Page 16 of 22 [ 350 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 22  Next


What is the primary reason for disapproval of homosexuality?
Religion 36%  36%  [ 40 ]
Fear that homosexuals will be attracted to YOU 3%  3%  [ 3 ]
Fear of disintegrating gender roles 10%  10%  [ 11 ]
Male fear of gay anal rape 5%  5%  [ 5 ]
Homosexual intercourse cannot produce children 4%  4%  [ 4 ]
It just icks people out 18%  18%  [ 20 ]
It defies social norms 10%  10%  [ 11 ]
Other (please explain below) 15%  15%  [ 16 ]
Total votes : 110

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Jan 2012, 12:13 pm

pandabear wrote:

If you read Xenophon's Anabasis, you'll find that Greek soldiers would often capture and keep alive for themselves boys.


Quite so. Those Greeks guys just loved young male tooshy so.

ruveyn



The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

06 Jan 2012, 2:23 pm

Well it's not natural! :oops:

And it looks like it would be yucky! :oops:



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

06 Jan 2012, 3:22 pm

Not nearly half so yucky as that things that heterosexuals do. (shudder)


_________________
--James


Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

06 Jan 2012, 4:48 pm

I would say homosexual sex is as yucky as heterosexual sex (which is by itself quite yucky and the only reason it doesn't seem so is that the brain gets disabled by hormones)


_________________
.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

06 Jan 2012, 6:40 pm

Vexcalibur wrote:
I would say homosexual sex is as yucky as heterosexual sex (which is by itself quite yucky and the only reason it doesn't seem so is that the brain gets disabled by hormones)


Also, the heterosexual act can produce children. The homosexual act cannot.

ruveyn



The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

07 Jan 2012, 12:27 am

Vexcalibur wrote:
I would say homosexual sex is as yucky as heterosexual sex (which is by itself quite yucky and the only reason it doesn't seem so is that the brain gets disabled by hormones)


Actually this is not the case. Men are naturally disgusting creatures. The combination of the two is a bit like a scat fetish.



Oodain
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,

07 Jan 2012, 7:37 am

The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
I would say homosexual sex is as yucky as heterosexual sex (which is by itself quite yucky and the only reason it doesn't seem so is that the brain gets disabled by hormones)


Actually this is not the case. Men are naturally disgusting creatures. The combination of the two is a bit like a scat fetish.


all is in the eye of the beholder,

sex is ansty and people trying to generalise a sex nastier.


_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//

the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.


WilliamWDelaney
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

07 Jan 2012, 9:42 am

The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
I would say homosexual sex is as yucky as heterosexual sex (which is by itself quite yucky and the only reason it doesn't seem so is that the brain gets disabled by hormones)


Actually this is not the case. Men are naturally disgusting creatures.
And do you ever hear men talking in this way about women? Normally, they try to be complimentary, which is one of the reasons that I find their personalities to be more appealing. I find that women, once you start talking to them, can be offensively spiteful, shallow, and petty. Furthermore, it is unusual for them not to be offensively sexist: all of them seem to think that you are trying to either rape or rob them. I have had a number of skittish and stupid women send the cops after me because they felt I was "dangerous" or "on drugs."

However, whereas all of the problems that I have had with men seem to arise from homophobia and aggression, all of the problems I have ever had with women seem to arise from sexist bigotry and skittishness. I am not sure which of these is worse.

Quote:
The combination of the two is a bit like a scat fetish.
However, I have no difficulty believing that a person of either sex who represents both failings is utterly useless to society.

Oodain wrote:
all is in the eye of the beholder,
In fact, an easy way to understand it is to think of it in terms of what gives you a favorable body image. Regal or aristocratic features convey a sense of wealth and make one look...and feel...self-assured. An overly "chiseled" abdominal area is not nearly as attractive as it's cracked up to be and makes you feel like a freak if you actually have it, but the muscles should be visible, mobile and solid to the touch, with a somewhat burnished, rather than shiny, cast. Some body hair in the right areas makes you feel a bit rakish, but it should be plush and soft to the touch: consider putting a very small application of conditioner on it...not too much. In general, features that make men attractive are those that convey a sense of power and authority, and they look better if their features are accented rather than diminished.

Although men are not supposed to be "pretty," I think it's notable that Americans spend considerably more time watching football than they do watching beauty pageants. The appeal in the male body is in its brute...or more subtle...power. It always has been, and it always will be. To some people, this makes them beautiful.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

07 Jan 2012, 10:13 am

ruveyn wrote:
Vexcalibur wrote:
I would say homosexual sex is as yucky as heterosexual sex (which is by itself quite yucky and the only reason it doesn't seem so is that the brain gets disabled by hormones)


Also, the heterosexual act can produce children. The homosexual act cannot.

ruveyn


This would be an argument for homosexual coitus, if the coitus is purely intended for recreational purposes, and not procreational purposes.



The_Perfect_Storm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Sep 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,289

07 Jan 2012, 11:18 am

WilliamWDelaney wrote:
The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
Quote:
The combination of the two is a bit like a scat fetish.
However, I have no difficulty believing that a person of either sex who represents both failings is utterly useless to society.


Lol. I'm not even skittish :roll:



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,995
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

07 Jan 2012, 11:24 am

I don't really see the big deal, why should it matter to anyone else if someones homosexual? People should just live and let live when it comes to things like that. As for the poll I think those are all reasons I've heard as to why people disapprove of homosexuality but it makes no sense to me.


_________________
We won't go back.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

07 Jan 2012, 12:40 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
I don't really see the big deal, why should it matter to anyone else if someones homosexual? People should just live and let live when it comes to things like that. As for the poll I think those are all reasons I've heard as to why people disapprove of homosexuality but it makes no sense to me.


People's sex-lives insofar as they are based on consenting relations and do not involve the abuse of children should be quiet and private.

ruveyn



Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,995
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

07 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
I don't really see the big deal, why should it matter to anyone else if someones homosexual? People should just live and let live when it comes to things like that. As for the poll I think those are all reasons I've heard as to why people disapprove of homosexuality but it makes no sense to me.


People's sex-lives insofar as they are based on consenting relations and do not involve the abuse of children should be quiet and private.

ruveyn


Because I'm totally chill with non-consenting relations that involve abuse of children don't you know. :roll:


_________________
We won't go back.


peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

07 Jan 2012, 1:01 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
I don't really see the big deal, why should it matter to anyone else if someones homosexual? People should just live and let live when it comes to things like that. As for the poll I think those are all reasons I've heard as to why people disapprove of homosexuality but it makes no sense to me.


People's sex-lives insofar as they are based on consenting relations and do not involve the abuse of children should be quiet and private.

ruveyn


isn't this a rather victorian attitude?


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith


WilliamWDelaney
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,201

07 Jan 2012, 2:28 pm

The_Perfect_Storm wrote:
And it looks like it would be yucky! :oops:
Prissiness without grace is first-kin to belligerence without honor. Both are unattractive traits in anybody.

My grandmother is just about as prudish as a Southern Baptist grandmother can be, but she also has the tact and decency to be tolerant toward things she doesn't necessarily agree with. That's what sets her apart from the kinds of offensive people who think they have a right to spit on or destroy anything they don't understand. She has class, which has always been a rare trait, now all the more-so.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

07 Jan 2012, 3:44 pm

peebo wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
I don't really see the big deal, why should it matter to anyone else if someones homosexual? People should just live and let live when it comes to things like that. As for the poll I think those are all reasons I've heard as to why people disapprove of homosexuality but it makes no sense to me.


People's sex-lives insofar as they are based on consenting relations and do not involve the abuse of children should be quiet and private.

ruveyn


isn't this a rather victorian attitude?


Not particularly. The right of privacy is one of the prime features of a civilized order. Also people should not be foisting aspects of their private lives on others. It is all a matter of Good Manners. Polite people do not disturb others.

ruveyn