cyberdad wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
And BLM and “woke” ideologies etc is being funded and promoted by cooperations. Yes consumers can elect to hurt companies by electing to not spend money. Voters can choose to not vote Republican.
Isn't this a chicken-egg situation though? corporations never started this type of thing out of the goodness of their hearts.
For example, H&M clothing spent millions on promoting "re-wearing" as a way of reducing carbon footprints and exploiting sweatshops. But the ad campaign didn't make sense since they are major clothing firm and they were shooting themselves in the foot by telling potential customers to recycle clothes rather than spend their money in their stores??
Like petrol companies companies promoting renewable energy. I'll pose the question, why would they do this?
In getting caught up in the granular issues the big picture is being missed. We have entered a new "zeitgeist" like back in the 1960s and in the 1980s where now global issues that have transnational importance are eroding silly little beliefs that people want to cling onto like a dirty old security blanket. There are bigger fish to fry.
Companies want to be good corporate citizens of the world. The republican party are appealing to their confused supporters pretending they can turn back to the clock to the "good old days". They are selling something they can't deliver.
Money is always the number 1 consideration with companies. Decisions on how to make the most money are made by humans. A lot of the decision makers at these companies did learn “woke” or proto “woke” ideologies in college so the probably believe in it in some way. Most of the younger employees are products of the lefty education system and are demanding these things. In order to keep thier employees from rebelling they feel they have to give in.
Everybody saw the murder of George Floyd over and over again. NT “hive mind” and emotionalism created a universal demand to do something NOW.
I believe the 60s were a time of major social changes and now is a time of revolutionary change. But the 80s? Technological change yes but social and political retrenchment. A lot of the 60s changes were rolled back.
Colorblindness as a goal, not wanting to cancel a person based on a 10 year old bad tweet are not silky little beliefs.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman