01001011 wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
Asmodeus wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
Asmodeus wrote:
I do not tend to believe things without evidence, and so do not entertain the concept of undetectable overlords.
Without evidence? OK... So how did you come to that conclusion?
By realising there isn't any evidence of undetectable overlords other than anecdotal evidence that can be entirely explained to be normal psychological phenomena.
I see. And what evidence do you have of psychological phenomena?
A lot. We have well documented observation on people with mental illness, cult members, etc.
Indeed? Well documented observation?
Then you ought to reconsider your position. These "undetectable overlords" you speak of keep showing up in documents throughout the present as well as the ancient world. They are widely distributed, in fact, and you may recognize some of them: The Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Koran, Confucian proverbs, the teachings of Buddha, the Vedas. Many religions that no longer enjoy widespread recognition are well-documented, such as the various Greek and Roman cults and their associated mythologies, though in written form are much less reliable than Judeo-Christian texts. There are numerous texts on New Age, Wicca, neo-paganism, and so forth, even though these religions are much less organized.
Not only are these ideas widely disseminated, they are also widely BELIEVED. And those beliefs are also observed and well-documented in practice. They, in fact, appear to be "normal psychological phenomena."