VegetableMan wrote:
If you really believe none of Biden's strikes have killed no civilians, then you are more out of touch than I imagined.
https://www.salon.com/2021/08/12/stop-t ... an-cities/You're pushing of pro war propanda, and the constant regurgitation of establishment talking points, is really disgusting!
You need to educate yourself about your own country. Regardless of who is in charge, the US has been both a national security state (started with a secret war on communism then moved to war on terror) and a military-industrial complex since the early 1950s.
It's actually a republican president, Dwight Eisenhower, who in 1961 warned "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist."
Eisenhower was worried about the costs of an arms race with the Soviet Union, and the resources it would take from other areas -- such as building hospitals and schools.
Every president has had to deal with military hawks in the US military-industrial complex who operate in league with the NSA and CIA in getting involved in foreign wars. What Eisenhower made clear is the office of president lost control of the military a long time ago.
Getting worked up over Biden and other democrats influence over the military is pointless and somewhat ignorant given they are no better or worse than republicans when it comes to US military actions overseas. It's actually getting quite irritating.
Doggone it, I'm sorry I irritated you. I know it's silly to worry about the biggest existential threat to the U.S. and the world at large, aside from climate change.
The only thing your post displays, other than you know to use Google, is that you're a virtue signaler who only pretends to care about human life when it suits your agenda.