16 Jun 2015, 2:36 am
Lintar wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Lintar wrote:
No, the technical term is 'well-informed'.
I'm a credentialed gunsmith with 15+ years of firearms experience residing in the US, the jurisdiction in question; you're a foreign national with no demonstrated knowledge of or experience with firearms trying to tell me that you know more about both my culture and my firearms than I do. See the problem yet?
No demonstrated knowledge - well, believe it or not, I used to belong to a shooting club about 20 years ago. I had a licence, gun (.22 rifle), and for a while it was a hobby, but I just ended up getting bored with it all, and lost any residual need I may have had to make things go BANG! In other words, I matured.
WOW
You had a .22 then outgrew silly things that go "bang"?
Gee, arent you a big boy!
16 Jun 2015, 10:08 am
Dox47 wrote:
heavenlyabyss wrote:
I didn't call you paranoid. I called myself paranoid.
I wasn't speaking of you personally that time, I was merely pointing out that you were describing a paranoid fear that you even admit isn't really rational, but when I or people like me express similar but more factual opinions, we are mocked and called paranoid.
Quote:
Anyway, the way you talk to people comes off as combative and defensive at times. It often seems like you're more interested in winning an argument than anything else. You pride yourself on reason but you show obvious signs of emotionality.
Quote:
It goes both ways. People don't want to converse with you because you come across as condescending yourself. Nobody even wants to have a rational conversation with you since you get under people's skin so much. You provoke people into attacking you often. I'm not saying they are right to attack you but it goes both ways.
You feel defensive because so many people disagree with you. The least you could do is admit the defensiveness. That would be intellectually honest at least.
You feel defensive because so many people disagree with you. The least you could do is admit the defensiveness. That would be intellectually honest at least.
As far as I know the only people boycotting me are His Partisanship and his sidekick, Eeyore, but even assuming that there are others, I'm willing to bet I'm not missing out on much intellectual stimulation. What you see as defensiveness is really exasperation and irritation due to being the best informed and most experience person here concerning a particular issue, and still having people who have no idea what they're talking about think they know better than I do, people such as yourself. It's a little like being a biologist at a creationist convention, logic and reason and facts are useless, so I've actually stopped trying to win arguments and have been pursuing more of a 'discredit and move along' strategy. It's pretty easy when the people I argue with often don't seem to know which end the bullet comes out of yet think they should have a say in legislating firearms policy, like having the Amish design highways...
Also, ad hominem
Bullcrap;
you think you know more
about 'guns' here than anyone else.
And that's all.
I can prove I know much more than you about 'guns'.
But you are not worth the time or effort, nor or guns, to make much effort..
Just another area of technical expertise; I gET bored of LONG LONG AGO..
You are transparent as your 'tough guy logo' that goes knuckle dragging nerd or whatever; in your words not mine.
This is a general area where you a Know a little bit more about something than most 'nerds' don't give a crap about;
so it is a 'perfect place' for you and 'Raptor boy' to feed your intellectual bully egos;
and before you tell me you are a big man, show me where you
are fearless enough to dance naked before the world;
the ultimate expression of manliness is not
fearing to show your real stuff;
the real gun is more impressive;
than metal ones..
Same reason OVERALL;
'rednecks' buy big trucks;
to compensate
for other
worries;
like being
not as BIG
AND strong as
'daddy'
is..
THAT'S truly the part of America
that still s**KS; IMHO;
the most ignorant
part
of all; guns or
NOT; but
guns are most
definitely a symptom
of
EQUALIZING Freudian
THAT; yeah; Lintar
knows more about
'real guns' than
both of you put
together; two..
Real intelligence is
emotional intelligence; the
rest is just grade school stuff..
16 Jun 2015, 10:24 am
Once again the hog has spoken. 
16 Jun 2015, 10:25 am
Raptor wrote:
Lintar wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
Lintar wrote:
No, the technical term is 'well-informed'.
I'm a credentialed gunsmith with 15+ years of firearms experience residing in the US, the jurisdiction in question; you're a foreign national with no demonstrated knowledge of or experience with firearms trying to tell me that you know more about both my culture and my firearms than I do. See the problem yet?
No demonstrated knowledge - well, believe it or not, I used to belong to a shooting club about 20 years ago. I had a licence, gun (.22 rifle), and for a while it was a hobby, but I just ended up getting bored with it all, and lost any residual need I may have had to make things go BANG! In other words, I matured.
WOW
You had a .22 then outgrew silly things that go "bang"?
Gee, arent you a big boy!
Ditto above; in response to this too..
16 Jun 2015, 10:25 am
Raptor wrote:
Once again the hog has spoken.
But seriously that was funny and made me smile..
All that's missing is the 'shades'..
And 'the gun' of course..
But trust me; 'my
gun(S)' is/are easily
found
in
a 'full
body' of
ART work
online;
fearless in truth
as such..
Oh and by the way;
"Spiderman exists";
he's not wimpy though;
weighing in at 232 LBS of
SOLID KICK BUTT MUSCLE..
Too much hog for you to handle
friend; without your metal toys for sure..
16 Jun 2015, 10:51 am
Or should I say the 
has spoken.....
16 Jun 2015, 10:58 am
Raptor wrote:
Fugu wrote:
Raptor wrote:
heavenlyabyss wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
As a side note, I'm fine with being called a nut if I am in turn allowed to use the appropriate terminology for people who have no idea what they're talking about and yet loudly proclaim their rightness and righteousness in the most condescending and obnoxious manner possible; I believe the technical term is as*holes.
It goes both ways. People don't want to converse with you because you come across as condescending yourself. Nobody even wants to have a rational conversation with you since you get under people's skin so much. You provoke people into attacking you often. I'm not saying they are right to attack you but it goes both ways.
You feel defensive because so many people disagree with you. The least you could do is admit the defensiveness. That would be intellectually honest at least.
Oh, take a pill.
Do you have any idea the kind of shallow, uninformed, willfully ignorant, arrogant, intellectual dishonest, and just plain nuttiness we on the pro-gun side have had to cope with here over the past several years? And it seems like it's the same people but with different usernames that we deal with because the same tired and simpleminded rhetoric is constantly repeated by all of them.
Go back and do some research on these threads whydoncha....
Okay, so let's pretend that we have no constitution nor human rights in general and are all mere serfs.
Please tell us what "sane gun control" is and what the results have historically been in the US.
Last edited by Fugu on 16 Jun 2015, 11:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
16 Jun 2015, 11:00 am
Raptor wrote:
Or should I say the
has spoken.....
nice for you to demonstrate what a weak argument is, so aghogday can take notes on how to sling ad hominems around as well.
has spoken.....
16 Jun 2015, 11:02 am
Raptor wrote:
Or should I say the
has spoken.....
has spoken.....
In that case; go ahead feed me; yes 'make my day';
trust me; you wouldn't want to see
me really angry..
nor would
anyone else;
for that matter;
nor has anyone
else ever seen
me angry; except
for GOD; I joke here;
and that's all; life's way
too short not to lighten crap pie up
just a little bit, at least; it's worth a try..
Last edited by aghogday on 16 Jun 2015, 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
16 Jun 2015, 11:02 am
Fugu wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Fugu wrote:
Raptor wrote:
heavenlyabyss wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
As a side note, I'm fine with being called a nut if I am in turn allowed to use the appropriate terminology for people who have no idea what they're talking about and yet loudly proclaim their rightness and righteousness in the most condescending and obnoxious manner possible; I believe the technical term is as*holes.
It goes both ways. People don't want to converse with you because you come across as condescending yourself. Nobody even wants to have a rational conversation with you since you get under people's skin so much. You provoke people into attacking you often. I'm not saying they are right to attack you but it goes both ways.
You feel defensive because so many people disagree with you. The least you could do is admit the defensiveness. That would be intellectually honest at least.
Oh, take a pill.
Do you have any idea the kind of shallow, uninformed, willfully ignorant, arrogant, intellectual dishonest, and just plain nuttiness we on the pro-gun side have had to cope with here over the past several years? And it seems like it's the same people but with different usernames that we deal with because the same tired and simpleminded rhetoric is constantly repeated by all of them.
Go back and do some research on these threads whydoncha....
Okay, so let's pretend that we have no constitution nor human rights in general and are all mere serfs.
Please tell us what "sane gun control" is and what the results have historically been in the US.
In other words, you have no answer.
Just as I thought.....
16 Jun 2015, 11:07 am
Raptor wrote:
Fugu wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Fugu wrote:
Raptor wrote:
heavenlyabyss wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
As a side note, I'm fine with being called a nut if I am in turn allowed to use the appropriate terminology for people who have no idea what they're talking about and yet loudly proclaim their rightness and righteousness in the most condescending and obnoxious manner possible; I believe the technical term is as*holes.
It goes both ways. People don't want to converse with you because you come across as condescending yourself. Nobody even wants to have a rational conversation with you since you get under people's skin so much. You provoke people into attacking you often. I'm not saying they are right to attack you but it goes both ways.
You feel defensive because so many people disagree with you. The least you could do is admit the defensiveness. That would be intellectually honest at least.
Oh, take a pill.
Do you have any idea the kind of shallow, uninformed, willfully ignorant, arrogant, intellectual dishonest, and just plain nuttiness we on the pro-gun side have had to cope with here over the past several years? And it seems like it's the same people but with different usernames that we deal with because the same tired and simpleminded rhetoric is constantly repeated by all of them.
Go back and do some research on these threads whydoncha....
Okay, so let's pretend that we have no constitution nor human rights in general and are all mere serfs.
Please tell us what "sane gun control" is and what the results have historically been in the US.
In other words, you have no answer.
Just as I thought.....
straw man
noun
noun: strawman
a person compared to a straw image; a sham.
a sham argument set up to be defeated.
16 Jun 2015, 11:54 am
16 Jun 2015, 1:56 pm
16 Jun 2015, 2:13 pm
16 Jun 2015, 5:04 pm
Dox47 wrote:
As a side note, it's usually considered bad form and a waste of time to respond to the schizophrenic hobo shouting nonsense at you, so I'm going to display a similar form of discretion here.
Smiles and winks(;..I'll take that as a compliment coming from you..
Would love to meet you in REAL LIFE and have a word or two;
With or without word salad..haha!..
But this is the INTERNET wHere
whomever can become a legend
in their own mind online...
At least I admit to being
a poet who knows IT..
I run circles around you
all day; and YOU don't
even
feel it..
16 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm
Fugu wrote:
:P
It goes both ways. People don't want to converse with you because you come across as condescending yourself. Nobody even wants to have a rational conversation with you since you get under people's skin so much. You provoke people into attacking you often. I'm not saying they are right to attack you but it goes both ways.
You feel defensive because so many people disagree with you. The least you could do is admit the defensiveness. That would be intellectually honest at least.
Oh, take a pill.
Do you have any idea the kind of shallow, uninformed, willfully ignorant, arrogant, intellectual dishonest, and just plain nuttiness we on the pro-gun side have had to cope with here over the past several years? And it seems like it's the same people but with different usernames that we deal with because the same tired and simpleminded rhetoric is constantly repeated by all of them.
Go back and do some research on these threads whydoncha....perhaps it would help if the major agitator for change in this area(the NRA) wasn't just a puppet for the guns industry, and didn't vote against sane gun control laws.
Okay, so let's pretend that we have no constitution nor human rights in general and are all mere serfs.
Please tell us what "sane gun control" is and what the results have historically been in the US.yah, not going to bother with your lame strawman. try again chucklehead
In other words, you have no answer.
Just as I thought.....no answer to your fantasy scenario which has no bearing on reality? yah, you're right, i've no answer to your makebelieve scenario.
straw man
noun
noun: strawman
a person compared to a straw image; a sham.
a sham argument set up to be defeated.
Raptor wrote:
Fugu wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Fugu wrote:
Raptor wrote:
heavenlyabyss wrote:
Dox47 wrote:
As a side note, I'm fine with being called a nut if I am in turn allowed to use the appropriate terminology for people who have no idea what they're talking about and yet loudly proclaim their rightness and righteousness in the most condescending and obnoxious manner possible; I believe the technical term is as*holes.
It goes both ways. People don't want to converse with you because you come across as condescending yourself. Nobody even wants to have a rational conversation with you since you get under people's skin so much. You provoke people into attacking you often. I'm not saying they are right to attack you but it goes both ways.
You feel defensive because so many people disagree with you. The least you could do is admit the defensiveness. That would be intellectually honest at least.
Oh, take a pill.
Do you have any idea the kind of shallow, uninformed, willfully ignorant, arrogant, intellectual dishonest, and just plain nuttiness we on the pro-gun side have had to cope with here over the past several years? And it seems like it's the same people but with different usernames that we deal with because the same tired and simpleminded rhetoric is constantly repeated by all of them.
Go back and do some research on these threads whydoncha....
Okay, so let's pretend that we have no constitution nor human rights in general and are all mere serfs.
Please tell us what "sane gun control" is and what the results have historically been in the US.
In other words, you have no answer.
Just as I thought.....
straw man
noun
noun: strawman
a person compared to a straw image; a sham.
a sham argument set up to be defeated.
Look up the meaning of "cop out" while you're at it.
Hint: it's what you're doing here.
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Is Clark Kent a great representation of adult autism? |
01 Feb 2025, 10:32 am |
| I found some great fanart of Carl Gould from Arthur |
23 Jan 2025, 2:11 am |
