Page 3 of 5 [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next


Is incest immoral and should it be illegal?
Yes it is immoral and should be punished to the full extent of the law 13%  13%  [ 7 ]
It's immoral but shouldn't be a crime 15%  15%  [ 8 ]
It's not really immoral but it should be a crime anyway 4%  4%  [ 2 ]
Depends on the exact relationship of the two people 31%  31%  [ 16 ]
No there's nothing inherently wrong with it, it should be legal even though it's gross 37%  37%  [ 19 ]
Total votes : 52

Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

31 Jan 2012, 7:43 pm

Daemonic-Jackal wrote:
Although the fact that it's legally acceptable to marry your first cousin but not have a relationship with a step-sibling (when there is no bloodline connection) is a flawed concept.


A lot of sex laws don't make much sense. This is but one example.



donnie_darko
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,981

01 Feb 2012, 2:01 am

naturalplastic wrote:
donnie_darko wrote:
Tequila wrote:
donnie_darko wrote:
It's all relative I guess.



No pun intended?


Nope none intended! :D



MarketAndChurch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,022
Location: The Peoples Republic Of Portland

01 Feb 2012, 5:03 am

the secular case is a health one. Whose to say its immoral if it is between two adults and consentual, whose to say any forms of sexual relations is immoral if it is between two adults and and consentual. If it is not unhealthy and they use protection so that they don't make mentally inept children, the secular and consistent answer should be yes, it is fine if those two requirements are met.


_________________
It is not up to you to finish the task, nor are you free to desist from trying.


CrazyCatLord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2011
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,177

01 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm

MarketAndChurch wrote:
the secular case is a health one. Whose to say its immoral if it is between two adults and consentual, whose to say any forms of sexual relations is immoral if it is between two adults and and consentual. If it is not unhealthy and they use protection so that they don't make mentally inept children, the secular and consistent answer should be yes, it is fine if those two requirements are met.


Sorry, but that is a straw man. The secular case is one of healthy boundaries in family environments, out of concern for the psychological health of children. Religious morals need not enter into it.

I don't know of any secular country where incest is legal. Even Sweden, where 85% of the population identify as atheists and agnostics, prohibits incest. These laws are rarely enforced when all parties are consenting adults, but they still exist to protect minors from sexual coercion by parents and older siblings.



OliveOilMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere

01 Feb 2012, 4:09 pm

I live in the Deep South. It's pretty common for second cousins to marry here. First cousins can't legally marry, but I know a couple who are first cousins who live together. I think for cousins, it depends really. If you are raised like brother and sister then it's sort of gross, but I really have no problems with cousins being together.

The thing about having messed up kids is not exactly correct. You simply have a higher chance of having a child with problems because you both likely have the same recessive genes. If those genes match up, thats when the child has a problem. My sister in law married her second cousin (by blood, not marriage) and they have two beautiful, smart, grown girls. The younger one is about to have her first baby now. She didn't marry a cousin.

Brother/sister incest is different. I think it's because of the mindset that you are raised together with. The kind of love you have for your sibling is very different from the kind you have for a romantic partner. I couldn't see switching off the deeper and different sibling love to have a romantic love, which while deep, is different. Also, if you break up with them, they are still blood kin. Close kin at that.

Parent/child incest to me is extremely wrong. I have children. Two boys and two girls. My oldest boy is almost 23 and grown with a child of his own. I know he's a grown man, but to me he's still my little boy. I could never see him in the same way I might see another guy his age. Although to me, boys his age are still little boys to me. I wouldn't be a good cougar at all.

As I mentioned on another thread, unintentional half sibling incest may be on the rise soon, because of the popularity of sperm banks. There is really no way to know, without genetic testing, if two people who were conceived via a sperm bank, are in fact siblings. Also, not every sperm donor child knows they were conceived that way. I would imagine that if a couple were dating and found out their mothers both used sperm banks and the same bank or city, they might get tested to make sure they weren't related, but if they don't know, then there could potentially be a problem if the recessive genes match up.

I saw something on a talk show years ago about a couple overseas somewhere who met at college, dated, married, had kids, and one of the kids had a problem. They subsequently got lots of medical tests and found out they were full siblings. Twins even. They had just thought it was cool that they had the same birthday. Their mother had given them both up for adoption at birth. For some reason they were given to seperate families and never knew of each others existence. The courts wanted to annul the marriage but they were fighting to stay married, because they couldn't see each other as siblings.


_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA. ;-)

The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com


abacacus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,380

01 Feb 2012, 4:13 pm

I remember the case of the married twins somewhat.

I don't see why their marriage should be broken up, but I think they should be barred from having any more children.


_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

01 Feb 2012, 4:14 pm

abacacus wrote:
I remember the case of the married twins somewhat.

I don't see why their marriage should be broken up, but I think they should be barred from having any more children.


Are those married twins German by any chance?



OliveOilMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere

01 Feb 2012, 4:57 pm

Bradleigh wrote:
From what I understand the ick factor apparently comes from ones own experience where the body assess people you grew up with from a young age as non suitable choices as mates, which is biological instinct with the point of creating diverse genetics. A long line of incest can create problems, but a single generation will rarely create any issue at all, and really lots of people have issues and have no relation to incest at all. It just seems that people jump on putting themselves into the persons shoes, and feel that relations with their own family sound disgusting, and as that starts run into culture which then makes a general rule that relations with family is taboo.

I guess I too find the idea of relations with my family would be disgusting, perhaps that biological thing with people you grew up with, perhaps some of the conditioning cultures rule of it being wrong, being told repeatedly it is wrong. But I remember hearing a story about where a woman ended up with a relation with her father, the stinger being that the father was never actually in her life, and they did not even know when they were related when they started. Now the couple got in big trouble because the law says it is illegal, there has been lots of uproar over it, reasons mostly given are genetics, chances are that genetic similarities are what originally attracted themselves to each other. But hey they love each other, and saying that it is wrong seems so against other parts of society that says love is the most important, it is not like he is taking advantage of each other, to me it almost looks like Romeo and Juliet. By the way Juliet was 13 in Romeo and Juliet, how awkward does that sound?


I don't think it's so much people you grew up with from a young age, because there are lots of cases where kids who knew each other from kindergarden grew up to marry. I think a lot of it is that it's just so ingrained that those who live with you are not suitable. You are taught as a child never to let anybody else see certain parts of your body, but then you are plopped naked in a bathtub with your brother or sister when you are 3 years old, or you are allowed to run around the house in your underwear when you are 8 but if your sisters friend comes over you are told to put pants on. It's just conditioning that "these people don't look at you like that, they don't count that way"


_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA. ;-)

The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com


abacacus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,380

01 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm

Tequila wrote:
abacacus wrote:
I remember the case of the married twins somewhat.

I don't see why their marriage should be broken up, but I think they should be barred from having any more children.


Are those married twins German by any chance?


Not entirely sure. My first thought was English, but it's been a while since I've read the article.


_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.


pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

02 Feb 2012, 10:42 am

Here is another interesting twist

http://gma.yahoo.com/polo-club-founder- ... -news.html

I didn't know that you could adopt an adult. If his relationship with his girlfriend includes coitus, then he will be committing incest.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 66
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

02 Feb 2012, 1:28 pm

Lemon Incest

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6bOIX_QsDE[/youtube]



peebo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Mar 2006
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624
Location: scotland

02 Feb 2012, 1:44 pm

Daemonic-Jackal wrote:

Although the fact that it's legally acceptable to marry your first cousin but not have a relationship with a step-sibling (when there is no bloodline connection) is a flawed concept.


wait. where is this illegal? i know personally of a married step sibling couple who are not blood related who have grown up children?


_________________
?Civil government, so far as it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.?

Adam Smith


AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

02 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm

I think there are two sides to the issue, and visa kinda pointed out something which isn't all that different from my personal views (pointing to legality).

I don't see what's morally wrong with 1st cousins pairing up. It's aunts/uncles-nephews/nieces I take issue with. Obviously I think brother-sister pairing is wrong, and I also think it's improper for step-siblings to have sex as well as for step-parents/-children. I'd even extend that to adopted children/siblings as well. Obvious reasons aside, I think there's just too much room for exploitive relationships when things like that happen. I'm not all that concerned with genetic factors, though that is also good reason to avoid close relationships. But 1st cousins are far enough apart for genetic diversity and minimize negative effects from recessive defects.

Where I see a problem is when the law is involved. I don't mind admitting that my views are largely faith-motivated, and if we all agree (religious or not) that certain things are "just wrong" and should be outlawed, then fine. What I see as a problem is that certain behaviors previously largely thought of as taboo are now "tolerated" and sexual permissiveness is largely culturally accepted. I think it's hypocritical and inconsistent to bar certain actions and not others. If it is illegal for adult brothers-sisters or fathers-daughters, etc. to pair as consenting individuals, then I think one ought to at least consider why it is we allow other kinds of activity previously defined as illegal.



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

03 Feb 2012, 12:06 pm

There's another interesting phenomenon out there with which we will have to come to grips:

Half-siblings, not known to each other, forming a sexual relationship.

When a relatively small number of sperm donors are providing the bulk of the supply available for fertility treatment for couples with an infertile male, that creates a wide pool of half-siblings who have no idea that they are genetically related to each other.

While step-siblings, known to each other, present no particular concern, half-siblings not known to each other present a highly elevated risk of congenital defects in their offspring. And we have groups of hundreds of these half-siblings out there.


_________________
--James


AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

03 Feb 2012, 12:36 pm

visagrunt wrote:
There's another interesting phenomenon out there with which we will have to come to grips:

Half-siblings, not known to each other, forming a sexual relationship.

When a relatively small number of sperm donors are providing the bulk of the supply available for fertility treatment for couples with an infertile male, that creates a wide pool of half-siblings who have no idea that they are genetically related to each other.

While step-siblings, known to each other, present no particular concern, half-siblings not known to each other present a highly elevated risk of congenital defects in their offspring. And we have groups of hundreds of these half-siblings out there.

I thought about that, too. I don't think, though, that we should exaggerate the reality of it. I'd say the likelihood of that actually happening is low enough we don't have to be that concerned about it. A "highly elevated" risk to me would mean three or more generations of inbreeding. That would be, like, a woman born from donor sperm be given the same donor sperm herself. It would be a great idea to take measures to prevent that from happening, which would also prevent the same kinds of problems you mentioned.

It also somewhat goes along with what I was talking about. If this is the kind of thing we can allow, then knowingly pairing with someone you're closely related with shouldn't be stigmatized.



shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

03 Feb 2012, 1:12 pm

My opinion is "ew". I am sure my sisters share my opinion.