Soros has ties to over 30 Major News Organizations

Post Reply New Topic

1. Glenn Beck doesn't control everything that goes on there.

2. I'm currently looking at www.theblaze.com and there is not any articles on that are anti-semetic.

While some people there can be a little paranoid, your comments about everyone or even the majority being anti-semetic is disingenious (putting it mildly) on your part.

The worst stuff goes on in the comments. Don't claim ignorance unless you're prepared to fully embrace it.

I'm reading through the comments of an article right now and the majority are pro-Israel. There are a few whom have made anti-semetic comments but they are a small minority and are usually confronted by the others.


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/deadly- ... le-fronts/

Looks more like an accusation towards Obama and Europe being anti-semetic and trying to come up with an excuse to wipe Israel out than the poster being anti-semetic, especially if you look at the other comments.


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/deadly- ... le-fronts/

I'm pretty close to simply reporting this to a moderator.

a puppet-master Jew controlling and disrupting world economies.
nope no antisemitism there.

oh and you say you have a Jew friend
so I guess you are righteous among the gentiles.
My dad has been married to a Jew (my mom) for almost 50 years
and hes is antisemitic as hell.

Report me for calling Glenn Beck an antisemite? Or calling his rabid followers antisemites? You take offense to that? Are you a rabid Beck follower? You were attempting to present yourself as a reasonable person, so I had assumed you weren't.

Seriously, what is with you guys and pulling this kinda of shannigan, what you finally figure out you overplayed the race card and are now trying to pull the ethnicity card. You are full of it.

Glenn Beck has an issue with George Soros, it wouldn't matter if Soros is Catholic, Mormon, atheist, agnostic. Soros just happens to be from a Jewish family (not sure he is even Jewish anymore (from a religious standpoint)). That's like saying someone that is against Obama's policies and/or doesn't trust him because he is from Chicago is racist, when in reality it has to do with Obama's policies being destructive to this country and/or the fact Chicago has a reputation for corruption.



You are way out of line.



And I'm not your father, heck I doubt I'm even remotely related to you.



Any other stupid pictures...



I don't see any Stars of David anywhere, in fact Glenn Beck has made it quite clear that he thinks Soros is probably an atheist.

Why would ANYBODY accuse this guy of being an anti-semite???

Well you don't know your uniforms very well for starters, because the hat has a Red Star on it, not a Swastica. Furthermore, he used that uniform for a book cover partially to get liberals to go bananas.

Looks more like he's mocking far left liberals, socialists, and communists.

OK. I stand corrected.

Don't feel too bad, the lamestream media has done its best to paint Beck as being an anti-semite (among other things), and you aren't the only one to have fallen for it.

No, sir. The broader point still stands. I honestly didn't do my due diligence in examining the uniform he wore.

That does NOT change the fact that he is a purveyor of wild conspiracy theories, heavily targeting jews. It doesn't change the fact that on his list of the 9 most dangerous people, 8 of them were jews. It doesn't change the fact that when he targets somebody on his shows, they often receive death threats dripping with anti-semitic rhetoric. All that doesn't change.

I just don't have any pictures of him prancing around in Nazi garb. Don't go overboard with it.

the lamestream media and 400 rabbis
have you ever noticed that black folks
don't like it when you talk about fried chicken?
the puppet master thing is like that for the Jews.
it is a common slur and libel.
a code word for the Z.O.G. it is deep bad stuff.
I know you are a good kid (and not an anti-semite)
but you have shown yourself to be rather dull.
and a parrot of stupid conspiracy.
I am just trying to help.

So do you mean to tell me that a CNN Host is not also serving as an Obama Advisor. Sorry, but that is actually going on.

On his CNN program, Eliot Spitzer asked Fareed, “Look, I read something in the paper this week a couple of days ago that made me bring a smile to my face. It said the president of the United States calls you for wisdom and advice about issues around the world. So first when he calls you, what does he say, hi, Barack, you’re calling for Fareed? What does he do?”

“Mostly it’s been face‑to‑face meetings. You know, it’s usually organized by Tom Donilon, the National Security Advisor. What I’m struck by, though, honestly, Elliott, is how much time he’s spending thinking about the issues of the Arab strain, particularly the issues of Egypt, how to make it go right, what are the mechanisms that the United States has to help the moderates and liberals. It’s been a very thoughtful conversation. You know, we’ll see where it goes,” Zakaria answered.
http://www.glennbeck.com/2011/05/13/cnn ... ses-obama/

“You would think CNN’s standards would be that this guy would no longer be employed as of right now. But those aren’t CNN standards because the guy’s trying to pawn himself off as a newsman,” Pat said.

“I mean, you could have Fareed on but he could say, I cannot talk to you about these issues. Or, he has to say, look, I spoke to the president on these issues and here’s what the president is thinking and this is why, et cetera, et cetera. But then it’s literally an arm of the Obama administration. But at least it’s out in the open. But you would have to draw a line. You’d have to say, I recuse myself because I have inside information. Do you not?” Glenn said.

Glenn pointed out that his show and Zakaria’s show are both opinion show, and its not unusual for hosts of an opinion show to come with a bias. But there is a big difference between Zakaria and Glenn.

Glenn said, “I don’t have a problem with him doing that, or CNN running that. But where we split is I’m not an adviser for the president of the United States. I’m not an advisor.”

“You can’t be advising the president on what the president should be doing in the Middle East and having those secret conversations and then go on the air and say, let me tell you what I think we should do in the Middle East; let me tell you what I think which story is really important. Because you don’t know if he is furthering the president or the administration’s wishes or not.”
http://www.glennbeck.com/2011/05/13/cnn ... ses-obama/

Btw, the link also has a video, which proves Glenn Beck is telling the truth.

Yeah, don't take it personally. You're not responsible for Glenn Beck.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
that is not even the topic.
how many of the republican presidential hopefuls
work directly for Fox news?
but then again you are just Orwell trolling
so I will let it slide.

Actually I have every right to take it personally and all you two have proven is Glenn Beck is right, the two of you have conducted a Saul Alinski style smear campaign, and got caught lieing.

I'm taking what you both said personally, and quite frankly your nonapology/apology is so blatently obvious it is pathetic.

Further if you don't believe our rights are not under assault by the government right now, you two are idiots:

No, you read it right. That’s what the Indiana Supreme Court decided in what would be a laughable finding if it wasn’t so serious:

Quote:

Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes.

The author of the story reporting this is right – somehow the ISC managed, in one fell swoop, to overturn almost 900 years of precedent, going back to the Magna Carta.

Quote:

In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer’s entry. [emphasis mine]

Or said another way, your home is no longer your castle.

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/05/14/i ... by-police/

Unless a Federal Court possibly the US Supreme Court overturns this we effectively no longer have our 4th Amendment rights.