thomas81 wrote:
you know i very much doubt that during 1928 Germany more than half the electorate were in favour of specifically gassing 6 million jews.
However they were in favour of a radical solution spurred on by the financial crisis. I am in no doubt that Europe is currently heading for a resurgent financial crisis.
If Anders Brievik ever becomes a political tour de force, it will be because of social conditioning 15 or 20 years down the line, not necessarilly right now.
This is sloppy thinking.
you're lumping together two different things- one is a sane issue that no one denies, and the other thing is absurd.
.
Breviks beliefs could become a political force. But Brevik himself will never because he is unelectable.
American voters gag and choke at the thought of voting for a Mormon, or voting for a Black guy with a Muslim sounding name. Only one openly gay man has ever won office (Barney Frank) that I know of. And no openly athiest politician has ever been elected in the USA. But even atheism isnt as bad as being a psychotic mass murderer.
Ideologically Timothy McViegh was (for practical purposes) the forunner of the Tea Party movement. That doesnt mean that Sarah Palin is going to spring him from prison and make him her running mate.
The Abolitionists voted for Lincoln. They didnt vote for John Brown.
And to even the few who are not repelled by him -his talent is murder- not administration- not speech making-not diplomacy. Even other homocidal maniacs wouldnt see him as qualified to run a country even if they applaud what he did.
A politician who espouses the same anti immigrant creed that brevik killed in the name of might well tap into rising resentment and become a force "ten or fifteen years from now". Nobody denies that. But Brevik himself could not become that politician.