puddingmouse wrote:
Was raised a Catholic, but dabbled in Quakerism and Buddhism. Nowadays, I alternate between apatheism and dystheism. I normally don't care about the existence of a god, but I think if a god or gods exists, they're either evil, unconcerned, or utterly incompetent. I can sympathise with some pagan pantheons with their rather flawed and sometimes nasty deities. I like to think of myself as standing alone, human, against cosmic rubbishness. Trying to stand up with a brave face towards the horrible whims of chance and the inevitability of suffering, death and decay.
I failed at being a Buddhist because I couldn't believe that suffering could be dispensed with by enlightenment (or even attachment to suffering). I can sort of believe that we are already enlightened (as they do in Zen) - you're supposed to practice to sustain that fact and remember it more, but I fell out of practice.
Suffering isn't dispensed with by enlightenment, it's dispensed with by removing the sources of suffering, which leads to being enlightened.
Sounds so simple.
The way I interpret the idea that we are all already enlightened, is that we are enlightened to the extent that all we have to do is
lose a bunch of stuff, and it's there.
Suffering isn't inevitable, but decay and death certainly do seem to be.
_________________
Not currently a moderator