What Makes People Become Libertarians?
WilliamWDelaney wrote:
The libertarian unknowingly laps up the benefits of other people's labors but complains loudly when asked to make his own contribution.
Most libertarians are opposed to governmental intervention, thus they oppose making their own contribution when something is bad.
Quote:
The libertarian is a selfish and petty sort of person.
Just so long as you aren't attacking my character.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23259/2325942d5f956e23d0b663fc36737595f5c951a3" alt="Razz :P"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23259/2325942d5f956e23d0b663fc36737595f5c951a3" alt="Razz :P"
Quote:
Libertarianism is a false god worshipped by self-centered, self-righteous, narcissistic, arrogant jerks.
And here I thought it was a political ideology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23259/2325942d5f956e23d0b663fc36737595f5c951a3" alt="Razz :P"
Quote:
In short, I deeply hate libertarians and believe they have almost no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
Man, I really feel the warmth.
Quote:
And making believe that misrepresentations of the so-called "founders" of our country doesn't help my opinion of them. They were politicians like any other, and most people are completely and totally wrong about them in every possible respect. Furthermore, their over-emphasis on Wealth of Nations makes them look not only stupid but ignorant, and it also proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that they have never read the damn book and don't really care what's actually in it. Their misrepresentations of the Communist Manifesto are further proof of their lack of literacy.
Would the contents of any of these books, or of the ideas of any of these people, matter?? Ideologies that solely look backwards are dead anyway. Frankly, the Wealth of Nations isn't a fun read, and the only value I can see it having is as an early reference to the Invisible Hand, but more explicitly libertarian references exist for use.
That being said..... saying "some libertarians misrepresent certain books" doesn't prove anything about the ideology.
Quote:
The libertarian is a pompous, stupid, pretentious know-nothing donkey who has probably received an expensive education but has absolutely failed to ever take any intellectual initiative. He is final proof that it is an absolute waste of money to try to educate people who were apparently born to be outright morons good for nothing really except screwing the caps onto bottles or some clerical equivalent thereof.
Well, so long as I am stupid and know-nothing, I suppose I have nothing more I really need to say, do I?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23259/2325942d5f956e23d0b663fc36737595f5c951a3" alt="Razz :P"
In any case, do you actually have a substantive remark? I only ask because while your vehemence is clear, this is entirely a rant lacking in all depth and meaning. Literally everything stated was just an insult, without a real criticism of the ideology. Now, one could argue that the ideology is entirely a false screen, however, even too many academics have libertarian views to justify being so dismissive. I'd almost have to suspect that libertarian tendencies are considered more intellectually justifiable than conservative ones.
WilliamWDelaney wrote:
Oh, and another thing that makes me honestly want to strangle libertarians is that they invariably believe that anyone who is not sold on their crap is a "socialist." Yes, I have to say that this is what make me hate libertarians the most.
I think your problem is actually just talking to dogmatic morons. I mean.... seriously, Republicans often sell the same kind of bs in terms of how democrats are "socialist" even though this is just nonsense given that both parties accept a good amount of market action.
That being said, you really can't blame EVERYBODY because a few people are outspoken morons. After all, while it is true that even on this forum, we have idiotic libertarians, it isn't as if every libertarian here is a buffoon.
sartresue
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df89e/df89efd598b1b2bb0673455105795a26319a7761" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Age: 70
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,313
Location: The Castle of Shock and Awe-tism
LibertarianAS wrote:
so basically libertarianism is about LOGIC and FACTS and not about EMOTIONS
interesting
interesting
Just the facts and logic topic
The artist Chester Brown and his Porn for It comic book advocating paid sex comes to mind as the essence of libertarianism.
May his tribe not increase, even if he got any of those (female) protitutes pregnant with little Chesters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66a22/66a22f7ccac6a249c09e2d83c26465aa37fb0c13" alt="Laughing :lol:"
_________________
Radiant Aspergian
Awe-Tistic Whirlwind
Phuture Phounder of the Philosophy Phactory
NOT a believer of Mystic Woo-Woo
WilliamWDelaney wrote:
Just reflecting my experiences here in the real world with the illiterate dolts out there who call themselves "libertarians," and quite frankly the responses I have gotten here haven't really done much to improve my outlook.
Ok, that's nice. Don't really care. My goal in life has never been to "improve your outlook". Besides, it is not the right thread to do that anyway, you'd really be better off with a thread more directly oriented towards the criticism of political ideology in order to do something like that. My experience is that there are nutjobs and there are sane people, and nutjobs often are louder than sane people.
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
WilliamWDelaney wrote:
Oh, and another thing that makes me honestly want to strangle libertarians is that they invariably believe that anyone who is not sold on their crap is a "socialist." Yes, I have to say that this is what make me hate libertarians the most.
I think your problem is actually just talking to dogmatic morons. I mean.... seriously, Republicans often sell the same kind of bs in terms of how democrats are "socialist" even though this is just nonsense given that both parties accept a good amount of market action.
That being said, you really can't blame EVERYBODY because a few people are outspoken morons. After all, while it is true that even on this forum, we have idiotic libertarians, it isn't as if every libertarian here is a buffoon.
Quite frankly, my views on economics are primarily thus:
1) I don't have a perfect understanding of the true complexities of economics;
2) The system that we have can be cranky and cumbersome, but it seems to work pretty well largely;
3) I am reflexively distrustful of someone who presents a sketchy and simple-minded ideology and attempts to represent it as a complete and tested economic system;
4) I am also automatically against any idea that is based on the aesthetic attractiveness of the idea itself rather than what it can do for us here in the real world. I am a nuts and bolts kind of guy.
Last edited by WilliamWDelaney on 02 May 2011, 12:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
WilliamWDelaney wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
WilliamWDelaney wrote:
Oh, and another thing that makes me honestly want to strangle libertarians is that they invariably believe that anyone who is not sold on their crap is a "socialist." Yes, I have to say that this is what make me hate libertarians the most.
I think your problem is actually just talking to dogmatic morons. I mean.... seriously, Republicans often sell the same kind of bs in terms of how democrats are "socialist" even though this is just nonsense given that both parties accept a good amount of market action.
That being said, you really can't blame EVERYBODY because a few people are outspoken morons. After all, while it is true that even on this forum, we have idiotic libertarians, it isn't as if every libertarian here is a buffoon.
Quite frankly, my views on economics are primarily thus:
1) I don't have a perfect understanding of the true complexities of economics;
2) The system that we have can be cranky and cumbersome, but it seems to work pretty well largely;
3) I am reflexively distrustful of someone who presents a sketchy and simple-minded ideology and attempts to represent it as a complete and tested economic system;
4) I am also automatically against any idea that is based on the aesthetic attractiveness of the idea itself rather than what it can do for us here in the real world. I am a nuts and bolts kind of guy.
+1 simple solutions come from simple minds.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
Oodain
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd24b/cd24b8a82d46d1ba842069ffc6f0c167187f6a10" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
My experience is that there are nutjobs and there are sane people, and nutjobs often are louder than sane people.
QFT
this should be thought in first grade, before anything else.
would help to put humans in perspective.
_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//
the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.
JakobVirgil wrote:
WilliamWDelaney wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
WilliamWDelaney wrote:
Oh, and another thing that makes me honestly want to strangle libertarians is that they invariably believe that anyone who is not sold on their crap is a "socialist." Yes, I have to say that this is what make me hate libertarians the most.
I think your problem is actually just talking to dogmatic morons. I mean.... seriously, Republicans often sell the same kind of bs in terms of how democrats are "socialist" even though this is just nonsense given that both parties accept a good amount of market action.
That being said, you really can't blame EVERYBODY because a few people are outspoken morons. After all, while it is true that even on this forum, we have idiotic libertarians, it isn't as if every libertarian here is a buffoon.
Quite frankly, my views on economics are primarily thus:
1) I don't have a perfect understanding of the true complexities of economics;
2) The system that we have can be cranky and cumbersome, but it seems to work pretty well largely;
3) I am reflexively distrustful of someone who presents a sketchy and simple-minded ideology and attempts to represent it as a complete and tested economic system;
4) I am also automatically against any idea that is based on the aesthetic attractiveness of the idea itself rather than what it can do for us here in the real world. I am a nuts and bolts kind of guy.
+1 simple solutions come from simple minds.
Oodain
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd24b/cd24b8a82d46d1ba842069ffc6f0c167187f6a10" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,
i know this is cliche but i feel there is some truth to the statement
"everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler" albert einstein
_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//
the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.
psychohist wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
+1 simple solutions come from simple minds.
The theory of relativity is exceedingly simple. That would make Einstein a simple mind, I guess?
general or special?
there is some irony laden in my statement (it is overly simple)
but we should be on the watch for easy answers to complex problems.
often times market-libertarians are like medieval doctors proscribing leeches for everything.
I am a libertarian in values, in that I prefer the decentrelazation of power and rejection of force.
but agnostic in theory, I don't thrust the market to fix everything.
so maybe simple is the wrong wording.
"easy answers come from hucksters" might be better.
_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??
http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/
Tollorin
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/684a3/684a36c4bd8d1ecf055a729d265cf0650fc0b982" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
Location: Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
AceOfSpades wrote:
Awesomelyglorious wrote:
LibertarianAS wrote:
so basically libertarianism is about LOGIC and FACTS and not about EMOTIONS
interesting
interesting
No psychologist on earth would agree with this given that basic reasoning processes rely on emotions to function. If you remove a person's emotions, they can scarcely make a decision, and the same laws would work for libertarians.
Reason is and ought only be a slave of the passions. -paraphrase of David Hume
In my experience, a randomly selected liberal or social conservative is more likely to have political opinions based on simple emotional impulses than a randomly selected libertarian (not that this invalidates liberalism or social conservatism).
Tollorin wrote:
So libertarian lack of emotions. Would it not make them close of sociopaths!? And then, using a twisted view of "liberty" to rationalise they lack of compassion.
Compassion rots and pity kills. Mean and lean is the right way to be. Better to be Just than Merciful.
ruveyn
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
What makes autistics happy and living good lives? |
14 Dec 2024, 5:50 am |
A wallpaper question: People or No People? |
17 Feb 2025, 9:53 am |
Do people think you are a WAG? |
16 Feb 2025, 10:09 pm |
Attachment to people |
18 Feb 2025, 7:09 pm |