23 Sep 2011, 8:02 pm
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Who says practicing safe sex isn't responsible?
You shouldn't be having sex at all unless you accept the potential consequences that comes with it.
...and unless you understand the proper usage of contraceptives which, while not 100% effective at preventing said consequences, certainly diminish the likelihood of having to suffer under those consequences. I think it would only be fair to mention that, instead of "Don't have sex. Period. End of discussion."
Also referring to sexually transmitted diseases, unless you're saying that all children should be tested to see if they have any sexually transmitted diseases.
I understood the scope of all that you were referring to, which I meant to encompass in everything I was saying as well (using contraceptives to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STIs). And, no, I don't think all teens (I don't know why you're referring to children) should be tested for STIs unless they feel that it's necessary.
Probably because of something like this:
PROVINCETOWN, Mass. (CBS/AP) How young is too young?
That's the question a Massachusetts public school is facing as they have come under fire for making condoms available to all students, even those in elementary school.
Children start first grade between 5 and 7 years old.
Kris Mineau, president of the conservative Massachusetts Family Institute, calls the idea absurd.
But Provincetown School Board Chairman Peter Grosso defended the policy, saying there is no set age when sexual activity starts.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162- ... 91704.html
Well, if you must know, I personally think such a policy is unnecessary because elementary school students don't need condoms, anyway, since they haven't even hit puberty yet.
Oh really, I thought you said they need to be educated how to use contraceptives so they know how to do 'safe sex'. Guess that school board thought the same way, that it better to teach them while a condom being improperly used wouldn't be as big of an issue...
23 Sep 2011, 8:04 pm
23 Sep 2011, 8:06 pm
23 Sep 2011, 8:10 pm
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Who says practicing safe sex isn't responsible?
You shouldn't be having sex at all unless you accept the potential consequences that comes with it.
...and unless you understand the proper usage of contraceptives which, while not 100% effective at preventing said consequences, certainly diminish the likelihood of having to suffer under those consequences. I think it would only be fair to mention that, instead of "Don't have sex. Period. End of discussion."
Also referring to sexually transmitted diseases, unless you're saying that all children should be tested to see if they have any sexually transmitted diseases.
I understood the scope of all that you were referring to, which I meant to encompass in everything I was saying as well (using contraceptives to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STIs). And, no, I don't think all teens (I don't know why you're referring to children) should be tested for STIs unless they feel that it's necessary.
Probably because of something like this:
PROVINCETOWN, Mass. (CBS/AP) How young is too young?
That's the question a Massachusetts public school is facing as they have come under fire for making condoms available to all students, even those in elementary school.
Children start first grade between 5 and 7 years old.
Kris Mineau, president of the conservative Massachusetts Family Institute, calls the idea absurd.
But Provincetown School Board Chairman Peter Grosso defended the policy, saying there is no set age when sexual activity starts.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162- ... 91704.html
Well, if you must know, I personally think such a policy is unnecessary because elementary school students don't need condoms, anyway, since they haven't even hit puberty yet.
Oh really, I thought you said they need to be educated how to use contraceptives so they know how to do 'safe sex'. Guess that school board thought the same way, that it better to teach them while a condom being improperly used wouldn't be as big of an issue...
Wherein did I mention children? I was referring to those of pubescent age, i.e. middle/high school students.
Last edited by Descartes on 23 Sep 2011, 8:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
23 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
Marriage is the cause of 100% of divorces 
pandabear wrote:
All in favor of Inuyasha remaining celibate, say "Aye!"
a Fox News Esoteric, no time for earthly/reality based pleasures
23 Sep 2011, 8:16 pm
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Who says practicing safe sex isn't responsible?
You shouldn't be having sex at all unless you accept the potential consequences that comes with it.
...and unless you understand the proper usage of contraceptives which, while not 100% effective at preventing said consequences, certainly diminish the likelihood of having to suffer under those consequences. I think it would only be fair to mention that, instead of "Don't have sex. Period. End of discussion."
Also referring to sexually transmitted diseases, unless you're saying that all children should be tested to see if they have any sexually transmitted diseases.
I understood the scope of all that you were referring to, which I meant to encompass in everything I was saying as well (using contraceptives to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STIs). And, no, I don't think all teens (I don't know why you're referring to children) should be tested for STIs unless they feel that it's necessary.
Probably because of something like this:
PROVINCETOWN, Mass. (CBS/AP) How young is too young?
That's the question a Massachusetts public school is facing as they have come under fire for making condoms available to all students, even those in elementary school.
Children start first grade between 5 and 7 years old.
Kris Mineau, president of the conservative Massachusetts Family Institute, calls the idea absurd.
But Provincetown School Board Chairman Peter Grosso defended the policy, saying there is no set age when sexual activity starts.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162- ... 91704.html
Well, if you must know, I personally think such a policy is unnecessary because elementary school students don't need condoms, anyway, since they haven't even hit puberty yet.
Oh really, I thought you said they need to be educated how to use contraceptives so they know how to do 'safe sex'. Guess that school board thought the same way, that it better to teach them while a condom being improperly used wouldn't be as big of an issue...
I was referring to those of pubescent age, i.e. middle/high school students.
And I'm pointing out what the school board was probably thinking. Teach them while they are in elementary while it wouldn't be that big of a deal if a condom got ripped or something.
Seriously, this is what I've been telling people there was a problem with.
Oodain
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,
23 Sep 2011, 8:18 pm
23 Sep 2011, 8:22 pm
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Descartes wrote:
Who says practicing safe sex isn't responsible?
You shouldn't be having sex at all unless you accept the potential consequences that comes with it.
...and unless you understand the proper usage of contraceptives which, while not 100% effective at preventing said consequences, certainly diminish the likelihood of having to suffer under those consequences. I think it would only be fair to mention that, instead of "Don't have sex. Period. End of discussion."
Also referring to sexually transmitted diseases, unless you're saying that all children should be tested to see if they have any sexually transmitted diseases.
I understood the scope of all that you were referring to, which I meant to encompass in everything I was saying as well (using contraceptives to prevent unwanted pregnancies and STIs). And, no, I don't think all teens (I don't know why you're referring to children) should be tested for STIs unless they feel that it's necessary.
Probably because of something like this:
PROVINCETOWN, Mass. (CBS/AP) How young is too young?
That's the question a Massachusetts public school is facing as they have come under fire for making condoms available to all students, even those in elementary school.
Children start first grade between 5 and 7 years old.
Kris Mineau, president of the conservative Massachusetts Family Institute, calls the idea absurd.
But Provincetown School Board Chairman Peter Grosso defended the policy, saying there is no set age when sexual activity starts.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162- ... 91704.html
Well, if you must know, I personally think such a policy is unnecessary because elementary school students don't need condoms, anyway, since they haven't even hit puberty yet.
Oh really, I thought you said they need to be educated how to use contraceptives so they know how to do 'safe sex'. Guess that school board thought the same way, that it better to teach them while a condom being improperly used wouldn't be as big of an issue...
I was referring to those of pubescent age, i.e. middle/high school students.
And I'm pointing out what the school board was probably thinking. Teach them while they are in elementary while it wouldn't be that big of a deal if a condom got ripped or something.
Seriously, this is what I've been telling people there was a problem with.
So, just because one school board takes an idea too far means that the idea itself is inherently bad?
23 Sep 2011, 8:58 pm
23 Sep 2011, 9:36 pm
23 Sep 2011, 10:45 pm
23 Sep 2011, 10:50 pm
Abstinence is great except for the not getting laid part 
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,424
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
24 Sep 2011, 1:41 am
Obres wrote:
Abstinence is great except for the not getting laid part
That had always been my problem with it.
When I was in high school and most of college, I couldn't have gotten a date, let alone had sex with anyone. So, I was abstinent against my will.
I must say, today sex is maybe the funnest part of marriage.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
24 Sep 2011, 4:10 am
24 Sep 2011, 5:34 am
24 Sep 2011, 7:10 am
