Atheist kills muslims and Gun Control a bad thing?

Post Reply New Topic

No, I shall reiterate: I am anti-nut with a gun, not anti-gun.

^
Okay Mr photographic memory for text, if you think I'm 'projecting', surely someone with your unique talent should have no problem providing quotes of me behaving like what I'm accusing Bill of, e.g. being a mindless partisan, broad brushing groups I know nothing about, talking out of my ass, etc. I'll wait, but in the meantime I'd like to talk about the irony of bullying accusations coming from the worst internet tough guy on WP, the kind of blowhard who can't go 3 posts without mentioning how much he can bench or how his Kung Fu is superior to everyone else's, etc; it's a bit like being lectured on the dangers of currency inflation by Robert Mugabe. Perhaps you should stay in your own lane.

Well if you pay attention to what I wrote, I only quoted what I could prove, as all the other stuff was a matter of opinion.

All I said is there is no record of Bill Lying per being dishonest.

So in fact, you lied by saying that UNLESS YOU CAN PROVE THAT HE DID.

I've read his writings here and it does not exist on the record. And if you wonder how I keep up with all of that I read 10 to 15 times faster than the average human being, along with that close to photographic memory for text, per my Hyperlexic version of Autism.

Oh and by the way, when properly focused I can type with speeds approaching 130 words a minute, AND that in part explains literally close to 10 million words typed online since the end of 2010, that are documented still in black and white and green and gray and other colors for purview.

I WILL apologize if you can prove otherwise on the Bill being dishonest thingy.

Otherwise, it is you lying to say he is lying, if YOU CANNOT QUOTE IT to prove it, as it is YOU THAT MADE THE ASSERTION, LIE OR NOT.

AND THAT my friend is projection more or less, as metaphor.

And as far as me being an Internet tough guy I can prove it PER REAL LIFE with videos and photographs, how about you, as all I see so far is a rifle and you in an avatar.

AN INTERNET tough guy is a guy who is all full of talk and can't prove the walk.

I on the other hand can prove IT online per the close to half a ton of moving weight in leg press with my legs for 12 reps and already have documented over 3000 miles per Nike GPS Sports Watch in a dance walk of mixed martial arts and ballet over the course of 17 months..

I am known for being as tough as I am graceful, and In real life folks CALL ME A LEGEND.

It's an extreme advantage in real life in all avenues of it to be TOUGH AND GRACEFUL PER the divine survival and Love thingy. It's an IDEOLOGY that should be PROMOTED BOTH ONLINE AND IN REAL LIFE IN MY OPINION, AS IT IS A GOOD THING NOT A BAD THING, IN MY opinion, NOW.

IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE, on the legend thingy, YOU CAN CALL SEVILLE QUARTER IN PENSACOLA FL, the place that folks routinely call me a legend of dance, and ask any employee about the big guy with shades that blows the place away with HIS STYLE of dance, now going on 48 weeks straight every Thursday Night for three or four hours straight without a break or a drink of water, except for one week with an intestinal bug.. not the thing ya wanna have when ya dance.. haHA!..

But anyway, you came here to defend Raptor, specifically on these points, and I came here to defend Bill; So TIT FOR TAT; CALL IT COGNITIVE EMPATHY; OR WHATEVER but it is what I do best, defend others from bullies, either intellectual or physical ones.

And if you made a mistake, you can just apologize, if you like, AND IF YOU CAN, and go on.

But that will truly surprise me, and at this point in my life I am used to surprises; however, with you I am not expecting one, almost never the more... AND IN A Way... SADLY enough to me... for you.. per that cognitive empathy thingy.....

..As I have read what you write here.. as well....Mr. Smarty Pants.. 'who' THINKS 'HE'S' ALWAYS RIGHT...

I CHOOSE MY WORDS CAREFULLY.. very carefully.. even the metaphors that some folks see as gibberish...

^
I'll link some stuff out later when I'm on my desktop, but I think kind of win by default after that response, I mean 'legend', really?

Yes, 'Legend', really..

Not my words ALONE, the words of others, TOO.

And by the way, I have been termed that here, as well..

Quote and link, available, upon request.

I always come armed with metaphors and

FACTS.

And those are the BIG GUNS I WAS TALKING ABOUT TOO..

BUT YES, i can curl over 200 LBS with my arms too that is also documented and shared here too, by way of photographic evidence, and links, as well..

If that avatar is not enough, for proof alone.

Oh and by the way, I've never ever talked about how much weight I can bench here, so that is another mistruth that YOU CANNOT QUOTE, AS IT DOES NOT EXIST, HERE.

OH AND BY THE WAY, I've never ever said my Kung FU skills are superior to anyone else's. And for that matter I've clearly stated many times that I've never had a Martial ARTS lesson, and only been identified as a person with expert level Kung FU skills defined by THAT military specialist and not me.

YOU ARE digging a hole deeper, my friend, not shallower.. it seems at this point.. to me..

Remember, I am the one with the close to photographic memory thingy FOR TEXT, and so far you are proving you don't have CLOSE TO THAT....

AND FINALLY, REAL TOUGH GUYS don't usually do the bullying thing, as they truly have nothing to prove, when it comes to flesh and blood REAL life and are confident enough in themselves to be enough as is.

ON the Internet, proof is required, obviously; so I provide that and also inspire others with it, who are not jealous or whatever.....

You are very welcome.

*sigh*

I almost feel like I can't respond at this point without getting into baby seal clubbing territory, even if said baby seal seem to have been hitting the bull shark testosterone a little hard lately.

NOPE, ACTUALLY my testosterone is 277, as low as an 'average' 75 year old man, documented in my latest medical record this year.

AND I CAN STILL MOVE METAPHORICAL MOUNTAINS, AS DOCUMENTED TOO.

Trust me, I'm much too clever PER documented at this point, for your games or whatever it is you are doing..

Personally, I think you are just confused, and that is all, MY FRIEND, or whatever....

And what you are likely REALLY DOING HERE, IS JUST AN EXCUSE not to provide the so-called evidence above.. about Bill's so called dishonesty, you suggested you would provide earlier when you get back to your 'computer'.

I've dealt with about 100K real flesh and blood human beings over decades of real life interaction, in the rough and tumble military territory, as well.

Ain't nothing here that comes close to surprising me.....

Dishonest? How is it dishonest if my values and political ideology resembles those of current liberalism? And on the gun topic; I admit I sometimes have been guilty of hyperbole in the past when my blood is up and I don't want to back down. That said, I see nothing dishonest about stating that I have a problem with wing nuts with guns, NOT ordinary gun owners.
And on the subject of parroting political stances, I might remind you how you have taken such a die hard libertarian stand that you have stated more than once that it's wrong for private businesses to have to serve people who belong to groups they hate. Or how you had defended Rand Paul's choice of hiring on his staff a fringe right wing radio personality who calls himself the "Southern Avenger" (he wears a wrestling mask in public), and promotes the completely racist, and discredited Neo-Confederate pseudo-history. When I had brought this fact up to you in the past, you defended Paul by saying he couldn't be faulted by standing by his friends. Well, yes he can, especially if he knows that friend to be a racist douche bag, but hires him anyhow. C'mon, I know you're not a racist, Dox; just admit you tow the party more often than you should, yourself.

like a criminal knows they are a criminal? strangely a good amount of them think they aren't and are doing whats right in their eyes, just as most slackers (real ones) i've met don't consider themselves such, they free spirits etc.

as much as me and you can agree that anti gun people shouldn't be able to define gun laws and gun rights, anti welfare people should not' be able to define whos a slacker and hows deserving.

Nothing wrong with being a free spirit. Those who use the term "slacker" in such a negative connotation (a certain someone with a Dirty Harry avatar) has an over puckered anu - - -I better stop here, or else the moderators will lock this discussion.

Bill, how many times have I questioned your reading comprehension skills because you've responded to something far removed from what I or someone else has actually written? Take that number and add one, cause you're doing it yet again. I didn't say, and never have said, that your politics and beliefs make you dishonest, I've called you that because you've repeatedly put words in my mouth and misstated things I've said and what motivates me, and others as well. You also have an amazing ability to lose an argument, concede a point, and then make the exact same point that you have already conceded is wrong days or weeks later, e.g. Ruby Ridge, which I noticed you brought up in another thread, again, not exactly a charming characteristic. Now, at this point, I don't know if you're willfully dishonest, stubborn to the point of convincing yourself that you're not lying when you are, or, forgive me, simply unable to comprehend what is actually being said and/or remember what has been previously said, but none of is good for you, and it makes it difficult for me to modulate my reactions to what you say, as I don't know if I'm dealing with malice or malady.



Let me stop you right there, as you're about to engage in your very favorite stupid arguing trick, seeking moral equivalence. See, here's the thing, even if I were the most partisan libertarian (sort of an oxymoron considering the state of libertarian party unity & cohesiveness...), it would not mean that you aren't a Democratic partisan of the first order who has no business criticizing someone who actually has changed their opinions, making us hypocrites together, but not absolving you of anything. Just like the fact that W was a sh***y president doesn't absolve Obama of shittyness, though you've never exactly followed that argument either.



I don't think you understand how principles work, Bill; I think 'my house my rules' applies to businesses whether I agree with their rules or not, I don't believe in thought policing and have many friends personally who hold view I find abhorrent and or stupid, many of whom I would employ regardless of those disagreements. Unlike you, I don't apply different standards to different people depending upon whether I agree with them or not, that's basic intellectual consistency, something partisans such as yourself lack, as you decide whether to criticize or commend based on politics, not principles.

Funny how your memory suddenly started working there for a minute, too bad it still conveniently managed to miss all the points that I disagree with doctrinaire libertarians on, such as supporting social safety nets, to name but one very large example. Also, the fact that you're trying to equate one faulty example with years of never straying from the party line is telling.

Really, at this point, what else is there for me to say? Your posts are all the same, rehashed MSNBC talking points mixed in with jabs at straw-man conservatives and libertarians and hypocritical attacks on people for doing the exact same things you do, which you largely get away with because your politics happen to align with those of the board in general. People don't attack you for your liberalism, WP is full of liberals that can accurately articulate both their own positions and those of their opponents and discuss them reasonably, people attack you for the clueless and hypocritical way that you attack others that contest your beliefs.

Think real hard and sober up before responding, you wouldn't want to say something rash.

Is Charlie Sheen or Mike Tyson missing, by chance? I think I may have found at least one of them...

If I have to take a choice between stubbornness, lack of comprehension, or lying, I'll take being stubborn. Please, do not accuse me of lying.
And as for "house rules," believe what you want, but it hardly makes it right, particularly since that very practice was used against black Americans during segregation, and is now being used against the LGBT community. What's right is right, and what's wrong is wrong, and denying service to anyone in order to dehumanize them is clearly wrong.
And of course I'm going to make the same kinds of arguments against conservatives and libertarians who use that kind of arguments against me and my fellow liberals, moral equivalency, strawmen, and all.
And as a matter of fact, "rash" is my middle name.

Actually, I haven't been compared to those two, until now, which kinda appears to be the projection thingy again BUT HONESTLY IN MY LIFE i've been compared to Jesus, Buddha, Superman (FOR intellectual, work, and physical related feats, separately as such, if ya wanna call that a trinity of abilities), Walt Whitman, and two of those folks specifically on this Internet site, per Whitman and Buddha; again quotes and links available on those two; OH and yes, perhaps the greatest compliment is being compared to GOD, again quotes and links available on that one too, from this Internet site, recently IN FACT, AS WELL.

What you FAIL to realize, APPARENTLY, is I (per what I can now DO) am my own research project and I JUST provide the results of that here, on request, AND as a pastime of sorts PER MY OWN SCIENTIFIC (systemizing) BASED PROJECT OF PURSUING HUMAN POTENTIAL AND DOCUMENTING THE AMAZING RESULTS AND HOW I DO IT AS SUCH, SO OTHER FOLKS MIGHT BE ABLE TO DO IT TOO.

IT'S ACTUALLY A LABOR OF LOVE, BUT IT DOESN'T APPEAR THAT YOU SPEAK 'THAT' LANGUAGE, and that's ok as the world needs folks LIKE YOU, AS WELL, which includes Sheen and Tyson as 'part of that' CATEGORY....

PER NOT DOING THE LANGUAGE OF LOVE THINGY.......

AKA COGNITIVE EMPATHY EXPRESSED AFFECTIVELY and effectively AND STUFF LIKE THAT.

HUMANS who realize their fuller HUMAN potential don't go around hurling insults they CANNOT BACK UP WITH FACTS.

SHOW ME YOU HAVE ENOUGH EMPATHY PER THAT MOST IMPORTANT TYPE OF HUMAN COGNITION PER THE SOCIAL TYPE TO APOLOGIZE TO BILL for YOUR unfounded accusation of him being dishonest and MAKE MY DAY or yours for fuller human potential OR NOT.

OR KEEP ON DIGGING...

This is kinda fun for me.....

Oh and by the way, as part of that research project, I collect comments people provide to me along the way of expanding my human potential, and those comments include MVP of dance, the Legend thingy, Awesome, Amazing, AN INSPIRATION FOR DANCE, AN INSPIRATION 'PERIOD', FAMOUS ON FACEBOOK FOR DANCE, BOSS OF DANCE, and THE BEST OF all is strangers, albeit all females, coming up and telling me they love me just 'cause they enjoy the art of my free style of dance, per the gift of art I give freely to others, everywhere I go.

The guys just high five me, and bump fists, and just tell me they wanted to meet me cause they heard about me in my metro area (the legend of dance thingy) and that's cool too.

And then there are people like you... who amuse me.. more than anything else....

In other words, I am inspired by darkness too.....

As I for one leave no stone unturned dark or light, without something to learn and improve.....

And that my friend is called HUMAN POTENTIAL.. EXERCISED AND practiced as such.. IN REAL LIFE, AND online too....

And finally even my 'sh**' has been described as HOLy.



By the female gym attendant who documented one of the reps when I was only at 810 LBS at 12 reps, instead of 930 LBS at 12 reps now.

The other 11 reps are documented in the link in the comments section of the youtube link.

Again, I come armed with evidence, always.....

Aghogday-

I appreciate the gesture, but I doubt I'll get an apology from Dox, anymore than we could get the earth to reverse rotation.
By the way, that leg press was pretty damn impressive!