Kurgan wrote:
There are many different forms of liberal parties in the US as well; too bad most Americans ignore their right to vote for a third party candidate.
...
I sometimes think it is a form of brand loyalty that keeps the two-party system in place in the USA. I had a longer online relationship with an American woman, who told me that she couldn't imagine living anywhere outside of the U.S. because she couldn't buy all her favorite food brands in other countries.
I found that very puzzling, because the availability of Hot Pockets® or Cheez-It® crackers would be the very last thing on my mind if I were to contemplate living in another country (which I did a few times in the past). Fresh vegetables, meat and fruits are sold pretty much everywhere on this planet. As for things like bread and dairy products, I haven't bought any brand in the recent decades that I've previously seen in an ad or commercial. Most German supermarkets have their own cheap brands that aren't advertised anywhere.
Anyway, I think that this dependence on branded items might also affect U.S. politics. There are two big brands, red and blue, a donkey logo and an elephant symbol. You rarely ever see anything else in the news or in political debates. The other parties are like obscure no-name brands, plain white cans with "Cola" printed on them in black Helvetica type. People don't drink that kind of thing, and they certainly don't serve it to their guests. What would the Founding Fathers™ think? One either votes for Coke® or for Pepsi®, for the red or the blue bottle, because that's what people grew up with.