Which slope are we on? (Poll)
I edited your post for clarity. ;)
_________________
No dx yet ... AS=171/200,NT=13/200 ... EQ=9/SQ=128 ... AQ=39 ... MB=IntJ
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,558
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Um...my Grandpa was a Teamsters boss (back in the hoffa years)...and it wasn't a union at all, it was organized crime. He carried a 9mm, it was part of the job.
I personally feel the Unions to be a complete sham that has nothing to do with worker advocacy. The Unions as the now stand (Wobblies excepted), are workers ceding control to professional advocates. Advocates that bargain for their personal profit. Unions have ceded nearly every "worker's right" that was won at the turn of the 19th-20th century, quite slowly, in tacit agreement with the business owners.
Unions have nothing to do with direct worker control. Their purpose is to convince workers to shut up and go back to work.
My Grandaddy was an old time Wobbly!
Also, my Dad had been a union grievance man with the Steel Workers of America. Never once did he take advantage of workers, and "tell them to get back to work," when they had legitimate grievances with the company.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,920
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
but which one?
(F)ascism?
(C)ommunism?
(R)eligious dictatorship?
a (L)iberal cesspool where dogs can marry cats?
(A)narchy
All of the above. They can all be found in Occupy Wall Street alone.
Yes because Facism and what the Occupy movement stands for are pretty much the same thing same goes for religious dictatorships.
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
_________________
We won't go back.
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/17/red-white-and-angry%E2%80%A8-communist-nazi-parties-endorse-occupy-protests/
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,558
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/17/red-white-and-angry%E2%80%A8-communist-nazi-parties-endorse-occupy-protests/
The Nazis only supported the Occupy movement because they (the Nazis) associate the banks with Jews. That, and because it would get the Neo-Nazis free publicity. Otherwise, the Nazis would be accusing the Occupy people of being communists and dirty hippies.
This is BS that the Republicans blow out of proportion. Funny how the Republicans were quiet when White Supremacists had promoted - and even took part in - the Tea Party.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,920
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/17/red-white-and-angry%E2%80%A8-communist-nazi-parties-endorse-occupy-protests/
That does not mean the occupy protests endorse them........though I see nothing wrong with the communist party, but yeah I am pretty sure the majority of people participating in the Occupy protests do not support neo-nazis. I would be under the impression the stupid nazi organization just feels they can somehow use the movement to their advangtage they don't actually support what its about if you knew anything about neo-nazis that would go along with their logic....and the part of the article that says
'While Nazis seem unenthusiastic about visibly linking their flagship organization to the vocal protests that have popped up in dozens of U.S. cities, the same can’t be said of the Communist Party USA.
seems to confirm my theory.
_________________
We won't go back.
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/17/red-white-and-angry%E2%80%A8-communist-nazi-parties-endorse-occupy-protests/
That does not mean the occupy protests endorse them........though I see nothing wrong with the communist party, but yeah I am pretty sure the majority of people participating in the Occupy protests do not support neo-nazis. I would be under the impression the stupid nazi organization just feels they can somehow use the movement to their advangtage they don't actually support what its about if you knew anything about neo-nazis that would go along with their logic....and the part of the article that says
'While Nazis seem unenthusiastic about visibly linking their flagship organization to the vocal protests that have popped up in dozens of U.S. cities, the same can’t be said of the Communist Party USA.
seems to confirm my theory.
Nazis, fascists, socialists, communists...all collectivist scum. None have any respect for or understanding of individual rights. Collectivism is not about helping others, it's about controlling others and making subjects out of citizens.
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/17/red-white-and-angry%E2%80%A8-communist-nazi-parties-endorse-occupy-protests/
The Nazis only supported the Occupy movement because they (the Nazis) associate the banks with Jews. That, and because it would get the Neo-Nazis free publicity. Otherwise, the Nazis would be accusing the Occupy people of being communists and dirty hippies.
This is BS that the Republicans blow out of proportion. Funny how the Republicans were quiet when White Supremacists had promoted - and even took part in - the Tea Party.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Republicans/Social conservatives/White Supremacists = moral collectivists
Democrats/Occupiers/Liberals = economic collectivists
Both want control over you; the first seeks to be the master of your mind, the other seeks to be the master of the products of your labor. Either way you're still a slave.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,558
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/17/red-white-and-angry%E2%80%A8-communist-nazi-parties-endorse-occupy-protests/
The Nazis only supported the Occupy movement because they (the Nazis) associate the banks with Jews. That, and because it would get the Neo-Nazis free publicity. Otherwise, the Nazis would be accusing the Occupy people of being communists and dirty hippies.
This is BS that the Republicans blow out of proportion. Funny how the Republicans were quiet when White Supremacists had promoted - and even took part in - the Tea Party.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Republicans/Social conservatives/White Supremacists = moral collectivists
Democrats/Occupiers/Liberals = economic collectivists
Both want control over you; the first seeks to be the master of your mind, the other seeks to be the master of the products of your labor. Either way you're still a slave.
Isn't that a tad bit cynical?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/17/red-white-and-angry%E2%80%A8-communist-nazi-parties-endorse-occupy-protests/
The Nazis only supported the Occupy movement because they (the Nazis) associate the banks with Jews. That, and because it would get the Neo-Nazis free publicity. Otherwise, the Nazis would be accusing the Occupy people of being communists and dirty hippies.
This is BS that the Republicans blow out of proportion. Funny how the Republicans were quiet when White Supremacists had promoted - and even took part in - the Tea Party.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Republicans/Social conservatives/White Supremacists = moral collectivists
Democrats/Occupiers/Liberals = economic collectivists
Both want control over you; the first seeks to be the master of your mind, the other seeks to be the master of the products of your labor. Either way you're still a slave.
Isn't that a tad bit cynical?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Cynical or not, it's the truth.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,920
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/17/red-white-and-angry%E2%80%A8-communist-nazi-parties-endorse-occupy-protests/
That does not mean the occupy protests endorse them........though I see nothing wrong with the communist party, but yeah I am pretty sure the majority of people participating in the Occupy protests do not support neo-nazis. I would be under the impression the stupid nazi organization just feels they can somehow use the movement to their advangtage they don't actually support what its about if you knew anything about neo-nazis that would go along with their logic....and the part of the article that says
'While Nazis seem unenthusiastic about visibly linking their flagship organization to the vocal protests that have popped up in dozens of U.S. cities, the same can’t be said of the Communist Party USA.
seems to confirm my theory.
Nazis, fascists, socialists, communists...all collectivist scum. None have any respect for or understanding of individual rights. Collectivism is not about helping others, it's about controlling others and making subjects out of citizens.
Well thats a load of bull.......I can see that with Nazis and facists, but socialism and communism not so much. Communism means a classless society so how do you figure its about controlling others and making subjects out of citizens.....I mean with what ruling class? after all there can be no ruling class in true communism.
As for socialism it does have its flaws however it is a system based more upon the idea of providing for all the people, unlike Facism or Nazism which actually are all about controlling others and making subjects out of citizens.
nice try though.
_________________
We won't go back.
Sweetleaf
Veteran
Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,920
Location: Somewhere in Colorado
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/17/red-white-and-angry%E2%80%A8-communist-nazi-parties-endorse-occupy-protests/
The Nazis only supported the Occupy movement because they (the Nazis) associate the banks with Jews. That, and because it would get the Neo-Nazis free publicity. Otherwise, the Nazis would be accusing the Occupy people of being communists and dirty hippies.
This is BS that the Republicans blow out of proportion. Funny how the Republicans were quiet when White Supremacists had promoted - and even took part in - the Tea Party.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Republicans/Social conservatives/White Supremacists = moral collectivists
Democrats/Occupiers/Liberals = economic collectivists
Both want control over you; the first seeks to be the master of your mind, the other seeks to be the master of the products of your labor. Either way you're still a slave.
I question the accuracy of this.
_________________
We won't go back.
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/17/red-white-and-angry%E2%80%A8-communist-nazi-parties-endorse-occupy-protests/
The Nazis only supported the Occupy movement because they (the Nazis) associate the banks with Jews. That, and because it would get the Neo-Nazis free publicity. Otherwise, the Nazis would be accusing the Occupy people of being communists and dirty hippies.
This is BS that the Republicans blow out of proportion. Funny how the Republicans were quiet when White Supremacists had promoted - and even took part in - the Tea Party.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Republicans/Social conservatives/White Supremacists = moral collectivists
Democrats/Occupiers/Liberals = economic collectivists
Both want control over you; the first seeks to be the master of your mind, the other seeks to be the master of the products of your labor. Either way you're still a slave.
I question the accuracy of this.
Question it all you want. The more you question it, the sooner you will realize that it is irrefutable.
There is a fair amount of all the others but I don't think there are many facists or people who would like a religious dictatorship in the Occupy movement.
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/17/red-white-and-angry%E2%80%A8-communist-nazi-parties-endorse-occupy-protests/
The Nazis only supported the Occupy movement because they (the Nazis) associate the banks with Jews. That, and because it would get the Neo-Nazis free publicity. Otherwise, the Nazis would be accusing the Occupy people of being communists and dirty hippies.
This is BS that the Republicans blow out of proportion. Funny how the Republicans were quiet when White Supremacists had promoted - and even took part in - the Tea Party.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Republicans/Social conservatives/White Supremacists = moral collectivists
Democrats/Occupiers/Liberals = economic collectivists
Both want control over you; the first seeks to be the master of your mind, the other seeks to be the master of the products of your labor. Either way you're still a slave.
Isn't that a tad bit cynical?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Cynical or not, it's the truth.
What makes you think a "libertarian" society would let you be a "master of the products of your labor"? Was this ever the case for ordinary workers in the 19th century industrial dystopias of the world? I'd use your favorite word to describe your "libertarian" brainwashing... ludicrous.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Poll: Are you a contrarian? |
03 Nov 2024, 7:35 pm |
Poll: What can you get to sleep wearing? |
29 Sep 2024, 9:13 pm |