Board index › Topical Discussion › Politics, Philosophy, and Religion

Political and Social Identification

Page 3 of 3 [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Previous topic | Next topic

Politically/Socially Conservative or Liberal?
Politically and socially conservative 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Politically and socially liberal 62%  62%  [ 13 ]
Politically conservative and socially liberal 33%  33%  [ 7 ]
Politically liberal and socially conservative 5%  5%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 21

RushKing
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States

07 Oct 2013, 5:14 pm

Magneto wrote:
Yes. In this day an age. With modern techniques and knowledge. Obviously...

RushKing, no-one is "forced" to sign the contract in a free market. What you seem to want is to force them to not sign it... just like a petty statist.

If people who entered the factory had to sign your contract or else; you have a monopoly of violence and you are a ruler. None of that was justifiable or necessary.



Last edited by RushKing on 07 Oct 2013, 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,623
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

07 Oct 2013, 5:17 pm

Magneto wrote:
Yes. In this day an age. With modern techniques and knowledge. Obviously...

RushKing, no-one is "forced" to sign the contract in a free market. What you seem to want is to force them to not sign it... just like a petty statist.


I should have added in my initial response that in this day and age, a small landholder would actually find it much more difficult to raise crops and/or livestock to sell them at a market with mostly other small landholders to compete with. In that sense, the rural, agrarian world of my 19th and early 20th century forbears was more conducive to homesteading.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



Magneto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,086
Location: Blighty

07 Oct 2013, 6:15 pm

Maybe they'd find it easier if there weren't so many regulations brought in at the behest of big farma, and Intellectual Priviledge for companies like Monsanto...

RushKing, no-one is forced to enter my factory. It's like my house. If you come to my house, you obey my rules. That doesn't mean you're being forced to obey my rules, only that I will use force to eject you from my house if you disobey them. Is that really hard to understand?



RushKing
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,340
Location: Minnesota, United States

08 Oct 2013, 10:37 am

Magneto wrote:
Maybe they'd find it easier if there weren't so many regulations brought in at the behest of big farma, and Intellectual Priviledge for companies like Monsanto...

RushKing, no-one is forced to enter my factory. It's like my house. If you come to my house, you obey my rules. That doesn't mean you're being forced to obey my rules, only that I will use force to eject you from my house if you disobey them. Is that really hard to understand?

It's not like your house because you can't use it, therefore it is not a personal possession. Most capitalists I know rely on state privileges to evict people from factories. No one is going to put up with armed thuggery in an anarchist society. Saying mine, is no excuse to dictate over a building you can't posses. You still haven't manged to justify your authority, and this is assuming it is possible for one individual to build a whole factory by himself.