Sand wrote:
Was this a result of my comment on the expression of the meaning of life in words as not possible? How was that bitter? It was merely logical. If the statement is to be taken seriously I merely pointed out the logical conclusion. You have a strange sense of what is bitter.
No, I would say that the combination of all of the following statements appear to express a negative outlook on things in general:
Sand wrote:
Some people enjoy destroying others
While true, it's also true that "some people enjoy helping others", but you left this fact out and kept just the inverse. "Some" people do all sorts of things, positive AND negative, yet you focus on the negative.
Sand wrote:
I see no Lord and I do not chase mirages.
Sand wrote:
Attempt at what? Don't let yourself be suckered by foolish nonsense.
Comparing someone's beliefs to "chasing mirages" and "foolish nonsense" is quite negative. I am an agnostic, I see no proof that there is or is not a God or gods, but I don't discount the possibility because I see no evidence that there is not either. But just because I don't believe in a God or gods doesn't mean that I work actively to insult those beliefs.
Sand wrote:
Like moderate murder and moderate rape and moderate pedophilia, perhaps?
It is obvious that there are certain things which are not "permissible in moderation". I'm sure the poster you were responding to knew that. He was making a generalization to prove the opposite, that EXCESS in almost anything is bad.
Sand wrote:
this thread is totally useless.
And this is pretty much the capper. Why participate in a thread that you think is useless, other than just to ridicule and insult beliefs other than your own?