, they do not have to deal with those specific things, but those are hardly the only negative consequences a person might face. And just because other groups may face the same problems does not mean that this group does not face them as well.


And I'm trying to understand how "creepy" is different from being considered a "jerkwad," a "twerp," a "goon," or any other negative perception a person might suffer from.

Basically, your entire point seems to be that people shouldn't say mean things about each other, which I agree with, but I'm still not getting why "creepy" in particular warrants specific attention.

There are people I've thought of as "creepy," and I'm not overly interested if anyone else would agree with my assessment. If calling someone "creepy" is to be avoided at all costs, even more so than calling someone a "jerkwad," I need an actual reason.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


DialAForAwesome
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Oct 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,189
Location: That place with the thing

04 Feb 2013, 7:47 pm

JNathanK wrote:
Image

I just wouldn't worry about it. if you know you're not a creep, that's all that matters. Don't let fear of other peoples perceptions make you act weird.


Too bad it doesn't work that way. The word has very real consequences, as has been stated over and over.....and over again.

It's not like if you got called a poophead or something. That blows over. But "creep" doesn't blow over.


_________________
I don't trust anyone because I'm cynical.
I'm cynical because I don't trust anyone.


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

04 Feb 2013, 7:59 pm

DialAForAwesome wrote:
But "creep" doesn't blow over.


Indeed. 'Creep' carries connotations that 'poophead' or 'idiot' or 'moron' doesn't. It alludes to predatory inclinations.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

04 Feb 2013, 8:18 pm

DialAForAwesome wrote:
JNathanK wrote:
Image

I just wouldn't worry about it. if you know you're not a creep, that's all that matters. Don't let fear of other peoples perceptions make you act weird.


Too bad it doesn't work that way. The word has very real consequences, as has been stated over and over.....and over again.

It's not like if you got called a poophead or something. That blows over. But "creep" doesn't blow over.


Someone who got fired for being a "poophead" would probably disagree.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)