ruveyn wrote:
I suppose a very bad government can be worse than no government at all. In any case would you choose to live in Somalia as it is now? If not, why not? A slightly obnoxious government that interferes with one's personal life might be better than life in a shooting galery.
No, I wouldn't choose to live in Somalia as it is right now, and for essentially the same reasons why I am likely to stay out of Africa. Somalia, like most African countries, is relatively poor, and has governance that is inferior to that of the US.
Quote:
The problem with Somalia is the property rights are not protected, so no one is going to invest large sums of money into Somolia to turn it into a half way civilized industrial society. Life in Somolia will be be economically marginal for the foreseeable future.
Which is different how than other parts of Africa? Additionally, hasn't there already been investment into Somalia?
http://www.peterleeson.com/Better_Off_Stateless.pdf"A large part of this progress has been in telecommunications. Local providers have joined forces with
multinationals like Sprint, ITT and Telenor to provide cheaper, higher quality, and more
extensive coverage than ever before (UNDP 2001: 107). In fact, Somalia boasts the cheapest,
clearest cell phone calls on the continent (The Economist 2005)." (pg 20)
"And according to the UN, “In Hargeisa, Mogadishu, and Bosasso, investments in light manufacturing have expanded, indicating local investor confidence in the economy and local security” (UNDP 2001: 39)." (pg 21)
"The financial sector is not alone to attract attention from multinational businesses. Others
have also found stateless Somalia an attractive place to invest. Dole Fruit, for instance, has
invested in Somalia. General Motors’ Kenya subsidiary has as well. Total Oil Company now
operates in Somaliland, and the BBC has forged a formal affiliation with one of Somalia’s
emergent media companies. Several international companies have expressed interest in investing
in Somalia’s energy industry, and numerous fishing fleets from Europe and Asia have reached
agreements for commercial fishing in Puntland (Little 2003: 166-167)." (pg 24)
Quote:
In theory an anarchistic society could evolve into a minimalist state, with a minimal government (or the operating equivalent thereof). But this has not happened in Somolia nor is it likely to. The same could be said of Haiti which is another sh*t pile.
ruveyn
Well.... ok? So, in theory the anarchist could be right, therefore one cannot be an anarchist?