Is Khodorkovsky question really a Jewish question?

Post Reply New Topic

I don't think Hitler view jews as stupid at all.

I think he viewed them as being "not creators". E.g., he thought that whereas many Germans lived through agriculture and industry, many jews lived through financial speculation and exploitation, and that whereas many Germans used their access to the arts and media to create uplifting works, many jews used their access to the arts and media to lower the cultural tone and to denigrate German ideals.

Ultimately, I think Hitler viewed jews as exploiters and corrupters of the German people, which would imply at least some sort of cleverness on the part of jews and some sort of weakness on the part of Germans.

.

Ultimately, I think Hitler viewed jews as exploiters and corrupters of the German people, which would imply at least some sort of cleverness on the part of jews and some sort of weakness on the part of Germans.

I don't think Hitler's views are particularly insightful he was pretty much a failure of a man.

The Reich was a ponzi scheme that destroyed germany.

His thoughts were tired and pedestrian when they were new.

I think the real unanswered question of the third reich is what deficit of character
do the folks that follow him have?
Is it some kind of sympathetic resonance of mediocrity?

Which was Einstein? A corrupter or an exploiter. Same question concerning Mark Chagal..

One Hitler liquidated the Jews of Europe the average IQ of Europe dropped 10 points.
ruveyn

Well at least he succeeded in providing the world with a historical figure that every faceless internet poster can safely feel superior to. [three points well said]



Propaganda rubbish. It was losing the war that destroyed Germany (and "winning" the war did not do a whole lot of good to Britain's Empire either), and the question of how a border dispute between Germany and Poland escalated into a World War is more complicated than the "Hitler wanted to take over the world" propaganda that the masses are still fed to this day. The destruction of Germany and the war that caused it had nothing to do any Nazi ponzi scheme.

In fact, the legacy of the Nazi monetary system actually gave Germany an advantage in the immediate post-war world, as monetary reformer James Gibb Stuart explained in his book The Money Bomb:

"The total destruction of the [post-world-war-one] mark , with all its debit-bearing loans and liabilities, had also wiped out the Federal Government debt. So when did the Germans get their Federal Debt back again? Certainly not during the Nazi regime, which began about 1933, and continued till the military collapse in 1945! ... whatever else the Nazis did, to their own people or to the millions that languished under them, they funded their war effort without leaving behind a debt structure which would burden their successors ... those [post-world-war-two] West Germans embarked on their economic miracle with a negligible degree of national indebtedness, whilst among their former enemies ... the British were funding a debt of some £25,000 million and the Americans ... £270,000 million."
[-2 points no such thing as the marshal plan and demilitarization?]


Your thoughts are tired and pedestrian. (See how easy it is to argue in this fashion?)
[-2 point for use of making a "I know you are but what am I" retort]



Do (present tense) or did (past tense)?
[-3 points for lack asking an answered question]
And do you think there was anything historically unusual about Hitler's so-called "mediocrity". Do you think that our modern-day leaders (whom millions vote for) such as Bush, Obama, Blair and Cameron are men of outstanding character, bravery and intellect?
[2p unrelated but completely true they are all nebishes ]

Hitler was a sleepwalker and a bumbler a failure at everything thing took upon himself to do.

Hitler decided to enter politics soon after being injured in World War I. He was in his late 20s, virtually penniless, with virtually no family or connections, no university education and no political experience. He ended up being jailed for his political activities. But less than ten years after being released from prison, he became Chancellor of Germany.

And yet you think he was a "failure at everything (he) took upon himself to do". Lol!
You would sound more credible if you just called him the devil incarnate (or something) like most others have been taught to.