sartresue wrote:
Formal Agreement Minority government topic
The idea of coalitions strikes me as bullying, the way the NDP-LIB and BLOC wanted it a few years back.
I believe a formal agreement is the way to go, in order to keep parliament honest, and to ensure NDP ideas for legislation are kept on the front burners.
What I worry about is Mr. Ignatieff in a leadership role. I do not trust him, and I would prefer to see Bob Rae as Liberal leader.
Or the way that the Conservatives, NDP and Bloc wanted it during Martin's administration?
I don't see it as bullying. I see it as putting the responsibility for determining who will have the right to govern in the hands of the House of Commons. Those coalitions, after all, are composed of men and women who were elected by their constituencies.
So, at the end of the day, who do you trust more, Mr. Ignatieff or Mr. Harper? There's no use complaining that the wrong man is leading the Liberal party--the only question, from my perspective, is which of these two men should be Prime Minister? There is no other credible option.
Now, perhaps you want Harper back in, so that Ignatieff can be disposed of and Bob crowned. That's certainly a reasoned approach. But I, for one, prefer the propsect of a Liberal, or a Liberal/NDP cabinet to Conservative one.
_________________
--James