Personally, I believe homosexuality to be wrong. As most of the appropriate verses have been already discussed to death, I do not think that there is any need to display them again.
I do not beleive that hatred should be espoused. I beleive that homosexuals are more confused than anything. I do not see any reason why homosexuals could not make it to heaven, as repentance is the key.
I do not believe that homosexuals should be married to each other. Marriage is exclusive to a man and a woman. It has been so throughout history, and by its very definition within the English language. If there is a need to give legal and social condoning to same-sex relationships (which I do not think should happen, as there is no chance of reproduction), it should be given another name such as a civil union. Anything else is the government interfering with religion, which is a bridge best not crossed.
I attempt, as always, to be Voltairian in my views and communication. Homosexuals should have the right to discuss alternative theories regarding themselves. If anyone is able to actually convince me to change my opinion, I will take my hat off to them. However, what I find disturbing is the modern laws that prevent me from discussing my viewpoint. Now, it is called hate speach. I am not promoting hate, and have a right to express my own viewpoint. Thus, now only those who are espousing homosexuality as being natural &c are allowed to have a public opinion. For all their talk about being about loving and freedom of choice, they are actually practicing toltolitarianism.
claire333 wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
i meant it more as you were saying that good and bad there is subjective...besides making some people creeped out, how is it bad? it doesn't seem subjective at all unless you're irrational.
The rationality and irrationality of others is also quite subjective.
that's only at their insistence.