Orwell wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
And I am very bright. I am smarter than 95 percent of the human species now alive.
You keep bragging about this. Why? This claim is, I presume, based upon some IQ test.
To put into perspective, ruveyn: If we are to trust IQ tests as a valid measure of intelligence (I do not) then it would be possible to create a group of people larger than the population of Indonesia, all of whom are smarter than you and dumber than me (ie, roughly 4% of the world population). And yet there are still hordes of people next to whom I am a complete moron. Being smarter than this or that percentage of the general population is meaningless, as is the concept of trying to quantify and objectively compare intelligence in the first place.
That 4% is roughly 260 million people. More than 1/4 billion. And still many more who are smarter yet. That puts my ego in its place, but does it do so for ruveyn? And I test higher than he does(but still short of orwell).
I too think IQ tests are banal and short sighted.
The people I choose as friends - such as orwell - are intelligent in ways that I am not. My personal growth depends on broadening my view points. I do not always agree with their positions, but what I gain from interaction with them is worldliness and increased empathy.
When I meet someone that has no empathy for others, not even a cognitive sort of empathy, I see that the only thing I will learn from them is closed mindedness. I do not ruminate very deeply on their proffered wisdom. Their sermon might as well be solitary, ruveyn.
_________________
davidred wrote...
I installed Ubuntu once and it completely destroyed my paying relationship with Microsoft.