EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
The difference is, there are peaceful Anti-Trump protesters, then there are anarchists who think they can cure any problem with violence and anarchy. There is a clear distinction.
I haven't seen much that looked all that peaceful. Even if there isn't outright vandalism and psychical stuff, there's lots of shouting and general commotion. They really plagued the airports, made things really difficult on everyone traveling. Total public nuisance stuff.
Kraichgauer wrote:
And anything on the internet has as much credibility as something written on the inside of a men's room stall.
Anything? Like the ban, like the judge putting a stay on the ban etc? I'm talking about news feeds. I'm not stupid you know. Here:
Donald Trump protesters in Houston march toward Super Bowl Live downtown - Houston Chronicle
http://www.chron.com/houston/article/Do ... 908735.phpPlenty of others.
I suppose you would complain about the civil rights marches in the sixties,all that shouting and commotion,people getting sprayed by hoses,bitten by dogs,beat down by cops.
I've seen footage of plenty of peaceful people marching,maybe you should stop googling violent protests.
Nothing wrong with protesting at airports,I beleive that was done before when the air traffic controllers went on strike.Nothing wrong with peaceful marches at the Super Bowl,not like it's sacred ground.
None of these actions are actually new,people have done this before.Yet you act like its the first time you have ever seen civil unrest.Oh yeah,it probably is.
_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi