Page 13 of 26 [ 403 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 26  Next

greenblue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,896
Location: Home

19 Aug 2008, 7:36 pm

skafather84 wrote:
claire333 wrote:
philosopherBoi wrote:
In your opinion is homosexuality a bad thing??


Good and bad are purely subjective. What difference will the subjective opinions of others make in the way you live your life?



to varying degrees. my question is how can homosexuality be bad?

i mean if it's observed objectively...who does it hurt? what negative effect does it achieve for it to be viewed as wrong?

well, I believe it can't be observed entirely objectively, if we are talking about pure objectivity, then we should have to answer the question if rape is wrong and why, and answering objectively. I think I sound like AG saying this :oops: :P


_________________
?Everything is perfect in the universe - even your desire to improve it.?


Last edited by greenblue on 19 Aug 2008, 7:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

19 Aug 2008, 7:37 pm

claire333 wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
to varying degrees. my question is how can homosexuality be bad?

i mean if it's observed objectively...who does it hurt? what negative effect does it achieve for it to be viewed as wrong?


I do not perceive it to be bad. Therefore, I am not certain I could give a fully objective observation due to being biased by my own subjective opinion.

But what difference does it make anyway? If I say it is bad does that make it bad? If I say it is good does that make it good? Is my opinion going to change views or the way anyone lives their life?

The fact is, the Christians who think homosexuals are going to Hell are not going to make such judgements because they know that is their God's job and not for them to decide.

Everyone else is simply going to give the OP the confirmations he seems to be seeking.

I am just questioning what difference it really makes.


i meant it more as you were saying that good and bad there is subjective...besides making some people creeped out, how is it bad? it doesn't seem subjective at all unless you're irrational.

i didn't meant it to challenge you specifically...just more that i thought your way of approaching it was kinda dismissive of those who do deem it bad and they shouldn't get off so lightly.



claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

19 Aug 2008, 7:46 pm

skafather84 wrote:
i meant it more as you were saying that good and bad there is subjective...besides making some people creeped out, how is it bad? it doesn't seem subjective at all unless you're irrational.


The rationality and irrationality of others is also quite subjective.

skafather84 wrote:
i didn't meant it to challenge you specifically...just more that i thought your way of approaching it was kinda dismissive of those who do deem it bad and they shouldn't get off so lightly.


I did not take it as a challenge at all. You are correct in your perception of my being dismissive. I know the opinions of others is not going to change anyone's sexual orientation. So other than meerly seeking aproval, I cannot imagine a reason for seeking the opinions of others in such a matter.

I'm straight. Is that bad? Why do you think it is or is not bad?



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

19 Aug 2008, 8:03 pm

claire333 wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
i meant it more as you were saying that good and bad there is subjective...besides making some people creeped out, how is it bad? it doesn't seem subjective at all unless you're irrational.


The rationality and irrationality of others is also quite subjective.


that's only at their insistence.


claire333 wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
i didn't meant it to challenge you specifically...just more that i thought your way of approaching it was kinda dismissive of those who do deem it bad and they shouldn't get off so lightly.


I did not take it as a challenge at all. You are correct in your perception of my being dismissive. I know the opinions of others is not going to change anyone's sexual orientation. So other than meerly seeking aproval, I cannot imagine a reason for seeking the opinions of others in such a matter.

I'm straight. Is that bad? Why do you think it is or is not bad?


i meant dismissive of those who view a certain sexual orientation as being bad. you seemed to just sorta let them off the hook with the "it's subjective" thing.



claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

19 Aug 2008, 8:15 pm

skafather84 wrote:
i meant dismissive of those who view a certain sexual orientation as being bad. you seemed to just sorta let them off the hook with the "it's subjective" thing.


I guess in a way it would let them off the hook. Their opinion is equally as subjective as mine, and they are equally entitled to their opinion as I am. It's like that old saying...Opinions are like buttholes... :D



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

19 Aug 2008, 8:34 pm

claire333 wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
i meant dismissive of those who view a certain sexual orientation as being bad. you seemed to just sorta let them off the hook with the "it's subjective" thing.


I guess in a way it would let them off the hook. Their opinion is equally as subjective as mine, and they are equally entitled to their opinion as I am. It's like that old saying...Opinions are like buttholes... :D


yeah...they're like buttholes...put enough lube and you shove just about anything in there.



QuantumCowboy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 897
Location: (1/√2)|0> + (1/√2)|1>

19 Aug 2008, 10:02 pm

Personally, I believe homosexuality to be wrong. As most of the appropriate verses have been already discussed to death, I do not think that there is any need to display them again.

I do not beleive that hatred should be espoused. I beleive that homosexuals are more confused than anything. I do not see any reason why homosexuals could not make it to heaven, as repentance is the key.

I do not believe that homosexuals should be married to each other. Marriage is exclusive to a man and a woman. It has been so throughout history, and by its very definition within the English language. If there is a need to give legal and social condoning to same-sex relationships (which I do not think should happen, as there is no chance of reproduction), it should be given another name such as a civil union. Anything else is the government interfering with religion, which is a bridge best not crossed.

I attempt, as always, to be Voltairian in my views and communication. Homosexuals should have the right to discuss alternative theories regarding themselves. If anyone is able to actually convince me to change my opinion, I will take my hat off to them. However, what I find disturbing is the modern laws that prevent me from discussing my viewpoint. Now, it is called hate speach. I am not promoting hate, and have a right to express my own viewpoint. Thus, now only those who are espousing homosexuality as being natural &c are allowed to have a public opinion. For all their talk about being about loving and freedom of choice, they are actually practicing toltolitarianism. :chin:


_________________
The ket always seems to psi over its own indeterminacy.


Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

19 Aug 2008, 10:06 pm

so by your logic 2 men or 2 women can't get married because its said its a man and woman
then change it, seriously
before the bigot christians came homosexuality was widly accepted
look at rome
perfect example, god its pointless arguing with bigots



Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

19 Aug 2008, 10:07 pm

slowmutant wrote:
Kilroy wrote:
slowmutant wrote:
No growth is possible without change. :idea:


I am a bisexual-and refuse to try and change (which I can't I was born this way)
and as long as these people try to change me I refuse to accept what they say


When I say "change" I don't really mean your sexuality. Of course I realize you can't change that part of yourself.



I am fine I don't need change
I like who I am



corroonb
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,377
Location: Ireland

19 Aug 2008, 10:11 pm

Kilroy wrote:
so by your logic 2 men or 2 women can't get married because its said its a man and woman
then change it, seriously
before the bigot christians came homosexuality was widly accepted
look at rome
perfect example, god its pointless arguing with bigots


You are quite correct.

Why is homosexuality wrong? Who does it hurt? What evil does it create?



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

19 Aug 2008, 10:17 pm

QuantumCowboy wrote:
Personally, I believe homosexuality to be wrong. As most of the appropriate verses have been already discussed to death, I do not think that there is any need to display them again.

I do not beleive that hatred should be espoused. I beleive that homosexuals are more confused than anything. I do not see any reason why homosexuals could not make it to heaven, as repentance is the key.

I do not believe that homosexuals should be married to each other. Marriage is exclusive to a man and a woman. It has been so throughout history, and by its very definition within the English language. If there is a need to give legal and social condoning to same-sex relationships (which I do not think should happen, as there is no chance of reproduction), it should be given another name such as a civil union. Anything else is the government interfering with religion, which is a bridge best not crossed.

I attempt, as always, to be Voltairian in my views and communication. Homosexuals should have the right to discuss alternative theories regarding themselves. If anyone is able to actually convince me to change my opinion, I will take my hat off to them. However, what I find disturbing is the modern laws that prevent me from discussing my viewpoint. Now, it is called hate speach. I am not promoting hate, and have a right to express my own viewpoint. Thus, now only those who are espousing homosexuality as being natural &c are allowed to have a public opinion. For all their talk about being about loving and freedom of choice, they are actually practicing toltolitarianism. :chin:


skafather84 wrote:
claire333 wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
i meant it more as you were saying that good and bad there is subjective...besides making some people creeped out, how is it bad? it doesn't seem subjective at all unless you're irrational.


The rationality and irrationality of others is also quite subjective.


that's only at their insistence.



Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

19 Aug 2008, 10:18 pm

I don't understand why people are so damned offended
are they f*****g you??! !
I mean seriously how do they destroy moral values
the same people who say that say god loves everyone and everyone is equal
but like to leave out people they don't like



corroonb
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,377
Location: Ireland

19 Aug 2008, 10:19 pm

Kilroy wrote:
I don't understand why people are so damned offended
are they f***ing you??! !
I mean seriously how do they destroy moral values
the same people who say that say god loves everyone and everyone is equal
but like to leave out people they don't like



You are quite correct.

Why is homosexuality wrong? Who does it hurt? What evil does it create?



Fidget
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 919
Location: Illinois, US

19 Aug 2008, 10:20 pm

QuantumCowboy wrote:
same-sex relationships (which I do not think should happen, as there is no chance of reproduction)


So, what's your view on infertile women? Do they have the right to get married? Oh, I suppose that's not natural either, they're lying! Because God would never naturally make a creature not meant to reproduce right? :roll: I don't consider your viewpoint "hate speech" as you say, but I do consider it intolerance.



corroonb
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,377
Location: Ireland

19 Aug 2008, 10:22 pm

Fidget wrote:
QuantumCowboy wrote:
same-sex relationships (which I do not think should happen, as there is no chance of reproduction)


So, what's your view on infertile women? Do they have the right to get married? Oh, I suppose that's not natural either, they're lying! Because God would never naturally make a creature not meant to reproduce right? :roll: I don't consider your viewpoint "hate speech" as you say, but I do consider it intolerance.


You are quite correct.

Why is homosexuality wrong? Who does it hurt? What evil does it create?

I'll stop this when someone can answer my questions.

I need answers, damn it!

:lol:



Kilroy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,549
Location: Beyond the Void

19 Aug 2008, 10:27 pm

its not

no one

none