RandyG wrote:
simon_says wrote:
There is no question that a cleaning lady would have access to subsidies for exchange insurance. Probably very good subsidies. She's very likely the person you are complaining about getting "free" things even though it won't be entirely free.
She could have been receiving government assistance a long time ago. Certainly six years ago, when her husband died, and probably before that. What I doubt you can understand is: she doesn't
want it. She has been providing for her family, herself, very nicely by working hard and living frugally. Now she must either struggle to find money for the mandatory insurance, or be forced to accept what she will regard as alms. The ACA is taking away her choices and her dignity. Shame on anyone who thinks this is a good thing.
If Obamacare were really going to magically lower everyone's rates and improve everyone's coverage, as supporters claim, it could be implemented on a 100% voluntary basis, and after a year or two we doubters would be lining up to sign on as well. The fact that it has to be enforced at gunpoint proves that it's just another power-grabbing, redistributionist, vote-buying scheme.
A) I don't believe for one minute that this woman exists or believes as you say. No mother would be happy with uninsured kids. Maybe a mentally ill one.
B) Those who really can't afford it are exempt. It can't cost more than 8% of income. If she gets subsidies it will be much, much less.
C) Insurance is a shared risk pool. If you don't include low risk people the rates climb. If car insurance was just bought by 18-25 year olds it would be unaffordable.
D) That you don't even understand the arguments of the other side at this late stage says much more about you than Obamacare.
E) The shame is all yours though you might not understand why.
Quote:
We have a friend, a widow, who supports her three children by working as a cleaning lady; she already couldn't afford insurance at pre-ACA rates, but now has to somehow either buy even more expensive insurance or pay a hefty fine for not being able to afford it.
That quote is your previous claim. Don't move the goalposts on me and expect me not to notice.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
You've got the wrong guy Hoss.