Orwell wrote:
I used the term a couple times, but I wouldn't characterize my usage of it as "early and often." I ignored the Tea Party movement at the beginning, and only referred to them as Teabaggers on a handful of occasions.
To answer your criticisms of MP, yes he does use ideologically charged terminology and labels on occasion, but that's not really out of place or out of line in a political forum. Everyone does the same to some extent or other.
Apologies for any appearance of misconstruing you Orwell, like I said I was relying on memory and readily concede that mine is pretty good but far from perfect. I was certainly among those facepalming when early on some clearly culturally naive Tea Partiers described themselves as teabaggers, though I thought that far too much was made of it in the mainstream media. It was funny for a minute, but then very quickly took on a nasty and more partisan edge.
As for Master P, my charges aren't that he's unique in his use of loaded terms and labels, but that he does so extensively and to the detriment of his rhetorical strength. I'm not trying to put him down or discredit him in some way, I'm trying to offer him some constructive criticism on what I see as a major weakness in his argumentative style. You may or may not recall that I once spent the several pages of a thread trying to make the same point about sensationalism to Xenon13 concerning the use of DU munitions while beating back a misunderstanding with Sand at the same time, so it's not like I'm singling just him out, though I do think he's a primary offender right at the moment.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez