Guns as the great equalizer
he says, in a thread titled "guns as the great equalizer"
Should it really be necessary to write a dissertation explaining the meaning of the thread?
yah, because things like batons,
An ASP baton can be useful at times if you know how to use one
Next....
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
A compact easy to carry taser only fires one shot. Even the ones that carry two or three shots are considerably bulkier. The range is very limited. What if you have multiple opponents or the device malfunctions?
With stun guns you have to make physical contact in order to even begin to make the thing work..
Oh, an no; you won't be taking a gun from even a relatively skilled practitioner with the handgun even at contact range. It's really not like in Hollywood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmEgevqarkw
woah, those guys must be movie stars..wait, no they're not, you're just wrong. surprise!
Read again the "relatively skilled practitioner" thingy that I wrote. Only a 'tard would hold a gun to someone's head.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
he says, in a thread titled "guns as the great equalizer"
Should it really be necessary to write a dissertation explaining the meaning of the thread?
yah, because things like batons,
An ASP baton can be useful at times if you know how to use one
Next....
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
A compact easy to carry taser only fires one shot. Even the ones that carry two or three shots are considerably bulkier. The range is very limited. What if you have multiple opponents or the device malfunctions?
With stun guns you have to make physical contact in order to even begin to make the thing work..
Oh, an no; you won't be taking a gun from even a relatively skilled practitioner with the handgun even at contact range. It's really not like in Hollywood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmEgevqarkw
woah, those guys must be movie stars..wait, no they're not, you're just wrong. surprise!
Read again the "relatively skilled practitioner" thingy that I wrote. Only a 'tard would hold a gun to someone's head.
yah, because things like batons,
An ASP baton can be useful at times if you know how to use one
Next....
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
that was more an option for home defense, but what's stopping you from transporting it with you in your car?
Cars transport us on the road. We don't drive them on sidewalks, paths, into malls, stores, etc...
Kinda hard to break a carjacking attempt with a bat. Most cars arent big enough to get a good swing in. A jab at best which is not what a bat is best for.
With stun guns you have to make physical contact in order to even begin to make the thing work..
Maybe for you.....
This gets back to knowing something about modern tactics.
Oh, an no; you won't be taking a gun from even a relatively skilled practitioner with the handgun even at contact range. It's really not like in Hollywood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmEgevqarkw
woah, those guys must be movie stars..wait, no they're not, you're just wrong. surprise!
Read again the "relatively skilled practitioner" thingy that I wrote. Only a 'tard would hold a gun to someone's head.[/quote]
Ah, the suicide argument. Suicide is still self-inflicted and in no way an honest crime statistic.
It's as silly as saying that if someone has a cigarette lighter they're more likely to immolate themselves.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
Ah, the suicide argument. Suicide is still self-inflicted and in no way an honest crime statistic.
It's as silly as saying that if someone has a cigarette lighter they're more likely to immolate themselves.
implying that cigarette lighters were designed to kill is silly, good point.
guns however, are designed to kill. being depressed and having easy access to a 1step method of ending your own life is a deadly combo
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/01/2 ... cide-risk/
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firea ... p-and-use/
e: deleted the sea of quotes
Ah, the suicide argument. Suicide is still self-inflicted and in no way an honest crime statistic.
It's as silly as saying that if someone has a cigarette lighter they're more likely to immolate themselves.
implying that cigarette lighters were designed to kill is silly, good point.
guns however, are designed to kill. being depressed and having easy access to a 1step method of ending your own life is a deadly combo
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/01/2 ... cide-risk/
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firea ... p-and-use/
e: deleted the sea of quotes
I'll assume you're also in favor of banning knifes, razors, pointy objects etc? all can be a 1 step method to ending your life just as guns can/ but I assume you use all those so no don't ban the stuff you like and use just the stuff others use but you don't thats ok.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Ah, the suicide argument. Suicide is still self-inflicted and in no way an honest crime statistic.
It's as silly as saying that if someone has a cigarette lighter they're more likely to immolate themselves.
implying that cigarette lighters were designed to kill is silly, good point.
guns however, are designed to kill. being depressed and having easy access to a 1step method of ending your own life is a deadly combo
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/01/2 ... cide-risk/
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firea ... p-and-use/
e: deleted the sea of quotes
"A deadly COMBO"
Or a 'shy' racist kid who doesn't like black folks;
'Brave enough' to shoot 9 innocents down in a church;
I don't suspect to see that thread here; I wonder
WHY; Guns CAN surely be disgusting
no matter who
believes what.
Yes, a timely
issue; YES...
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI
Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !
http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick
To be fair, blacks in the US are probably a million times more likely to be a victim of another black or brown street criminal compared to a white spree killer.
9 killed is probably close to one active weekend in Chicago for black on black violence.
Ah, the suicide argument. Suicide is still self-inflicted and in no way an honest crime statistic.
It's as silly as saying that if someone has a cigarette lighter they're more likely to immolate themselves.
implying that cigarette lighters were designed to kill is silly, good point.
guns however, are designed to kill.
Guns launch projectiles to put holes in things. Some were specifically designed for target shooting, some for hunting, and some for killing people. I think we've already been over this.
Does having a cigarette lighter cause arson? Why not? It's a flame producing device so anyone having one must be a wannabe arsonist and/or a pyromaniac.
being depressed and having easy access to a 1step method of ending your own life is a deadly combo.
Anyone that depressed is going to off themselves sooner or later. I'm not going to off myself so it's not my problem.
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
So you want black people to kill themselves is what you're saying.
From these posts of yours in this very same thread it would certainly seem so, with guns being more likely to be use for suicide as you say....
Hmmmm.......
![chin :chin:](./images/smilies/chin.gif)
_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson
To be fair, blacks in the US are probably a million times more likely to be a victim of another black or brown street criminal compared to a white spree killer.
9 killed is probably close to one active weekend in Chicago for black on black violence.
Indeed ( http://www.infowars.com/black-crime-fac ... talk-about ). And, because I have come to expect immediate dismissal of certain news reports like this one by some, I ask only that they try to focus on the statistical links embedded in the report, 'k?
_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)
Automobiles kill more people than guns.
Medical error kills twice as many as autos.
Getting rid of guns will not stop murder or suicide.
Even our famous Militarized Police, almost all have never drawn their weapon on duty. A lot less have fired it, less still hit anyone, and fewer still killed someone.
America has more than one gun per person, compared, all deaths by firearms is a very small number.
Smaller yet, senseless mass murder. It is not a new thing, and The Subway shooting, Shipyard, Fort Hood, were not done by whites with bad haircuts. Richard Speck, Desalvo, the Hillside Strangler, Ted Bundy, had no political agenda.
Mental illness? One in seven gets committed, two more treated as out patients. America is a bunch of nut case gun owners, who never commit crime, or kill anyone.
Overall risk? A young white woman texting while driving is the greatest risk to your life. Next would be her talking on the phone, then putting on makeup.
Autos kill about a hundred a day. Police kill about one. Just in New Orleans, or other cities, Black people kill one Black person per day.
Mass shooters happen about once a year. Overall, they kill one a month.
On the other side mass gun ownership prevents a lot of crime from even thinking of it.
Medical error kills twice as many as autos.
Getting rid of guns will not stop murder or suicide.
Even our famous Militarized Police, almost all have never drawn their weapon on duty. A lot less have fired it, less still hit anyone, and fewer still killed someone.
America has more than one gun per person, compared, all deaths by firearms is a very small number.
Smaller yet, senseless mass murder. It is not a new thing, and The Subway shooting, Shipyard, Fort Hood, were not done by whites with bad haircuts. Richard Speck, Desalvo, the Hillside Strangler, Ted Bundy, had no political agenda.
Mental illness? One in seven gets committed, two more treated as out patients. America is a bunch of nut case gun owners, who never commit crime, or kill anyone.
Overall risk? A young white woman texting while driving is the greatest risk to your life. Next would be her talking on the phone, then putting on makeup.
Autos kill about a hundred a day. Police kill about one. Just in New Orleans, or other cities, Black people kill one Black person per day.
Mass shooters happen about once a year. Overall, they kill one a month.
On the other side mass gun ownership prevents a lot of crime from even thinking of it.
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ardpatr.pdf
there have been 7,427 police homicides from 2003-09/2011(~15 a week[figure 1, page 18)), so 'police kill just one' is plainly false.
To be fair, blacks in the US are probably a million times more likely to be a victim of another black or brown street criminal compared to a white spree killer.
9 killed is probably close to one active weekend in Chicago for black on black violence.
Indeed ( http://www.infowars.com/black-crime-fac ... talk-about ). And, because I have come to expect immediate dismissal of certain news reports like this one by some, I ask only that they try to focus on the statistical links embedded in the report, 'k?
setting aside the fact that you're posting infowars unironically(lolol), that whole article is "durrr black disenfranchisement? whats that"
here's a less biased source: http://www.timwise.org/2013/08/race-cri ... ogus-data/
First, according to the 2008 data Williams relied on (see Table 42), which is the most recent comprehensive data published by the Justice Department on violent crime victimizations, that year there were approximately 3.6 million violent crimes involving a single-offender.
These crimes include assault, both simple and aggravated (mostly simple), robbery, and sexual assault or rape. Of those 3.6 million violent crimes, whites committed 2.1 million of them (58.4%) while blacks committed about 830,000 (22.8%) About 442,000 (or 12%) involved perpetrators whose race was not known to the victim.
Thus, for crimes where the race of the perpetrator was known to the victims (about 3.2 million crimes), whites would have committed about 66 percent (two-thirds) and blacks about 26 percent (one-fourth).
If we assume the same rough racial distribution for crimes where the perpetrator’s race was not known as for crimes where the offender race was known (a reasonable guess), this would mean that whites committed an additional 300,000 crimes, roughly, while blacks would have committed an additional 115,000.
In all, this would mean that in 2008, whites committed roughly 2.4 million single offender violent crimes, while blacks would have committed around 950,000.
e: added spacing for legibility
Setting aside the statement's many spelling, grammar and style errors, it is an example of an ad hominem attack. This is especially egregious when I accounted for the source and emphasized the embedded research links.
_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Is Clark Kent a great representation of adult autism? |
01 Feb 2025, 10:32 am |
I found some great fanart of Carl Gould from Arthur |
23 Jan 2025, 2:11 am |